Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 448

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DNA polymerase fidelity and the polymerase chain reaction.

Open access
Eckert, K A, Kunkel, T A·1991·Genome Research

Abstract

High-fidelity DNA synthesis conditions are those that exploit the inherent ability of polymerases to discriminate against errors. This review has described several experimental approaches for controlling the fidelity of enzymatic DNA amplification. One of the most important parameters to consider is the choice of which polymerase to use in PCR. As demonstrated by the data in Tables 2 and 3, high-fidelity DNA amplification will be best achieved by using a polymerase with an active 3'-->5' proofreading exonuclease activity (Fig. 1E). For those enzymes that are proofreading-deficient, the in vitro reaction conditions can significantly influence the polymerase error rates. To maximize fidelity at the dNTP insertion step (Fig. 1A,B), any type of deoxynucleoside triphosphate pool imbalance should be avoided. Similarly, stabilization of errors by polymerase extension from mispaired or misaligned primer-termini (Fig. 1D) can be minimized by reactions using short synthesis times, low dNTP concentrations, and low enzyme concentrations. Additional improvements in fidelity can be made by further manipulating the reaction conditions. To perform high-fidelity PCR with Taq polymerase, reactions should contain a low MgCl2 concentration, not in large excess over the total concentration of dNTP substrates, and be buffered to approximately pH 6 (70 degrees C) using Bis-Tris Propane or PIPES (Table 2). These buffers have a pKa between pH 6 and pH 7 and a small temperature coefficient (delta pKa/degree C), allowing the pH to be maintained stably throughout the PCR cycle. For amplifications in which fidelity is the critical issue, one should avoid the concept that conditions generating more DNA product are the better conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.1.1.17

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 448

Metadata

Authors
Eckert, K. A., & Kunkel, T. A.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
1991-08
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
17-24
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122139577
Cited by
448
References
49
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA polymerase fidelity and the polymerase chain reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.1.1.17
The paper
Eckert, K. A., & Kunkel, T. A. (1991). DNA polymerase fidelity and the polymerase chain reaction. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1.1.17

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.