PreprintCited by 1Genomics and Rare DiseasesProtein Structure and DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ProteoCast: a web server to predict, validate, and interpret missense variant effects

Open access
Abakarova, Marina, Freiberger, Maria Inés, Liehrmann, Arnaud, Rera, Michael, Laine, Elodie·2025·Journal of Molecular Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.jmb.2026.169657

Abstract

Understanding how mutations affect protein function remains critical yet challenging, particularly for variants in clinical databases lacking experimental characterisation and for intrinsically disordered regions. Current computational approaches often operate as black boxes, providing predictions without sufficient transparency or quality assessment of the underlying data. Here we present ProteoCast, a user-friendly web server that predicts variant effects through evolutionary constraint analysis and structural context integration. ProteoCast provides a three-tier variant classification (impactful, mild, neutral) to help prioritise mutations for clinical interpretation and experimental validation. It incorporates multiple sequence alignment quality controls to ensure prediction reliability and flag positions with insufficient evolutionary information. Beyond single-variant classification, ProteoCast employs a novel segmentation approach based on mutational sensitivity to identify functional linear peptides in disordered regions. Interactive visualisations guide users through results interpretation, from variant-level predictions to protein-wide functional landscapes. Evaluation on 63,000 ClinVar variants demonstrates 77% sensitivity and 87% specificity for pathogenicity prediction, with performance maintained across species (85% accuracy on Drosophila lethal mutations). ProteoCast successfully identifies twice as many functional motifs in intrinsically disordered regions compared to conservation-based phylogenetic methods. Predictions can be tuned to specific conformations, such as bound forms in protein complexes, for improved accuracy and interpretability. With its transparent, unsupervised methodology and computational efficiency (minutes per protein), ProteoCast democratises access to variant effect prediction and functional site discovery for the broader research community. The web server is freely available at: https://proteocast.ijm.fr/ . Highlights: ProteoCast web server democratises variant effect prediction through a fast, transparent platform combining evolutionary analysis and structural context Three-tier variant classification enables prioritisation for clinical interpretation and genome editing experiments Novel mutational sensitivity segmentation approach identifies functional peptides in disordered regions Interactive visualisations and input alignment quality controls guide interpretation

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.11.03.686214

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Matsvei Tsishyn , Pauline Hermans , Fabrizio Pucci , and Marianne Rooman . Residue conservation and solvent accessibility are (almost) all you need for predicting mutational effects in proteins. Pages: 2025.02.03.636212 Section: New Results. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Elodie Laine , Yasaman Karami , and Alessandra Carbone . GEMME: A simple and fast global epistatic model predicting mutational effects. 36(11):2604–2619. · DOI
  3. 2022, Rita: a study on scaling up generative protein sequence models, arXiv preprint
  4. Céline Marquet , Julius Schlensok , Marina Abakarova , Burkhard Rost , and Elodie Laine . Expert-guided protein language models enable accurate and blazingly fast fitness prediction. 40(11):btae621. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Konstantina Tzavella , Adrian Diaz , Catharina Olsen , and Wim Vranken . Combining evolution and protein language models for an interpretable cancer driver mutation prediction with d2deep. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 26(1), 2024. · DOI
  6. Lukas Gerasimavicius , Sarah A. Teichmann , and Joseph A. Marsh . Leveraging protein structural information to improve variant effect prediction. 92:103023. · DOI
  7. 10.1038/s41580-023-00673-0 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.032 · DOI
  9. 2025, Assessing variant effect predictors and disease mechanisms in intrinsically disordered proteins, PLOS Computational Biology, 21, e1013400, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013400 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1002/bies.10324 · DOI
  11. Celeste J Brown , Sachiko Takayama , Andrew M Campen , Pam Vise , Thomas W Marshall , Christopher J Oldfield , Christopher J Williams , and A Keith Dunker . Evolutionary rate heterogeneity in proteins with long disordered regions. Journal of molecular evolution, 55(1), 2002. · DOI
  12. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn664 · DOI
  13. Alex N. Nguyen Ba , Brian J. Yeh , Dewald van Dyk , Alan R. Davidson , Brenda J. Andrews , Eric L. Weiss , and Alan M. Moses . Proteome-wide discovery of evolutionary conserved sequences in disordered regions. 5(215):rs1–rs1. Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science. · DOI
  14. Norman E. Davey , Joanne L. Cowan , Denis C. Shields , Toby J. Gibson , Mark J. Coldwell , and Richard J. Edwards . SLiMPrints: conservation-based discovery of functional motif fingerprints in intrinsically disordered protein regions. 40(21):10628– 10641. · DOI
  15. Helen M. Berman , John Westbrook , Zukang Feng , Gary Gilliland , T. N. Bhat , Helge Weissig , Ilya N. Shindyalov , and Philip E. Bourne . The protein data bank. 28(1):235– 242.
  16. Arnaud Liehrmann , Etienne Delannoy , Alexandra Launay-Avon , Elodie Gilbault , Olivier Loudet , Benoît Castandet , and Guillem Rigaill . DiffSegR: an RNA-seq data driven method for differential expression analysis using changepoint detection. 5(4):qad098. · DOI
  17. Arnaud Liehrmann , Guillem Rigaill , and Toby Dylan Hocking . Increased peak detection accuracy in over-dispersed ChIP-seq data with supervised segmentation models. 22(1):323. · DOI
  18. Stefan Engelen , Ladislas A. Trojan , Sophie Sacquin-Mora , Richard Lavery , and Alessandra Carbone . Joint evolutionary trees: A large-scale method to predict protein interfaces based on sequence sampling. 5(1):e1000267. Publisher: Public Library of Science. · DOI
  19. Olivier Lichtarge , Henry R. Bourne , and Fred E. Cohen . An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. 257(2):342–358. · DOI
  20. Marina Abakarova , Maria Ines Freiberger , Arnaud Liehrmann , Michael Rera , and Elodie Laine . Proteome-wide prediction of the functional impact of missense variants with proteocast. bioRxiv, pages 2025–02, 2025. · DOI
  21. Robert Maidstone , Toby Hocking , Guillem Rigaill , and Paul Fearnhead . On optimal multiple changepoint algorithms for large data. 27(2):519–533. · DOI
  22. Peter Hall , JW Kay , and DM Titterington . Asymptotically optimal difference-based estimation of variance in nonparametric regression. 77(3):521–528. · DOI
  23. John Jumper , Richard Evans , Alexander Pritzel , Tim Green , Michael Figurnov , Olaf Ronneberger , Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool , Russ Bates , Augustin Žídek , Anna Potapenko , Alex Bridgland , Clemens Meyer , Simon A. A. Kohl , Andrew J. Ballard , Andrew Cowie , Bernardino Romera-Paredes , Stanislav Nikolov , Rishub Jain , Jonas Adler , Trevor Back , Stig Petersen , David Reiman , Ellen Clancy , Michal Zielinski , Martin Steinegger , Michalina Pacholska , Tamas Berghammer , Sebastian Bodenstein , David Silver , Oriol Vinyals , Andrew W. Senior , Koray Kavukcuoglu , Pushmeet Kohli , and Demis Hassabis . Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. 596(7873):583–589. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  24. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Marcin Wojdyr . GEMMI: A library for structural biology. 7(73):4200. · DOI
  27. 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90011-9 · DOI
  28. Melissa J. Landrum , Jennifer M. Lee , Mark Benson , Garth Brown , Chen Chao , Shanmuga Chitipiralla , Baoshan Gu , Jennifer Hart , Douglas Hoffman , Jeffrey Hoover , Wonhee Jang , Kenneth Katz , Michael Ovetsky , George Riley , Amanjeev Sethi , Ray Tully , Ricardo Villamarin-Salomon , Wendy Rubinstein , and Donna R. Maglott . ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. 44:D862–D868. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Trudy F. C. Mackay , Stephen Richards , Eric A. Stone , Antonio Barbadilla , Julien F. Ayroles , Dianhui Zhu , Sònia Casillas , Yi Han , Michael M. Magwire , Julie M. Cridland , Mark F. Richardson , Robert R. H. Anholt , Maite Barrón , Crystal Bess , Kerstin Petra Blankenburg , Mary Anna Carbone , David Castellano , Lesley Chaboub , Laura Duncan , Zeke Harris , Mehwish Javaid , Joy Christina Jayaseelan , Shalini N. Jhangiani , Katherine W. Jordan , Fremiet Lara , Faye Lawrence , Sandra L. Lee , Pablo Librado , Raquel S. Linheiro , Richard F. Lyman , Aaron J. Mackey , Mala Munidasa , Donna Marie Muzny , Lynne Nazareth , Irene Newsham , Lora Perales , Ling-Ling Pu , Carson Qu , Miquel Rámia , Jeffrey G. Reid , Stephanie M. Rollmann , Julio Rozas , Nehad Saada , Lavanya Turlapati , Kim C. Worley , Yuan-Qing Wu , Akihiko Yamamoto , Yiming Zhu , Casey M. Bergman , Kevin R. Thornton , David Mittelman , and Richard A. Gibbs . The drosophila melanogaster genetic reference panel. 482(7384):173–178. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group. · DOI
  30. Marina Abakarova , Céline Marquet , Michael Rera , Burkhard Rost , and Elodie Laine . Alignment-based protein mutational landscape prediction: Doing more with less. 15(11):evad201. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Milot Mirdita , Konstantin Schütze , Yoshitaka Moriwaki , Lim Heo , Sergey Ovchinnikov , and Martin Steinegger . ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. 19(6):679–682. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Pascal Notin , Lood Van Niekerk , Aaron W. Kollasch , Daniel Ritter , Yarin Gal , and Debora S. Marks . TranceptEVE: Combining family-specific and familyagnostic models of protein sequences for improved fitness prediction. Pages: 2022.12.07.519495 Section: New Results. · DOI
  33. Jonathan Frazer , Pascal Notin , Mafalda Dias , Aidan Gomez , Joseph K. Min , Kelly Brock , Yarin Gal , and Debora S. Marks . Disease variant prediction with deep generative models of evolutionary data. 599(7883):91–95. Number: 7883 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Manjeet Kumar , Sushama Michael , Jesús Alvarado-Valverde , András Zeke, Tamas Lazar , Juliana Glavina , Eszter Nagy-Kanta , Juan Mac Donagh , Zsofia E Kalman , Stefano Pascarelli , Nicolas Palopoli , László Dobson Carmen Florencia Suarez , Kim Van Roey , Izabella Krystkowiak , Juan Esteban Griffin , Anurag Nagpal , Rajesh Bhardwaj , Francesca Diella , Bálint Mészáros, Kellie Dean , Norman E Davey , Rita Pancsa , Lucía B Chemes , and Toby J Gibson . ELM—the eukaryotic linear motif resource—2024 update. 52:D442–D455. · DOI
  35. 10.1101/gad.17325211 · DOI
  36. 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3098 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/iub.1239 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/J.CELL.2020.08.012/ATTACHMENT/FE8D0017-8DE9-419E-A27E-E3764D796022/MMC3.ZIP · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nature07413 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1038/s41586-020-2180-5 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Abakarova, M., Freiberger, M. I., Liehrmann, A., Rera, M., & Laine, E.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Sorbonne Université, CNRS, IBPS, Department of Computational, Quantitative and Synthetic Biology (CQSB, UMR7238), 75005 Paris, France
  • Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR U1284, 75004 Paris, France
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-11-04
Volume
438
Issue
18
Pages
169657-169657
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7125524014
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Research Council (101087830)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
protein function, intrinsically disordered regions, structural context, variant interpretation, ClinVar variants, protein complexes, web server
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Software, Reproducibility of Results, Computational Biology, Mutation, Missense, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review