PreprintCited by 4

Epigenetic signatures of chronic social stress in stress-susceptible animals

O’Toole, Nicholas, Zhang, Tie-Yuan, Wen, Xianglan, Diorio, Josie, Silveira, Patricia P., Labonté, Benoit, Nestler, Eric J., Meaney, Michael J.·2019

Abstract

Exposure of mice to chronic social defeat stress (CSDS) produces depressive- and anxiety-like behaviors and widespread transcriptomic changes in several brain regions in susceptible animals. Here we present the first study of genome-wide cytosine methylation patterns of mice susceptible to CSDS using whole-genome bisulfite sequencing on DNA from the nucleus accumbens, a critical region for CSDS effects on behavior. We found extensive evidence for differential methylation following exposure to CSDS in susceptible animals, with a greater proportion of CG hypermethylation than hypomethylation in CSDS-susceptible mice compared to non-stressed controls; non-CG methylation shows the opposite trend. Several genes previously implicated in the effects of CSDS are among those with the greatest number of differentially methylated sites, including estrogen receptor alpha ( Esr1 ), the deleted in colorectal cancer ( Dcc ) gene and Cacna1c , which has been associated with a range of psychiatric conditions. Informatic analysis of DM sites revealed a gene network with ß-catenin as the hub gene of a network that included the ß-catenin-related WNT/frizzled signaling pathway as well as both Esr1 and Dcc . Finally, we found considerable overlap between DM genes associated with CSDS in susceptible animals and those associated with human neuroticism in a genome-wide association study. Analysis of these overlapping genes revealed ‘WNT signaling’ as the top pathway, which features ß-catenin as the primary hub gene. These findings reveal a striking convergence between the molecular pathways identified through either transcriptional or epigenomic analyses of the mouse model of susceptibility to chronic stress and the genomic architecture of increased stress susceptibility reflected in neuroticism in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/690826

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genes such as Est1, Cacna1c, and Dcc, associated with stress sensitivity and psychiatric disorders including MDD in humans, were significantly differentially methylated.

    “Genes (such as Est1 , Cacna1c , and Dcc ) associated with stress sensitivity and psychiatric disorders, including MDD in humans, 51 were significantly differentially methylated.”

    From Epigenetics and depression (2019) · cites this paper as [50]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Anacker, C., Luna, V., Millette, A. & Hen, R. 696. Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis Promotes Stress Resilience by Inhibiting Ventral Dentate Gyrus Activity. Biological Psychiatry 81, S282 (2017).
  2. Cholewa-Waclaw, J. et al. The Role of Epigenetic Mechanisms in the Regulation of Gene Expression in the Nervous System. The Journal of Neuroscience 36, 11427-11434 (2016).
  3. Lister, R. et al. Global epigenomic reconfiguration during mammalian brain development. Science 341, 1237905 (2013).
  4. Lorsch, Z. S. et al. Estrogen receptor α drives pro-resilient transcription in mouse models of depression. Nat. Commun. 9, 1116 (2018).
  5. Ziller, M. J. et al. Genomic distribution and inter-sample variation of non-CpG methylation across human cell types. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002389 (2011).
  6. Zhang, T.-Y. et al. Environmental enrichment increases transcriptional and epigenetic differentiation between mouse dorsal and ventral dentate gyrus. Nat. Commun. 9, 298 (2018).
  7. Ramsahoye, B. H. et al. Non-CpG methylation is prevalent in embryonic stem cells and may be mediated by DNA methyltransferase 3a. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 5237-5242 (2000).
  8. Shirane, K. et al. Mouse oocyte methylomes at base resolution reveal genome-wide accumulation of non- CpG methylation and role of DNA methyltransferases. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003439 (2013).
  9. Casamassima, F. et al. L-type calcium channels and psychiatric disorders: A brief review. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 153B, 1373-1390 (2010).
  10. Starnawska, A. et al. CACNA1C hypermethylation is associated with bipolar disorder. Transl. Psychiatry 6, e831 (2016).
  11. Walf, A. A. & Frye, C. A. A review and update of mechanisms of estrogen in the hippocampus and amygdala for anxiety and depression behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology 31, 1097-1111 (2006).
  12. Akalin, A. et al. methylKit: a comprehensive R package for the analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles. Genome Biol. 13, R87 (2012).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Toole, N., Zhang, T.-Y., Wen, X., Diorio, J., Silveira, P. P., Labonté, B., Nestler, E. J., & Meaney, M. J.
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2019-07-03
Cited by
4
References
5
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review