The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors
Open accessAbstract
Chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) has become the dominant technique for mapping transcription factor (TF) binding regions genome-wide. We performed an integrative analysis centered around 457 ChIP-seq data sets on 119 human TFs generated by the ENCODE Consortium. We identified highly enriched sequence motifs in most data sets, revealing new motifs and validating known ones. The motif sites (TF binding sites) are highly conserved evolutionarily and show distinct footprints upon DNase I digestion. We frequently detected secondary motifs in addition to the canonical motifs of the TFs, indicating tethered binding and cobinding between multiple TFs. We observed significant position and orientation preferences between many cobinding TFs. Genes specifically expressed in a cell line are often associated with a greater occurrence of nearby TF binding in that cell line. We observed cell-line–specific secondary motifs that mediate the binding of the histone deacetylase HDAC2 and the enhancer-binding protein EP300. TF binding sites are located in GC-rich, nucleosome-depleted, and DNase I sensitive regions, flanked by well-positioned nucleosomes, and many of these features show cell type specificity. The GC-richness may be beneficial for regulating TF binding because, when unoccupied by a TF, these regions are occupied by nucleosomes in vivo. We present the results of our analysis in a TF-centric web repository Factorbook (http://factorbook.org) and will continually update this repository as more ENCODE data are generated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Landscape of transcription in human cells
Djebali, S., Davis, C. A., Merkel, A., Dobin, A., Lassmann, T., Mortazavi, A., Tanzer, A., Lagarde, J., Lin, W., Schlesinger, F., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11233 · Cited by 5,187
BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets
Stark, C. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj109 · Cited by 3,960
The complex language of chromatin regulation during transcription
Berger, S. L. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05915 · Cited by 2,768
Weintraub, H., & Groudine, M. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.948749 · Cited by 1,809
Robertson, G., Hirst, M., Bainbridge, M., Bilenky, M., Zhao, Y., Zeng, T., Euskirchen, G., Bernier, B., Varhol, R., Delaney, A., et al. (2007) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth1068 · Cited by 1,454
Self-citationTranscription regulation and animal diversity
Levine, M., & Tjian, R. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01763 · Cited by 1,309
Transcriptional Regulatory Elements in the Human Genome
Maston, G. A., Evans, S. K., & Green, M. R. (2006) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.7.080505.115623 · Cited by 937 · cited 5×
“…and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, USA; 2Bioinformatics Program, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA; 3Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA; 4Department of…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAn atlas of combinatorial transcriptional regulation in mouse and man
Ravasi, T., Suzuki, H., Cannistraci, C. V., Katayama, S., Bajic, V. B., Tan, K., Akalin, A., Schmeier, S., Kanamori-Katayama, M., Bertin, N., et al. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.044 · Cited by 715
CTCF is a uniquely versatile transcription regulator linked to epigenetics and disease
Ohlsson, R., Renkawitz, R., & Lobanenkov, V. (2001) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02366-6 · Cited by 591
Animal Transcription Networks as Highly Connected, Quantitative Continua
Biggin, M. D. (2011) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.09.008 · Cited by 308
Ubiquitous heterogeneity and asymmetry of the chromatin environment at regulatory elements
Kundaje, A., Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou, S., Libbrecht, M., Smith, C. L., Raha, D., Winters, E. E., Johnson, S. M., Snyder, M., Batzoglou, S., & Sidow, A. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.136366.111 · Cited by 178
Self-citationMyslinski, E., Gérard, M.-A., Krol, A., & Carbon, P. (2006) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m608507200 · Cited by 60
Cited by
Landscape of transcription in human cells
Djebali, S., Davis, C. A., Merkel, A., Dobin, A., Lassmann, T., Mortazavi, A., Tanzer, A., Lagarde, J., Lin, W., Schlesinger, F., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11233 · Cited by 5,187
Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning
Alipanahi, B., Delong, A., Weirauch, M. T., & Frey, B. J. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3300 · Cited by 2,873
Expanded encyclopaedias of DNA elements in the human and mouse genomes
The ENCODE Project Consortium, Abascal, F., Acosta, R., Addleman, N. J., Adrian, J., Afzal, V., Ai, R., Aken, B., Akiyama, J. A., Jammal, O. A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2493-4 · Cited by 2,378
Self-citationZiegler, C. G. K., Allon, S. J., Nyquist, S. K., Mbano, I. M., Miao, V. N., Tzouanas, C. N., Cao, Y., Yousif, A. S., Bals, J., Hauser, B. M., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.035 · Cited by 2,284
Self-citationExercise induces hippocampal BDNF through a PGC-1α/FNDC5 pathway
Wrann, C. D., White, J. P., Salogiannnis, J., Laznik-Bogoslavski, D., Wu, J., Ma, D., Lin, J. D., Greenberg, M. E., & Spiegelman, B. M. (2013) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2013.09.008 · Cited by 1,440
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J., Zhuang, J., Iyer, S., Lin, X., Whitfield, T. W., Greven, M. C., Pierce, B. G., Dong, X., Kundaje, A., Cheng, Y., Rando, O. J., Birney, E., Myers, R. M., Noble, W. S., Snyder, M., & Weng, Z.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1798-1812
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118608526
- Cited by
- 818
- References
- 12
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
