The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Position effect variegation in Drosophila is associated with an altered chromatin structure.
Open accessAbstract
A euchromatic gene placed in the vicinity of heterochromatin by a chromosomal rearrangement generally exhibits position effect variegation (PEV), a clonally inherited pattern showing gene expression in some somatic cells but not in others. The mechanism responsible for this loss of gene expression is investigated here using fly lines carrying a P element containing the Drosophila melanogaster white and hsp26 genes. Following mobilization of the P element, a screen for variegation of white expression recovered inserts at pericentric, telomeric, and fourth chromosome regions. Previously identified suppressors of PEV suppressed white variegation of pericentric and fourth chromosome inserts but not telomeric inserts on the second and third chromosomes. This implies a difference in the mechanism for gene repression at telomeres. Heat shock-induced hsp26 expression was reduced from pericentric and fourth chromosome inserts but not from telomeric inserts. Chromatin structure analysis revealed that the variegating inserts showed a reduction in accessibility to restriction enzyme digestion in the hsp26 regulatory region in isolated nuclei. Micrococcal nuclease digests showed that pericentric inserts were packaged in a more regular nucleosome array than that observed for euchromatic inserts. These data suggest that altered chromatin packaging plays a role in PEV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Action in the X-chromosome of the Mouse (Mus musculus L.)
LYON, M. F. (1961) · Nature · doi:10.1038/190372a0 · Cited by 3,978
Eissenberg, J. C., Morris, G. D., Reuter, G., & Hartnett, T. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/131.2.345 · Cited by 315
Position effect variegation and chromatin proteins
Reute, G., & Spierer, P. (1992) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.950140907 · Cited by 309
Dorn, R., Krauss, V, Reuter, G., & Saumweber, H. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.23.11376 · Cited by 178
Cited by
Chromatin accessibility and the regulatory epigenome
Klemm, S. L., Shipony, Z., & Greenleaf, W. J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0089-8 · Cited by 1,793
Long-Range Control of Gene Expression: Emerging Mechanisms and Disruption in Disease
Kleinjan, D. A., & van Heyningen, V. (2005) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/426833 · Cited by 873
The BDGP Gene Disruption Project
Bellen, H. J., Levis, R. W., Liao, G., He, Y., Carlson, J. W., Tsang, G., Evans-Holm, M., Hiesinger, P. R., Schulze, K. L., Rubin, G. M., et al. (2004) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.104.026427 · Cited by 873
Histones: annotating chromatin
Campos, E. I., & Reinberg, D. (2009) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.032608.103928 · Cited by 852
Schotta, G., Ebert, A., Krauss, V., Fischer, A., Hoffmann, J., Rea, S., Jenuwein, T., Dorn, R., & Reuter, G. (2002) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/21.5.1121 · Cited by 714
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallrath, L. L., & Elgin, S. C.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1995-05-15
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1263-1277
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2018420071
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Position effect variegation in Drosophila is associated with an altered chromatin structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.9.10.1263
- The paper
- Wallrath, L. L., & Elgin, S. C. (1995). Position effect variegation in Drosophila is associated with an altered chromatin structure. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.9.10.1263
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.