PreprintCited by 177Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsRNA Research and SplicingNuclear Structure and Function

The multifunctional Ccr4–Not complex directly promotes transcription elongation

Open access
Kruk, Jennifer A., Dutta, Arnob, Fu, Jianhua, Gilmour, David S., Reese, Joseph C.·2011·Genes & Development

Abstract

The Ccr4–Not complex has been implicated in the control of multiple steps of mRNA metabolism; however, its functions in transcription remain ambiguous. The discovery that Ccr4/Pop2 is the major cytoplasmic mRNA deadenylase and the detection of Not proteins within mRNA processing bodies have raised questions about the roles of the Ccr4–Not complex in transcription. Here we firmly establish Ccr4–Not as a positive elongation factor for RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). The Ccr4–Not complex is targeted to the coding region of genes in a transcription-dependent manner similar to RNAPII and promotes elongation in vivo. Furthermore, Ccr4–Not interacts directly with elongating RNAPII complexes and stimulates transcription elongation of arrested polymerase in vitro. Ccr4–Not can reactivate backtracked RNAPII using a mechanism different from that of the well-characterized elongation factor TFIIS. While not essential for its interaction with elongation complexes, Ccr4–Not interacts with the emerging transcript and promotes elongation in a manner dependent on transcript length, although this interaction is not required for it to bind RNAPII. Our comprehensive analysis shows that Ccr4–Not directly regulates transcription, and suggests it does so by promoting the resumption of elongation of arrested RNAPII when it encounters transcriptional blocks in vivo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.2020911

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In yeast, genes are quite short (around 1.5-2 kb long on average), although the gene YLR454W used for most experiments measuring RNA Pol II speed in budding yeast is exceptionally large with a size of around 8 kb.

    “In yeast, genes are quite short (around 1.5–2 kb long on average, although the gene YLR454W, used for most of the experiments measuring RNA Pol II speed in budding yeast, is exceptionally large with a size of around 8 kb (Table 2) (Mason & Struhl, 2005; Quan & Hartzog, 2010; Kruk et al, 2011; García et al, 2012)).”

    From RNA polymerase II speed: a key player in controlling and adapting transcriptome composition (2021) · cites this paper as Kruk et al, 2011

    The ‘Ccr4-Not stimulates elongation in vivo’ section uses GAL1p-YLR454W to examine RNA polymerase II progression, with measurements at positions through 6 kb. Our copy does not state that yeast genes average 1.5–2 kb, give YLR454W’s length as approximately 8 kb, or establish that it is used in most budding-yeast polymerase-speed experiments. Page numbers are unavailable in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Ccr4-Not complex can accelerate transcription through reactivation of backtracked RNA Pol II.

    “Another factor which can accelerate transcription through reactivation of backtracked RNA Pol II is the Ccr4‐Not complex (Kruk et al, 2011), which is considered a master regulator of eukaryotic gene expression.”
  • The Ccr4-Not complex is thought to push RNA Pol II forward through binding to the nascent RNA until realignment of the 3′ end of the nascent transcript in the active site.

    “The Ccr4‐Not complex is instead thought to push RNA Pol II forward through binding to the nascent RNA until realignment of the 3′ end of the nascent transcript in the active site (Kruk et al, 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kruk, J. A., Dutta, A., Fu, J., Gilmour, D. S., & Reese, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2011-03-15
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
581-593
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2138461551
Cited by
177
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM047477, GM 47477, R01GM100997, GM58672, R01GM058672)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
Keywords
CCR4-NOT complex, transcription elongation, RNA polymerase II, elongation arrest
MeSH terms
Protein Binding, RNA Polymerase II, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Transcriptional Elongation Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review