Cited by 2,199Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TP53 mutations in human cancers: origins, consequences, and clinical use.

Open access
Olivier, M., Hollstein, M., Hainaut, P.·2010·Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology

Abstract

Somatic mutations in the TP53 gene are one of the most frequent alterations in human cancers, and germline mutations are the underlying cause of Li-Fraumeni syndrome, which predisposes to a wide spectrum of early-onset cancers. Most mutations are single-base substitutions distributed throughout the coding sequence. Their diverse types and positions may inform on the nature of mutagenic mechanisms involved in cancer etiology. TP53 mutations are also potential prognostic and predictive markers, as well as targets for pharmacological intervention. All mutations found in human cancers are compiled in the IARC TP53 Database (http://www-p53.iarc.fr/). A human TP53 knockin mouse model (Hupki mouse) provides an experimental model to study mutagenesis in the context of a human TP53 sequence. Here, we summarize current knowledge on TP53 gene variations observed in human cancers and populations, and current clinical applications derived from this knowledge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/cshperspect.a001008

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 118 references

10 of the 118 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2,199

Metadata

Authors
Olivier, M., Hollstein, M., & Hainaut, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Venue
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology
Published
2009-11-11
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
a001008-a001008
ISSN
1943-0264 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129769331
Cited by
2,199
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 136 · 2025: 174 · 2024: 233 · 2023: 229 · 2022: 222 · 2021: 178 · 2020: 174 · 2019: 112 · 2018: 139 · 2017: 131 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 97 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 72
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
TP53 mutation, somatic mutations, germline TP53 mutation, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, cancer susceptibility, mutagenesis mechanism, prognostic factors, predictive biomarkers, therapeutic target, cancer etiology
MeSH terms
Animals, Carcinogens, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Models, Biological, Mutation, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Genes, p53, Mutagenesis, CpG Islands, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review