Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Copy number variation and evolution in humans and chimpanzees

Perry, George H., Yang, Fengtang, Marques-Bonet, Tomas, Murphy, Carly, Fitzgerald, Tomas, Lee, Arthur S., Hyland, Courtney, Stone, Anne C., Hurles, Matthew E., Tyler-Smith, Chris, Eichler, Evan E., Carter, Nigel P., Lee, Charles, Redon, Richard·2008·Genome Research

Abstract

Copy number variants (CNVs) underlie many aspects of human phenotypic diversity and provide the raw material for gene duplication and gene family expansion. However, our understanding of their evolutionary significance remains limited. We performed comparative genomic hybridization on a single human microarray platform to identify CNVs among the genomes of 30 humans and 30 chimpanzees as well as fixed copy number differences between species. We found that human and chimpanzee CNVs occur in orthologous genomic regions far more often than expected by chance and are strongly associated with the presence of highly homologous intrachromosomal segmental duplications. By adapting population genetic analyses for use with copy number data, we identified functional categories of genes that have likely evolved under purifying or positive selection for copy number changes. In particular, duplications and deletions of genes with inflammatory response and cell proliferation functions may have been fixed by positive selection and involved in the adaptive phenotypic differentiation of humans and chimpanzees.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.082016.108

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00294-2 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/75556 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.tig.2004.11.001 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/hmg/ddm197 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nrg1895 · DOI
  6. 10.1101/gr.GR-1871R · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.1072047 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nrg2193 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/ng2042 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/ng2054 · DOI
  11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000085 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.0709888104 · DOI
  13. 10.1101/gr.6557307 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/ng.2007.19 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/ng2046 · DOI
  16. 10.1101/gr.5630906 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nprot.2007.53 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.033 · DOI
  19. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020207 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s00439-005-0130-9 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.1101160 · DOI
  22. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030003 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/ng.141 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/9674 · DOI
  25. 10.1534/genetics.107.080077 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.05.009 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00108-2 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/ng.2007.9 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.0605426103 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/nar/gkg129 · DOI
  31. 10.1126/science.1126531 · DOI
  32. 10.1042/BST0351508 · DOI
  33. 10.1126/science.1149504 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1006/cyto.2002.0873 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/335268a0 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/hmg/ddn002 · DOI
  37. 10.1101/gr.1003303 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/351652a0 · DOI
  39. 10.1042/BJ20021892 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020020 · DOI
  41. 10.1101/gr.077289.108 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.0709956104 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/nrmicro1428 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1073/pnas.0602318103 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.12.010 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02781-6 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/nature05329 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/nature02451 · DOI
  49. 10.1126/science.1098918 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1073/pnas.012364999 · DOI
  51. 10.1126/science.1136678 · DOI
  52. 10.1073/pnas.0609902104 · DOI
  53. 10.1074/jbc.M800234200 · DOI
  54. 10.1086/342727 · DOI
  55. 10.1073/pnas.0502300102 · DOI
  56. 10.1101/gr.4456006 · DOI
  57. 10.1086/503116 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.07.005 · DOI
  59. 10.1073/pnas.0710524104 · DOI

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Perry, G. H., Yang, F., Marques-Bonet, T., Murphy, C., Fitzgerald, T., Lee, A. S., Hyland, C., Stone, A. C., Hurles, M. E., Tyler-Smith, C., Eichler, E. E., Carter, N. P., Lee, C., & Redon, R.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2008-09-04
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
1698-1710
ISSN
1088-9051
Cited by
202
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review