The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distinct DNA methylation patterns characterize differentiated human embryonic stem cells and developing human fetal liver
Open accessAbstract
To investigate the role of DNA methylation during human development, we developed Methyl-seq, a method that assays DNA methylation at more than 90,000 regions throughout the genome. Performing Methyl-seq on human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), their derivatives, and human tissues allowed us to identify several trends during hESC and in vivo liver differentiation. First, differentiation results in DNA methylation changes at a minimal number of assayed regions, both in vitro and in vivo (2%–11%). Second, in vitro hESC differentiation is characterized by both de novo methylation and demethylation, whereas in vivo fetal liver development is characterized predominantly by demethylation. Third, hESC differentiation is uniquely characterized by methylation changes specifically at H3K27me3-occupied regions, bivalent domains, and low density CpG promoters (LCPs), suggesting that these regions are more likely to be involved in transcriptional regulation during hESC differentiation. Although both H3K27me3-occupied domains and LCPs are also regions of high variability in DNA methylation state during human liver development, these regions become highly unmethylated, which is a distinct trend from that observed in hESCs. Taken together, our results indicate that hESC differentiation has a unique DNA methylation signature that may not be indicative of in vivo differentiation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory
Bird, A. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.947102 · Cited by 7,124
Jaenisch, R., & Bird, A. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1089 · Cited by 6,325
A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells
Bernstein, B. E., Mikkelsen, T. S., Xie, X., Kamal, M., Huebert, D. J., Cuff, J., Fry, B., Meissner, A., Wernig, M., Plath, K., et al. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.041 · Cited by 5,361
Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells
Mikkelsen, T. S., Ku, M., Jaffe, D. B., Issac, B., Lieberman, E., Giannoukos, G., Alvarez, P., Brockman, W., Kim, T.-K., Koche, R. P., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06008 · Cited by 4,129
Epigenetic Reprogramming in Mammalian Development
Reik, W., Dean, W., & Walter, J. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063443 · Cited by 3,078
DNA methylation landscapes: Provocative insights from epigenomics
Suzuki, M. M., & Bird, A. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2341 · Cited by 3,039
Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells
Meissner, A., Mikkelsen, T. S., Gu, H., Wernig, M., Hanna, J., Sivachenko, A., Zhang, X., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Jaffe, D. B., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07107 · Cited by 2,536
Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development
Reik, W. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05918 · Cited by 1,963 · cited 2×
“Because of numerous studies showing it associated with heterochromatin, DNA methylation has gained a reputation as a permanent, silencing mark (Bird and Wolffe 1999; Esteller 2008; Fuks et al. 2003; Hashimshony et al. 2003; Jaenisch 1997; Reik 2007; Siegfried et al. 1999; Tiwari et al. 2008; Walsh et al. 1998; Zhang e…”
BackgroundTranscription of IAP endogenous retroviruses is constrained by cytosine methylation
Walsh, C. P., Chaillet, J. R., & Bestor, T. H. (1998) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/2413 · Cited by 1,105
Whole-Genome Analysis of Histone H3 Lysine 4 and Lysine 27 Methylation in Human Embryonic Stem Cells
Pan, G., Tian, S., Nie, J., Yang, C., Ruotti, V., Wei, H., Jonsdottir, G. A., Stewart, R., & Thomson, J. A. (2007) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.003 · Cited by 711
DNA methylation represses transcription in vivo
Siegfried, Z., Eden, S., Mendelsohn, M., Feng, X., Tsuberi, B.-Z., & Cedar, H. (1999) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/9727 · Cited by 354
Cited by
Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences
Lister, R., Pelizzola, M., Dowen, R. H., Hawkins, R. D., Hon, G., Tonti-Filippini, J., Nery, J. R., Lee, L., Ye, Z., Ngo, Q.-M., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08514 · Cited by 4,673
Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies
Goodwin, S., McPherson, J. D., & McCombie, W. R. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.49 · Cited by 4,352
The Polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life
Margueron, R., & Reinberg, D. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09784 · Cited by 3,347
Repetitive DNA and next-generation sequencing: computational challenges and solutions
Treangen, T. J., & Salzberg, S. L. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3117 · Cited by 1,597
Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells
Hawkins, R. D., Hon, G. C., Lee, L. K., Ngo, Q., Lister, R., Pelizzola, M., Edsall, L. E., Kuan, S., Luu, Y., Klugman, S., et al. (2010) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.03.018 · Cited by 806
Metadata
- Authors
- Brunner, A. L., Johnson, D. S., Kim, S. W., Valouev, A., Reddy, T. E., Neff, N. F., Anton, E., Medina, C., Nguyen, L., Chiao, E., Oyolu, C. B., Schroth, G. P., Absher, D. M., Baker, J. C., & Myers, R. M.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2009-03-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1044-1056
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164813466
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 12
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
