The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 122 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 65 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth
Open accessAbstract
Growing tumors face two major metabolic challenges—how to meet the bioenergetic and biosynthetic demands of increased cell proliferation, and how to survive environmental fluctuations in external nutrient and oxygen availability when tumor growth outpaces the delivery capabilities of the existing vasculature. Cancer cells display dramatically altered metabolic circuitry that appears to directly result from the oncogenic mutations selected during the tumorigenic process. An emerging theme in cancer biology is that many of the genes that can initiate tumorigenesis are intricately linked to metabolic regulation. In turn, it appears that a number of well-established tumor suppressors play critical roles in suppressing growth and/or proliferation when intracellular supplies of essential metabolites become reduced. In this review, we consider the potential role of tumor suppressors as metabolic regulators.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that oncogenic and tumor suppressor networks reprogram cancer cell metabolism to support growth and proliferation while also enabling adaptation to metabolic stress. It focuses on glycolysis, mitochondrial biosynthesis, AMPK, p53, HIF1, and autophagy as interconnected metabolic regulators in tumorigenesis.
Key findings
- Proliferating cancer cells shift to aerobic glycolysis; >90% of pyruvate from glucose is converted to lactate by LDH-A, while the remaining ~10% enters mitochondria for biosynthetic pathways.
- Tumor suppressors including p53, LKB1, TSC2, PTEN, VHL, SDH, FH, and Beclin-1 act as metabolic brakes or adaptation regulators, whereas oncogenes such as PI3K/Akt, c-Myc, and HIF1 promote nutrient uptake, glycolysis, biosynthesis, and survival.
- AMPK is activated by energetic stress via LKB1 and can phosphorylate p53 at Ser-15, inducing a metabolic cell cycle checkpoint; in the absence of p53, metformin treatment delays tumor progression in cited work.
- Autophagy is a conserved metabolic stress response and tumor suppressor mechanism; Beclin-1 haploinsufficiency promotes tumorigenesis in mouse models and is associated with breast and ovarian cancers in humans, and ~30% of cancers cannot be detected by FDG-PET.
Methods
- Narrative review with no primary experimental data; it synthesizes literature on tumor suppressors and cell metabolism.
- No sample, dataset, or statistical analysis is reported; the article cites 116 references.
- Main analysis is a conceptual synthesis of oncogene/tumor suppressor signaling, metabolic pathways, and therapeutic implications.
Limitations
- The paper states that it remains debated whether metabolic changes are a consequence or cause of tumorigenesis; the exact contribution of AMPK to tumor progression is unclear; the stimuli and target genes for p53-dependent metabolic responses remain to be determined; and the role of p53 in autophagy remains controversial.
- Evident: as a narrative review, it does not systematically search or quantitatively synthesize evidence, and many mechanistic claims rely on cited studies rather than new data.
- Evident: tumor heterogeneity and context dependence may limit generalizability; the paper notes that individual tumor cells could display distinct metabolic signatures and that ~30% of cancers are FDG-PET negative.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
51 Own interpretation · 44 Not checked yet
In the paper
“tumor cells, in order to meet the increased requirements of proliferation, often display fundamental changes in pathways of energy metabolism and nutrient uptake (Garber 2006).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Garber 2006
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“tumor cells preferentially use glycolysis over mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) for glucose-dependent ATP production even in the presence of ample oxygen to fuel mitochondrial respiration, a phenomenon known as the ''Warburg effect'' (Warburg 1956).”
- Also stated in: § Glycolysis-metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation · plain
“One of the primary metabolic changes associated with proliferating tumor cells is induction of aerobic glycolysis (Fig. 1).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Warburg 1956
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Glycolysis-metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“supporting the theory that alterations in cellular metabolism may contribute to the malignant phenotype.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AMPK appears to function across evolution as a low energy checkpoint, triggering multiple biological adaptations designed to preserve energy and adapt to metabolic stress before the cell reaches a state of bioenergetic catastrophe that triggers cell death.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Metabolic adaptation by the AMPK
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the low overall percentage of pyruvate available for mitochondrial synthesis, the high rate of glycolytic flux provides sufficient amounts for biosynthesis.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > The mitochondrion-from engine to biosynthetic hub
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The remaining pyruvate from aerobic glycolysis that is not converted to lactate (~10% of total) enters the mitochondrion and is extruded from the TCA cycle at various steps for use in biosynthetic pathways.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To meet this challenge, metabolic activities are reorganized in proliferating cells resulting in an anabolic shift in cellular metabolism.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Glycolysis-metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“leading to the theory that oncogene and tumor suppressor networks influence the metabolic shift in cancer.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Tumor suppressors and oncogenes constitute metabolic signaling networks
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Without such a strategy, cells undergo apoptosis.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In particular, the c-Myc proto-oncogene is a potent regulator of multiple metabolic pathways essential for cancer growth (Dang et al. 2008).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Tumor suppressors and oncogenes constitute metabolic signaling networks
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dang et al. 2008
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Metabolic flux analysis has revealed that glutamine is used by proliferating cells to generate a pool of a-ketoglutarate, which can be metabolized through the TCA cycle to regenerate the OAA consumed by biosynthesis (DeBerardinis et al. 2007).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > The mitochondrion-from engine to biosynthetic hub
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites DeBerardinis et al. 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, in addition to its role as cellular energy center, the mitochondrion takes up a new role as a biosynthetic hub to meet the increased biosynthetic demand during proliferation, converting metabolites such as pyruvate and glutamine into intermediates utilized by other biosynthetic pathways (Fig. 1).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > The mitochondrion-from engine to biosynthetic hub
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The remaining pyruvate from aerobic glycolysis that is not converted to lactate (~10% of total) enters the mitochondrion and is extruded from the TCA cycle at various steps for use in biosynthetic pathways.
In the paper
“Recent data suggest that pyruvate kinase-M2 (PK-M2), an isoform of the rate-limiting enzyme for pyruvate generation that is preferentially expressed in tumor cells, regulates the flux of carbon into Rib-5-P and nucleotide synthesis (Christofk et al. 2008a).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Glycolysis-metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Christofk et al. 2008a
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“LKB1 is required for AMPK activation under conditions of bioenergetic stress including glucose withdrawal (Hawley et al. 2003;Woods et al. 2003;Shaw et al. 2004b).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Metabolic adaptation by the AMPK
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hawley et al. 2003
- Not checked yetcites Woods et al. 2003
- Not checked yetcites Shaw et al. 2004b
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a highly conserved heterotrimeric protein kinase complex that plays a central role in the regulation of cellular energy homeostasis, tethering the bioenergetic state of a cell to a number of critical biological functions aimed at preserving cellular energy and viability (Hardie 2007).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Metabolic adaptation by the AMPK
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hardie 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In contrast, the bioenergetic sensor AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylates the TSC1-TSC2 complex in an LKB-dependent fashion to promote mTOR inhibition (Inoki et al. 2003).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Tumor suppressors and oncogenes constitute metabolic signaling networks
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Inoki et al. 2003
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to energy, glycolysis generates metabolic intermediates important for cell growth.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Glycolysis-metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This may explain why glutamine is an essential metabolite for proliferation (Griffiths and Keast 1990).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > The mitochondrion-from engine to biosynthetic hub
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Griffiths and Keast 1990
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, maintaining high rates of glycolysis allows cells to meet the energetic and biosynthetic demands of anabolic growth.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Glycolysis-metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Metabolism of glucose through the oxidative or nonoxidative arms of the pentose phosphate pathway generates ribose-5-phosphate, a key intermediate in nucleotide biosynthesis.
- Rests on an assumption: The oxidative arm of the PPP can produce NADPH, which supplies a pool of reducing equivalents for both nucleotide and fatty acid biosynthesis.
- Rests on an assumption: Pyruvate can be imported into the mitochondria and converted into substrates for the production of additional amino acids or fatty acid synthesis, and used to maintain mitochondrial membrane potential.
In the paper
“several of the mutations that lead to cancer also drive the altered metabolism of tumor cells (Vogelstein and Kinzler 2004).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Vogelstein and Kinzler 2004
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, cell proliferation requires that bioenergetic resources and biosynthetic activity be redirected toward the duplication of all macromolecular components (DNA, membranes, and proteins) to ensure successful passage through the cell cycle.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Glycolysis-metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By converting pyruvate to lactate, LDH-A recovers the NAD + needed to maintain glycolysis.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Glycolysis-metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: In proliferating cancer cells, the majority (>90%) of pyruvate generated from glucose is converted to lactate by LDH-A and secreted rather than oxidized to completion.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Many prominent oncogenes including c-Myc, H-ras, src, and Akt stimulate anabolic metabolism in transformed cells (Dang and Semenza 1999;Elstrom et al. 2004).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Tumor suppressors and oncogenes constitute metabolic signaling networks
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dang and Semenza 1999
- Not checked yetcites Elstrom et al. 2004
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The majority of macromolecules required for proliferation (i.e., lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids) are generated de novo from glucose (Bauer et al. 2005).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > The mitochondrion-from engine to biosynthetic hub
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bauer et al. 2005
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Although the energetic yield per molecule of glucose is much lower for aerobic glycolysis compared with OXPHOS, when glucose is in excess and flux through the pathway high, glycolysis has the potential to produce ATP in greater quantities and at a faster rate (Guppy et al. 1993).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Glycolysis-metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Guppy et al. 1993
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Many of the predominant mutations observed in cancer also control tumor cell metabolism (Vogelstein and Kinzler 2004)”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Tumor suppressors and oncogenes constitute metabolic signaling networks
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Vogelstein and Kinzler 2004
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a growing tumor with increased metabolic demands outstrips nutrient supply, it must enact a strategy to maintain cellular bioenergetics lest cell growth, proliferation, or viability be affected.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The decision to proliferate presents a significant bioenergetic challenge for a cell.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Glycolysis-metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, increased metabolic potential, while beneficial for unchecked growth, poses an inherent challenge for malignant cells.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By regulating the amount of pyruvate generated by glycolysis, PK-M2 functions to direct the flow of carbon into pathways of nucleotide and fatty acid biosynthesis that support the proliferation of tumor cells.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Glycolysis-metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“inhibition of mTOR-dependent protein translation through the regulation of the TSC1-TSC2 complex or the mTORbinding protein Raptor (Inoki et al. 2003;Corradetti et al. 2004;Shaw et al. 2004a;Gwinn et al. 2008)”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Metabolic adaptation by the AMPK
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Inoki et al. 2003
- Not checked yetcites Corradetti et al. 2004
- Not checked yetcites Shaw et al. 2004a
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This step is critical for the maintenance of tumor proliferation in vivo (Fantin et al. 2006).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Glycolysis-metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fantin et al. 2006
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interestingly, the enzymatic activity of PK-M2 is negatively regulated by phosphotyrosine signaling downstream from growth receptors (Christofk et al. 2008b).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Glycolysis-metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Christofk et al. 2008b
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“These include inhibition of lipid synthesis by Acetyl-CoA carboxylase-1 (ACC1) phosphorylation (Davies et al. 1990)”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Metabolic adaptation by the AMPK
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Davies et al. 1990 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Together, mutations in PI3K signaling constitute one of the most common sets of mutations in human tumors (Shaw and Cantley 2006).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Tumor suppressors and oncogenes constitute metabolic signaling networks
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shaw and Cantley 2006
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Akt regulates mTOR function by phosphorylating and inhibiting TSC2, which in turn disrupts the function of the TSC1-TSC2 complex, promoting mTOR activation (Inoki et al. 2002).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Tumor suppressors and oncogenes constitute metabolic signaling networks
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Inoki et al. 2002
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Glucose is a critical nutrient for proliferating cells (Holley and Kiernan 1974;Pardee 1974).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Glycolysis-metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Holley and Kiernan 1974
- Not checked yetcites Pardee 1974
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The emergence of metabolic enzymes (i.e., PK-M2, LDHA, SDH, FH, PDK1, and IDH1) as important regulators of cancer cell growth suggests that metabolic control is a key element of tumor progression.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When combined with the loss of tumor suppressors that promote metabolic adaptation, cancer cells risk developing greater sensitivity to bio-energetic stress.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Oncogenic pathways that promote proliferation and survival in normal cells confer ''metabolic permission'' in transformed cells by stimulating bioenergetic pathways and anabolic growth.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The importance of autophagy in tumor suppression may actually stem from its role in the degradation of long-lived proteins and organelles, rather than its role in stress responses.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Autophagy as a tumor suppressor mechanism
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“while cytoplasmic p53 appears to function as a negative regulator of autophagy (Tasdemir et al. 2008a,b).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Autophagy as a tumor suppressor mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tasdemir et al. 2008a,b
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From this logic, oncogenedriven signal transduction may promote greater dependence on specific metabolic pathways such as glycolysis to maintain tumor growth.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Cancer cells can become dependent on the activity of a specific oncogene for function and survival (oncogene addiction).
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AMPK-dependent p53 activation negatively regulates cell cycle progression via the cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) inhibitor p21.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intracellular sensors of energy, nutrients, and oxygen promote metabolic adaptation to stress during tumorigenesis.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“or through the regulation of macroautophagy (Buzzai et al. 2007; J. Liang et al. 2007;Lippai et al. 2008).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Metabolic adaptation by the AMPK
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reprogramming of core metabolism in tumors confers a selective growth advantage (i.e., enhanced proliferation, resistance to apoptosis) that promotes tumor progression.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Beclin-1 haploinsufficiency promotes tumorigenesis in mouse models and is associated with breast and ovarian cancers in humans (Aita et al. 1999;Liang et al. 1999;Qu et al. 2003).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Autophagy as a tumor suppressor mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aita et al. 1999
- Not checked yetcites Liang et al. 1999
- Not checked yetcites Qu et al. 2003
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the fact that metabolic enzymes such as SDH and FH function as tumor suppressors in humans suggests that metabolic deregulation can be an initiating event in cancer.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: SDH and FH function as tumor suppressors in humans.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The interaction of AMPK with several transcription factors indicates that transcriptional regulation may be central to AMPK-dependent stress responses.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Metabolic adaptation by the AMPK
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Oncogene pathways including Akt, mTOR, and Bcl2 appear to function as inhibitors of autophagy, while tumor suppressors including PTEN, TSC2, LKB1, and HIF1a promote autophagy (Maiuri et al. 2009).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Autophagy as a tumor suppressor mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Maiuri et al. 2009
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“which may explain why metformin, an antidiabetic therapy, can be anti-tumorigenic (Evans et al. 2005;Huang et al. 2008).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Evans et al. 2005
- Not checked yetcites Huang et al. 2008
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies involving Beclin-1, which is required for autophagy induction in mammalian cells, suggest that autophagy functions as an important tumor suppressor mechanism.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Autophagy as a tumor suppressor mechanism
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Beclin-1 is required for autophagy induction in mammalian cells.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a consequence, tumor cells must undergo a period of metabolic adaptation to survive this metabolic stress or undergo apoptosis.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Low O 2 , ROS, or accumulation of the TCA substrates succinate or fumarate promotes HIF1a protein stabilization and transcriptional activity.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“This metabolic stress response is reinforced by the p53 target genes sestrin1 and sestrin2, which activate AMPK as part of a feedback loop (Budanov and Karin 2008).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Metabolic adaptation by the AMPK
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Budanov and Karin 2008
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Oncogene pathways including Akt, mTOR, and Bcl2 appear to function as inhibitors of autophagy, while tumor suppressors including PTEN, TSC2, LKB1, and HIF1a promote autophagy (Maiuri et al. 2009).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Autophagy as a tumor suppressor mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Maiuri et al. 2009
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“p53 activation has been shown to promote autophagy in response to stress through transcriptional control of autophagy regulators such as DRAM (Crighton et al. 2006)”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Autophagy as a tumor suppressor mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Crighton et al. 2006
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The emergence of metabolic enzymes (i.e., PK-M2, LDHA, SDH, FH, PDK1, and IDH1) as important regulators of cancer cell growth suggests that metabolic control is a key element of tumor progression.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The metabolic response of an individual tumor cell is dependent on both the combination of oncogenic and/or tumor suppressor mutations and the environmental conditions (nutrient depletion, hypoxia) encountered within the tumor microenvironment.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While much attention has been paid to the prevalence of aerobic glycolytic ''Warburg'' metabolism in cancer, the metabolic pathways that support cell growth during tumorigenesis are likely far more complex.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Oncogenic transformation or loss of tumor suppressor function drives unchecked growth and proliferation in cancer cells, which often coincide with both an increase in bioenergetic potential and the ability to take up nutrients in a cell-autonomous fashion.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Beclin-1 haploinsufficiency promotes tumorigenesis in mouse models and is associated with breast and ovarian cancers in humans (Aita et al. 1999;Liang et al. 1999;Qu et al. 2003).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Autophagy as a tumor suppressor mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aita et al. 1999
- Not checked yetcites Liang et al. 1999
- Not checked yetcites Qu et al. 2003
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the role of p53 in autophagy induction may depend on its cellular localization, transcriptional activity, and mechanism of activation.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Autophagy as a tumor suppressor mechanism
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tumor suppressors such as p53, LKB1, and TSC2 function as a brake on cell growth by antagonizing many of the same biosynthetic pathways stimulated by oncogenes under conditions of limiting intracellular glucose or amino acid supplies.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“while antiapoptotic Bcl-2 inhibits Beclin-1 function (Pattingre et al. 2005).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Autophagy as a tumor suppressor mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pattingre et al. 2005
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Activation of the tumor suppressor p53 by AMPK promotes physiological adaptation to metabolic stress by multiple mechanisms.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Angiogenesis and neovascularization of the tumor is one strategy of metabolic adaptation used by tumors to relieve this stress.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A solid tumor can outstrip its nutrient and oxygen supply as it grows, resulting in metabolic stress (tumors experiencing metabolic stress are depicted in gray).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Oncogenic transformation or loss of tumor suppressor function drives unchecked growth and proliferation in cancer cells, which often coincide with both an increase in bioenergetic potential and the ability to take up nutrients in a cell-autonomous fashion.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which may explain why metformin, an antidiabetic therapy, can be anti-tumorigenic (Evans et al. 2005;Huang et al. 2008).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, the ability of tumor cells to survive metabolic stress in vivo requires AMPK-dependent activation of p53 (Buzzai et al. 2007)”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Buzzai et al. 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“As with metabolic transformation, oncogene and tumor suppressor pathways display opposing effects on autophagy.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Autophagy as a tumor suppressor mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Maiuri et al. 2009
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Impairment of glycolytic flux by TIGAR, combined with increased activation of b-oxidation and electron transport through expression of carnitine palmitoyltransferase Ic (Cpt1c) and SCO2, respectively, results in a p53-dependent metabolic shift toward OXPHOS.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 16
- Probably not a substantial claim. 6
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Enhanced glucose uptake visualized by FDG-PET correlates with poor prognosis and higher metabolic potential in many tumor types (Gatenby and Gillies 2004;Kroemer and Pouyssegur 2008)”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gatenby and Gillies 2004
- Not checked yetcites Kroemer and Pouyssegur 2008
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, tumors face two distinct metabolic challenges: (1) how to modify their cellular metabolism to support enhanced cell growth and proliferation, and (2) how to engage strategies of metabolic adaptation to survive periods of metabolic stress and maintain viability as the cells accumulate.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“AMPK is responsive to changes in the cellular AMP:ATP ratio and is activated by stresses that stimulate ATP consumption or inhibit ATP production (Hardie 2003).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Metabolic adaptation by the AMPK
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hardie 2003
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Oncogenic c-Myc promotes increased aerobic glycolysis through the constitutive elevation of LDH-A (Shim et al. 1997;Osthus et al. 2000), as well as expression of enzymes involved in nucleotide and amino acid metabolism (Gordan et al. 2007).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Tumor suppressors and oncogenes constitute metabolic signaling networks
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shim et al. 1997
- Not checked yetcites Osthus et al. 2000
- Not checked yetcites Gordan et al. 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This fundamental metabolic switch (''metabolic transformation'') may confer a selective growth advantage and/or resistance to apoptosis to allow cancer cells to maintain mitochondrial bioenergetics and integrity during cell growth and proliferation (DeBerardinis et al. 2008).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites DeBerardinis et al. 2008
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Activity of the pathway is deregulated in cancer through a variety of mechanisms, including activating mutations in PI3K (Samuels et al. 2004(Samuels et al. , 2005;;Jia et al. 2008) or PTEN loss (Cairns et al. 1997).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Tumor suppressors and oncogenes constitute metabolic signaling networks
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Samuels et al. 2004
- Not checked yetcites Samuels et al. 2005
- Not checked yetcites Jia et al. 2008
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Inhibition of ACL results in decreased glucose-dependent lipid synthesis and impaired cell proliferation (Hatzivassiliou et al. 2005).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > The mitochondrion-from engine to biosynthetic hub
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hatzivassiliou et al. 2005
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Protein translation is essential for tumor growth, and deregulated translation itself can be tumorigenic (Mamane et al. 2004).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Tumor suppressors and oncogenes constitute metabolic signaling networks
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mamane et al. 2004
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Interestingly, Myc transformed cells are exquisitely sensitive to glutamine levels and rapidly deplete their TCA cycle intermediates when glutamine availability is reduced (Yuneva et al. 2007).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Tumor suppressors and oncogenes constitute metabolic signaling networks
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yuneva et al. 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“TORC1 activity is kept in check by the tumor suppressors TSC1/ TSC2 and LKB1, which function to block mTOR activation through inhibition of the small GTPase Rheb; mutation of these genes leads to elevated mTOR activity and the development of hamartomas (Inoki et al. 2003;Corradetti et al. 2004;Shaw et al. 2004a).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Tumor suppressors and oncogenes constitute metabolic signaling networks
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Inoki et al. 2003
- Not checked yetcites Corradetti et al. 2004
- Not checked yetcites Shaw et al. 2004a
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Major physiological strategies of metabolic adaptation include cell cycle inhibition, inhibition of biosynthetic pathways (lipid, protein synthesis), increases in bioenergetic pathways (b-oxidation, glycolysis, and OXPHOS), and induction of autophagy.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“HIF1a blocks pyruvate entry into the mitochondrion by up-regulating the PDH antagonist PDK1.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AMPK mediates metabolic adaptation through several pathways, including down-regulation of fatty acid synthesis through inhibition of ACC1, translation inhibition by blocking TORC1 activity, and activation of p53.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Transcriptional regulation of DRAM by p53 induces autophagy, the products of which can also fuel OXPHOS.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Failure to manage or correct bioenergetic imbalance leads to cytochrome c release from mitochondria and induction of apoptosis.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Other modifiers of Beclin-1 activity such as UVRAG and Bif display tumor suppressor properties (C.Liang et al. 2007;Takahashi et al. 2007)”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Autophagy as a tumor suppressor mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites C.Liang et al. 2007 source
- Not checked yetcites Takahashi et al. 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“AMPK phosphorylates p53 at Ser-15, which stimulates both its transcriptional activity and initiates a metabolic cell cycle checkpoint (Jones et al. 2005).”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Metabolic adaptation by the AMPK
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jones et al. 2005
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Bioenergetic stress activates AMPK through an LKB-dependent manner.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Low HIF1a protein levels are maintained in cells under normoxia through the action of VHL-mediated proteosomal degradation.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rag GTPases regulate TORC1 activity and autophagy in response to amino acid deprivation.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, any subsequent inability to induce autophagy under conditions of nutrient or oxygen deprivation could render tumors more susceptible to apoptosis by metabolic stress.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Autophagy as a tumor suppressor mechanism
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“LKB or p53 deficiency, while permissive for unchecked cell growth, renders cells more susceptible to death by metabolic stress.”
§ Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth > Conclusions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
In proliferating cancer cells, the majority (>90%) of pyruvate generated from glucose is converted to lactate by LDH-A and secreted rather than oxidized to completion.
“In proliferating cancer cells, the majority of the pyruvate generated from glucose (>90%) is converted to lactate by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH-A), where it is readily secreted into the extracellular environment rather than oxidized to completion.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Metabolism of glucose through the oxidative or nonoxidative arms of the pentose phosphate pathway generates ribose-5-phosphate, a key intermediate in nucleotide biosynthesis.
“Metabolism of glucose through the oxidative or nonoxidative arms of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) generates ribose-5phosphate (Rib-5-P), a key intermediate in nucleotide biosynthesis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The oxidative arm of the PPP can produce NADPH, which supplies a pool of reducing equivalents for both nucleotide and fatty acid biosynthesis.
“The oxidative arm of the PPP can also produce NADPH, which supplies a pool of reducing equivalents for both nucleotide and fatty acid biosynthesis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Pyruvate can be imported into the mitochondria and converted into substrates for the production of additional amino acids or fatty acid synthesis, and used to maintain mitochondrial membrane potential.
“Finally, pyruvate can be imported into the mitochondria and converted into substrates for the production of additional amino acids or fatty acid synthesis, and used to maintain mitochondrial membrane potential.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The remaining pyruvate from aerobic glycolysis that is not converted to lactate (~10% of total) enters the mitochondrion and is extruded from the TCA cycle at various steps for use in biosynthetic pathways.
“The remaining pyruvate from aerobic glycolysis that is not converted to lactate (;10% of total) enters the mitochondrion and is extruded from the TCA cycle at various steps for use in biosynthetic pathways.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A solid tumor can outstrip its nutrient and oxygen supply as it grows, resulting in metabolic stress.
“A solid tumor can outstrip its nutrient and oxygen supply as it grows, resulting in metabolic stress (tumors experiencing metabolic stress are depicted in gray).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Tumor cells must undergo a period of metabolic adaptation to survive metabolic stress or undergo apoptosis.
“As a consequence, tumor cells must undergo a period of metabolic adaptation to survive this metabolic stress or undergo apoptosis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
PI3K is a central regulator of metabolism in both nontransformed and transformed cells.
“A central regulator of metabolism in both nontransformed and transformed cells is the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), a lipid kinase that regulates the levels of phosphorylated phosphatidylinositol (PIP 3 ) at the plasma membrane.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Growth factor-dependent activation of PI3K leads to activation of downstream effectors including Akt and mTOR that coordinate metabolic activities supporting cellular biosynthesis.
“Growth factor-dependent activation of PI3K leads to the activation of downstream effectors including Akt and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) that coordinate metabolic activities that support cellular biosynthesis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
mTOR coordinates protein synthesis by regulating amino acid uptake, tRNA charging, and translation initiation.
“mTOR coordinates protein synthesis by regulating amino acid uptake, tRNA charging, and translation initiation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Myc is a transcription factor activated by growth factor stimulation and is essential for the regulation of proliferation and cell cycle entry in nontransformed cells.
“Myc is a transcription factor activated by growth factor stimulation and is essential for the regulation of proliferation and cell cycle entry in nontransformed cells.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AMPK is activated under conditions of energetic stress, such as that triggered by nutrient deprivation or hypoxia.
“As a cellular sensor of AMP levels, AMPK is activated under conditions of energetic stress, such as that triggered by nutrient deprivation or hypoxia.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Beclin-1 is required for autophagy induction in mammalian cells.
“Studies involving Beclin-1, which is required for autophagy induction in mammalian cells, suggest that autophagy functions as an important tumor suppressor mechanism.”
The paper relies on this without support.
SDH and FH function as tumor suppressors in humans.
“However, the fact that metabolic enzymes such as SDH and FH function as tumor suppressors in humans suggests that metabolic deregulation can be an initiating event in cancer.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cancer cells can become dependent on the activity of a specific oncogene for function and survival (oncogene addiction).
“In cancer cells, a given transformation event (i.e., oncogene activation) may play a qualitatively different or essential role in a given pathway compared with its role in normal cells, such that cancer cells become dependent on the activity of a specific oncogene for function and survival, a concept known as oncogene addiction.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Tumor-promoting mutations in these genes tend to converge on a metabolic phenotype of enhanced glycolysis and energy production, thereby contributing to self-sufficiency of growth and evasion of growth-suppressive signals.”
From Cellular Metabolism and Disease: What Do Metabolic Outliers Teach Us? (2012) · cites this paper as Jones and Thompson, 2009
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It is known that cancer cells preferentially use glycolysis instead of respiration to obtain energy (Warburg effect) (20).”
From Mitochondrial Dysfunction Contributes to Oncogene-Induced Senescence (2009) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Cellular transformation is a multistep process requiring acquisition of activated oncogenes and loss of tumor-suppressor genes, leading to usurpation of cellular signaling pathways controlling proliferation, survival, and metabolism 65, 66.”
From Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species regulate cellular signaling and dictate biological outcomes (2010) · cites this paper as [66]
In the citing paper
“First, many human oncogenes and tumor suppressors regulate glucose metabolism (Figure 3A) (DeBerardinis, 2008; Jones and Thompson, 2009).”
From Cellular Metabolism and Disease: What Do Metabolic Outliers Teach Us? (2012) · cites this paper as Jones and Thompson, 2009
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED: Elevated tRNAiMet Synthesis Can Drive Cell Proliferation and Oncogenic Transformation
Marshall, L., Kenneth, N. S., & White, R. J. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.035 · Cited by 134
RetractedWarburg, O. (1956) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.123.3191.309 · Cited by 13,425
p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division
Levine, A. J. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81871-1 · Cited by 7,693
Vogelstein, B., Lane, D., & Levine, A. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35042675 · Cited by 6,607 · cited 1×
“In response to diverse cellular insults including DNA damage, hypoxia, and oxidative stress, p53 becomes post-translationally modified, which promotes both its stabilization and activation, and activates the expression of genes that induce cell cycle arrest, senescence, and apoptosis (Vogelstein et al. 2000).”
BackgroundAn Integrated Genomic Analysis of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme
Parsons, D. W., Jones, S., Zhang, X., Lin, J. C.-H., Leary, R. J., Angenendt, P., Mankoo, P., Carter, H., Siu, I.-M., Gallia, G. L., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1164382 · Cited by 5,857
TOR signaling in growth and metabolism
Wullschleger, S., Loewith, R., & Hall, M. N. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.016 · Cited by 5,787
Why Do Cancers Have High Aerobic Glycolysis?
Gatenby, R. A., & Gillies, R. J. (2004) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1478 · Cited by 4,784
Cancer genes and the pathways they control
Vogelstein, B., & Kinzler, K. W. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1087 · Cited by 4,346
The Biology of Cancer: Metabolic Reprogramming Fuels Cell Growth and Proliferation
DeBerardinis, R. J., Lum, J. J., Hatzivassiliou, G., & Thompson, C. B. (2008) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.002 · Cited by 4,088
Self-citationTSC2 Mediates Cellular Energy Response to Control Cell Growth and Survival
Inoki, K., Zhu, T., & Guan, K.-L. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00929-2 · Cited by 3,914
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation
Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 · Cited by 66,590
Modulation of oxidative stress as an anticancer strategy
Gorrini, C., Harris, I. S., & Mak, T. W. (2013) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4002 · Cited by 3,579
Blinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53
Vousden, K. H., & Prives, C. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.037 · Cited by 3,163
Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)-Based Nanomedicine
Yang, B., Chen, Y., & Shi, J. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00626 · Cited by 2,477
Wallace, D. C. (2012) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3365 · Cited by 2,404
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, R. G., & Thompson, C. B.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Abramson Cancer Center (US)
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2009-03-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 537-548
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- PMC
- PMC2763495
- OpenAlex
- W2127049578
- Semantic Scholar
- f40e1cdc46be710b4cc935547b39b521d22208fa
- Cited by
- 1,085
- References
- 122
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 100 · 2013: 97 · 2012: 87
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- McGill University
- National Institutes of Health
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA105463)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
- Keywords
- tumor suppressor, cancer metabolism, tumor growth, oncogenic mutations, metabolic regulation, cell proliferation, nutrient availability, oxygen availability, tumor vasculature, biosynthesis, bioenergetics
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Autophagy, Cells, Glycolysis, Humans, Mitochondria, Neoplasms, Oncogenes, Signal Transduction, Genes, Tumor Suppressor, Cell Proliferation, AMP-Activated Protein Kinases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review