The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward controlling gene expression at will: Selection and design of zinc finger domains recognizing each of the 5′-GNN-3′ DNA target sequences
Abstract
We have taken a comprehensive approach to the generation of novel DNA binding zinc finger domains of defined specificity. Herein we describe the generation and characterization of a family of zinc finger domains developed for the recognition of each of the 16 possible 3-bp DNA binding sites having the sequence 5′-GNN-3′. Phage display libraries of zinc finger proteins were created and selected under conditions that favor enrichment of sequence-specific proteins. Zinc finger domains recognizing a number of sequences required refinement by site-directed mutagenesis that was guided by both phage selection data and structural information. In many cases, residues not expected to make base-specific contacts had effects on specificity. A number of these domains demonstrate exquisite specificity and discriminate between sequences that differ by a single base with >100-fold loss in affinity. We conclude that the three helical positions −1, 3, and 6 of a zinc finger domain are insufficient to allow for the fine specificity of the DNA binding domain to be predicted. These domains are functionally modular and may be recombined with one another to create polydactyl proteins capable of binding 18-bp sequences with subnanomolar affinity. The family of zinc finger domains described here is sufficient for the construction of 17 million novel proteins that bind the 5′-(GNN) 6 -3′ family of DNA sequences. These materials and methods should allow for the rapid construction of novel gene switches and provide the basis for a universal system for gene control.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These two methods have seen use as genetic editing mechanisms, for gene insertion, deletion, and modulation in multiple species and cell lines.
“These two methods have seen use as genetic editing mechanisms, for gene insertion, deletion, and modulation in multiple species and cell lines [93,94,95,96,97].”
From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [95]
Citations
Cites
Crystal Structure of a Five-Finger GLI-DNA Complex: New Perspectives on Zinc Fingers
Pavletich, N. P., & Pabo, C. O. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8378770 · Cited by 669
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1038/214232a0 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03825.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.2503871 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.2028256 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00125-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00047-1 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsb1196-940 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13577 · DOI
- 10.1038/366483a0 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1291 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.11.5525 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.95.6.2938 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.272.12.7801 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.11.5617 · DOI
- 10.1038/349175a0 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/20.16.4137 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi00010a011 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.340120202 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7345 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.91.23.11163 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.275.5300.657 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.8303274 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi00185a004 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12834 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi981358z · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.92.2.344 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.88.18.7978 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1046-2023(05)80212-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0958-1669(97)80075-4 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.15.4.2275 · DOI
- 10.1038/nm0196-100 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/22.16.3397 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.91.23.11168 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0959-440X(97)80015-2 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14628 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering
Gaj, T., Gersbach, C. A., & Barbas, C. F. (2013) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004 · Cited by 3,820
Self-citationGenome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases
Urnov, F. D., Rebar, E. J., Holmes, M. C., Zhang, H. S., & Gregory, P. D. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2842 · Cited by 2,285
Targeted Chromosomal Cleavage and Mutagenesis in Drosophila Using Zinc-Finger Nucleases
Bibikova, M., Golic, M., Golic, K. G., & Carroll, D. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/161.3.1169 · Cited by 860
Revealing off-target cleavage specificities of zinc-finger nucleases by in vitro selection
Pattanayak, V., Ramirez, C. L., Joung, J. K., & Liu, D. R. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1670 · Cited by 453
Guo, J., Gaj, T., & Barbas, C. F. (2010) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.04.060 · Cited by 206
Self-citationZinc-finger nucleases as a novel therapeutic strategy for targeting hepatitis B virus DNAs
Cradick, T. J., Keck, K., Bradshaw, S., Jamieson, A. C., & McCaffrey, A. P. (2010) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2010.20 · Cited by 184
Custom zinc-finger nucleases for use in human cells
Alwin, S., Gere, M. B., Guhl, E., Effertz, K., Barbas, C. F., Segal, D. J., Weitzman, M. D., & Cathomen, T. (2005) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.06.094 · Cited by 165
Design, engineering, and characterization of zinc finger nucleases
Mani, M., Kandavelou, K., Dy, F. J., Durai, S., & Chandrasegaran, S. (2005) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.089 · Cited by 129
Loureiro, A., & da Silva, G. J. (2019) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics8010018 · Cited by 129
Tools for experimental and computational analyses of off-target editing by programmable nucleases
Bao, X. R., Pan, Y., Lee, C. M., Davis, T. H., & Bao, G. (2021) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-020-00431-y · Cited by 106
Context-dependent DNA recognition code for C2H2 zinc-finger transcription factors
Liu, J., & Stormo, G. D. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn331 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Segal, D. J., Dreier, B., Beerli, R. R., & Barbas, C. F.
- Affiliations
- The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology and the Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-03-16
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2758-2763
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review