The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic analysis in the Collaborative Cross breeding population
Open accessAbstract
Genetic reference populations in model organisms are critical resources for systems genetic analysis of disease related phenotypes. The breeding history of these inbred panels may influence detectable allelic and phenotypic diversity. The existing panel of common inbred strains reflects historical selection biases, and existing recombinant inbred panels have low allelic diversity. All such populations may be subject to consequences of inbreeding depression. The Collaborative Cross (CC) is a mouse reference population with high allelic diversity that is being constructed using a randomized breeding design that systematically outcrosses eight founder strains, followed by inbreeding to obtain new recombinant inbred strains. Five of the eight founders are common laboratory strains, and three are wild-derived. Since its inception, the partially inbred CC has been characterized for physiological, morphological, and behavioral traits. The construction of this population provided a unique opportunity to observe phenotypic variation as new allelic combinations arose through intercrossing and inbreeding to create new stable genetic combinations. Processes including inbreeding depression and its impact on allelic and phenotypic diversity were assessed. Phenotypic variation in the CC breeding population exceeds that of existing mouse genetic reference populations due to both high founder genetic diversity and novel epistatic combinations. However, some focal evidence of allele purging was detected including a suggestive QTL for litter size in a location of changing allele frequency. Despite these inescapable pressures, high diversity and precision for genetic mapping remain. These results demonstrate the potential of the CC population once completed and highlight implications for development of related populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the phenomenon of transgressive segregation in mapping populations of mice and flies established from eight founder strains provides strong empirical support for the existence of common polygenes94–96.”
From Rare and common variants: twenty arguments (2012) · cites this paper as [95]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits
(2002) · Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0388.2002.00356.x · Cited by 6,176
The Genetic Architecture of Maize Flowering Time
Buckler, E. S., Holland, J. B., Bradbury, P. J., Acharya, C. B., Brown, P. J., Browne, C., Ersoz, E. S., Flint-Garcia, S. A., Garcia, A. R., Glaubitz, J. C., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1174276 · Cited by 1,462
Kover, P. X., Valdar, W. S. J., Trakalo, J., Scarcelli, N., Ehrenreich, I. M., Purugganan, M. D., Durrant, C., & Mott, R. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000551 · Cited by 635
Sleep as a fundamental property of neuronal assemblies
Krueger, J. M., Rector, D. M., Roy, S., Van Dongen, H. P. A., Belenky, G., & Panksepp, J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2521 · Cited by 596
Systems genetics of complex traits in Drosophila melanogaster
Ayroles, J. F., Carbone, M. A., Stone, E. A., Jordan, K. W., Lyman, R. F., Magwire, M. M., Rollmann, S. M., Duncan, L. H., Lawrence, F., Anholt, R. R. H., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.332 · Cited by 499
A new set of BXD recombinant inbred lines from advanced intercross populations in mice
Peirce, J. L., Lu, L., Gu, J., Silver, L. M., & Williams, R. W. (2004) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/1471-2156-5-7 · Cited by 484
A method for fine mapping quantitative trait loci in outbred animal stocks
Mott, R., Talbot, C. J., Turri, M. G., Collins, A. C., & Jonathan Flint, C. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.230304397 · Cited by 441
Recombinational Landscape and Population Genomics of Caenorhabditis elegans
Rockman, M. V., & Kruglyak, L. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000419 · Cited by 402
Mathematical models of sleep regulation
Achermann, P. (2003) · Frontiers in Bioscience · doi:10.2741/1064 · Cited by 358
A high-resolution association mapping panel for the dissection of complex traits in micePreprint
Bennett, B. J., Farber, C. R., Orozco, L. D., Kang, H. M., Ghazalpour, A., Siemers, N. O., Neubauer, M., Neuhaus, I., Yordanova, R., Guan, B., et al. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.099234.109 · Cited by 319
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rare and common variants: twenty arguments
Gibson, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3118 · Cited by 1,278
Systems genetics approaches to understand complex traits
Civelek, M., & Lusis, A. J. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3575 · Cited by 621
The Genome Architecture of the Collaborative Cross Mouse Genetic Reference Population
Collaborative Cross Consortium (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.111.132639 · Cited by 480
Host genetic and environmental effects on mouse intestinal microbiota
Campbell, J. H., Foster, C. M., Vishnivetskaya, T. A., Campbell, A. G., Yang, Z. K., Wymore, A. M., Palumbo, A. V., Chesler, E. J., & Podar, M. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.54 · Cited by 220
Self-citationGenetic dissection of a model complex trait using the Drosophila Synthetic Population ResourcePreprint
King, E. G., Merkes, C. M., McNeil, C. L., Hoofer, S. R., Sen, Ś., Broman, K. W., Long, A. D., & Macdonald, S. J. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.134031.111 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Philip, V. M., Sokoloff, G., Ackert-Bicknell, C. L., Striz, M., Branstetter, L., Beckmann, M. A., Spence, J. S., Jackson, B. L., Galloway, L. D., Barker, P., Wymore, A. M., Hunsicker, P. R., Durtschi, D. C., Shaw, G. S., Shinpock, S., Manly, K. F., Miller, D. R., Donohue, K. D., Culiat, C. T., Churchill, G. A., Lariviere, W. R., Palmer, A. A., O'Hara, B. F., Voy, B. H., & Chesler, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
- Jackson Laboratory (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2011-07-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1223-1238
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3149490
- OpenAlex
- W2168433590
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 36
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Genome Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Ellison Medical Foundation (AG025707)
- Taiho Kogyo Tribology Research Foundation
- Office of Science
- U.S. Public Health Service (FA9550-05-1-0464)
- Health Science Center, University of Tennessee
- National Institute on Aging (P30AG025707, AG025707)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH079103, MH079103)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA021198, R01DA021198)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P50GM076468, R01GM070683, R01GM097737)
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- Collaborative Cross, inbreeding depression, allelic diversity, phenotypic diversity, epistasis, litter size, quantitative trait loci, recombinant inbred lines, gene mapping, systems genetics
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Crosses, Genetic, Female, Genotype, Inbreeding, Litter Size, Male, Mice, Inbred Strains, Phenotype, Genetic Variation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
