The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA polymerase fidelity and the polymerase chain reaction.
Open accessAbstract
High-fidelity DNA synthesis conditions are those that exploit the inherent ability of polymerases to discriminate against errors. This review has described several experimental approaches for controlling the fidelity of enzymatic DNA amplification. One of the most important parameters to consider is the choice of which polymerase to use in PCR. As demonstrated by the data in Tables 2 and 3, high-fidelity DNA amplification will be best achieved by using a polymerase with an active 3'-->5' proofreading exonuclease activity (Fig. 1E). For those enzymes that are proofreading-deficient, the in vitro reaction conditions can significantly influence the polymerase error rates. To maximize fidelity at the dNTP insertion step (Fig. 1A,B), any type of deoxynucleoside triphosphate pool imbalance should be avoided. Similarly, stabilization of errors by polymerase extension from mispaired or misaligned primer-termini (Fig. 1D) can be minimized by reactions using short synthesis times, low dNTP concentrations, and low enzyme concentrations. Additional improvements in fidelity can be made by further manipulating the reaction conditions. To perform high-fidelity PCR with Taq polymerase, reactions should contain a low MgCl2 concentration, not in large excess over the total concentration of dNTP substrates, and be buffered to approximately pH 6 (70 degrees C) using Bis-Tris Propane or PIPES (Table 2). These buffers have a pKa between pH 6 and pH 7 and a small temperature coefficient (delta pKa/degree C), allowing the pH to be maintained stably throughout the PCR cycle. For amplifications in which fidelity is the critical issue, one should avoid the concept that conditions generating more DNA product are the better conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase
Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., & Erlich, H. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2448875 · Cited by 17,719
Frohman, M. A., Dush, M. K., & Martin, G. R. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.23.8998 · Cited by 4,577
Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance
Luria, S. E., & Delbrück, M. (1943) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/28.6.491 · Cited by 3,894
Analysis of any point mutation in DNA. The amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)
Newton, C. R., Graham, A., Heptinstall, L. E., Powell, S. J., Summers, C., Kalsheker, N., Smith, J. C., & Markham, A. F. (1989) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/17.7.2503 · Cited by 2,475
Frameshift Mutations and the Genetic Code
Streisinger, G., Okada, Y., Emrich, J., Newton, J., Tsugita, A., Terzaghi, E., & Inouye, M. (1966) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.014 · Cited by 1,400
Kwok, S., Kellogg, D. E., McKinney, N., Spasic, D., Goda, L., Levenson, C., & Sninsky, J. J. (1990) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/18.4.999 · Cited by 1,036
The accuracy of reverse transcriptase from HIV-1
Roberts, J. D., Bebenek, K., & Kunkel, T. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2460925 · Cited by 997
Self-citationFidelity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase
Preston, B. D., Poiesz, B. J., & Loeb, L. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2460924 · Cited by 931
MUTAGENESIS BY APURINIC/APYRIMIDINIC SITES
Loeb, L. A., & Preston, B. D. (1986) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.20.120186.001221 · Cited by 901
Fidelity of DNA synthesis by the Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase
Tindall, K. R., & Kunkel, T. A. (1988) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00416a027 · Cited by 805
Self-citation
Cited by
Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification
Dean, F. B., Hosono, S., Fang, L., Wu, X., Faruqi, A. F., Bray-Ward, P., Sun, Z., Zong, Q., Du, Y., Du, J., et al. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.082089499 · Cited by 1,467
Stadhouders, R., Pas, S. D., Anber, J., Voermans, J., Mes, T. H. M., & Schutten, M. (2010) · The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090035 · Cited by 399
Pre-existing Anti–Adeno-Associated Virus Antibodies as a Challenge in AAV Gene Therapy
Louis Jeune, V., Joergensen, J. A., Hajjar, R. J., & Weber, T. (2013) · Human Gene Therapy Methods · doi:10.1089/hgtb.2012.243 · Cited by 358
Sources of PCR-induced distortions in high-throughput sequencing data sets
Kebschull, J. M., & Zador, A. M. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv717 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Eckert, K. A., & Kunkel, T. A.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1991-08
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-24
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122139577
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 49
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA polymerase fidelity and the polymerase chain reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.1.1.17
- The paper
- Eckert, K. A., & Kunkel, T. A. (1991). DNA polymerase fidelity and the polymerase chain reaction. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1.1.17
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.