Cited by 487PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsCancer-related Molecular Pathways

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dissecting eIF4E action in tumorigenesis

Open access
Wendel, Hans-Guido, Silva, Ricardo L.A., Malina, Abba, Mills, John R., Zhu, Hong, Ueda, Takeshi, Watanabe-Fukunaga, Rie, Fukunaga, Rikiro, Teruya-Feldstein, Julie, Pelletier, Jerry, Lowe, Scott. W.·2007·Genes & Development

Abstract

Genetically engineered mouse models are powerful tools for studying cancer genes and validating targets for cancer therapy. We previously used a mouse lymphoma model to demonstrate that the translation initiation factor eIF4E is a potent oncogene in vivo. Using the same model, we now show that the oncogenic activity of eIF4E correlates with its ability to activate translation and become phosphorylated on Ser 209. Furthermore, constitutively activated MNK1, an eIF4E Ser 209 kinase, promotes tumorigenesis in a manner similar to eIF4E, and a dominant-negative MNK mutant inhibits the in vivo proliferation of tumor cells driven by mutations that deregulate translation. Phosphorylated eIF4E promotes tumorigenesis primarily by suppressing apoptosis and, accordingly, the anti-apoptotic protein Mcl-1 is one target of both phospho-eIF4E and MNK1 that contributes to tumor formation. Our results provide insight into how eIF4E contributes to tumorigenesis and pinpoint a level of translational control that may be suitable for therapeutic intervention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.1604407

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Efficient translation of MCL-1 mRNA requires cap-dependent translation in some cancers.

    “Previous studies had demonstrated that efficient translation of MCL-1 mRNA requires cap-dependent translation in some cancers (36–38).”

    From mTOR Inhibition Specifically Sensitizes Colorectal Cancers with KRAS or BRAF Mutations to BCL-2/BCL-XL Inhibition by Suppressing MCL-1 (2014) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Results and Discussion report that eIF4E and MNK1 increase Mcl-1 translation in the authors’ model and that phosphorylated eIF4E correlates with MCL-1 in human lymphomas. The paper connects eIF4E phosphorylation with cap-dependent translation, but it does not establish that efficient MCL-1 translation requires cap-dependent translation in those cancers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mamane, Y., Petroulakis, E., Martineau, Y., Sato, T.A., Larsson, O., Ra- jasekhar, V.K., and Sonenberg, N. 2007. Epigenetic activation of a subset of mRNAs by eIF4E explains its effects on cell proliferation. PLoS ONE 2: e242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000242. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wendel, H.-G., Silva, R. L. A., Malina, A., Mills, J. R., Zhu, H., Ueda, T., Watanabe-Fukunaga, R., Fukunaga, R., Teruya-Feldstein, J., Pelletier, J., & Lowe, S. W.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2007-11-30
Volume
21
Issue
24
Pages
000.2-000
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2132519593
Cited by
487
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 26
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
  • National Cancer Institute (P01CA087497, P01CA013106, P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
eIF4E, carcinogenesis, MNK1, translation initiation, oncogenic translation, mouse lymphoma model, apoptosis inhibition, Mcl-1, translational regulation, cancer therapy targets
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Cells, Cultured, Flow Cytometry, Mice, Transgenic, Neoplasm Proteins, Phosphorylation, Blotting, Western, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, DNA Primers, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2, Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-4E, Mice, Myeloid Cell Leukemia Sequence 1 Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review