Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Discovery of non-ETS gene fusions in human prostate cancer using next-generation RNA sequencing

Open access
Pflueger, Dorothee, Terry, Stéphane, Sboner, Andrea, Habegger, Lukas, Esgueva, Raquel, Lin, Pei-Chun, Svensson, Maria A., Kitabayashi, Naoki, Moss, Benjamin J., MacDonald, Theresa Y., Cao, Xuhong, Barrette, Terrence, Tewari, Ashutosh K., Chee, Mark S., Chinnaiyan, Arul M., Rickman, David S., Demichelis, Francesca, Gerstein, Mark B., Rubin, Mark A.·2011·Genome Research

Abstract

Half of prostate cancers harbor gene fusions between TMPRSS2 and members of the ETS transcription factor family. To date, little is known about the presence of non-ETS fusion events in prostate cancer. We used next-generation transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) in order to explore the whole transcriptome of 25 human prostate cancer samples for the presence of chimeric fusion transcripts. We generated more than 1 billion sequence reads and used a novel computational approach (FusionSeq) in order to identify novel gene fusion candidates with high confidence. In total, we discovered and characterized seven new cancer-specific gene fusions, two involving the ETS genes ETV1 and ERG, and four involving non-ETS genes such as CDKN1A(p21),CD9, and IKBKB(IKK-beta), genes known to exhibit key biological roles in cellular homeostasis or assumed to be critical in tumorigenesis of other tumor entities, as well as the oncogene PIGU and the tumor suppressor gene RSRC2. The novel gene fusions are found to be of low frequency, but, interestingly, the non-ETS fusions were all present in prostate cancer harboring the TMPRSS2–ERG gene fusion. Future work will focus on determining if the ETS rearrangements in prostate cancer are associated or directly predispose to a rearrangement-prone phenotype.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.110684.110

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Pflueger, D., Terry, S., Sboner, A., Habegger, L., Esgueva, R., Lin, P.-C., Svensson, M. A., Kitabayashi, N., Moss, B. J., MacDonald, T. Y., Cao, X., Barrette, T., Tewari, A. K., Chee, M. S., Chinnaiyan, A. M., Rickman, D. S., Demichelis, F., Gerstein, M. B., & Rubin, M. A.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2010-10-29
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
56-67
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136810701
Cited by
201
References
7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discovery of non-ETS gene fusions in human prostate cancer using next-generation RNA sequencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.110684.110
The paper
Pflueger, D., Terry, S., Sboner, A., Habegger, L., Esgueva, R., Lin, P.-C., Svensson, M. A., Kitabayashi, N., Moss, B. J., MacDonald, T. Y., Cao, X., Barrette, T., Tewari, A. K., Chee, M. S., Chinnaiyan, A. M., Rickman, D. S., Demichelis, F., Gerstein, M. B., & Rubin, M. A. (2011). Discovery of non-ETS gene fusions in human prostate cancer using next-generation RNA sequencing. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.110684.110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.