Cited by 1,454Genomics and Chromatin Dynamicsinterferon and immune responsesCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions

Genome-wide profiles of STAT1 DNA association using chromatin immunoprecipitation and massively parallel sequencing

Robertson, Gordon, Hirst, Martin, Bainbridge, Matthew, Bilenky, Misha, Zhao, Yongjun, Zeng, Thomas, Euskirchen, Ghia, Bernier, Bridget +8 more·2007·Nature Methods

Abstract

We developed a method, ChIP-sequencing (ChIP-seq), combining chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and massively parallel sequencing to identify mammalian DNA sequences bound by transcription factors in vivo. We used ChIP-seq to map STAT1 targets in interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma)-stimulated and unstimulated human HeLa S3 cells, and compared the method's performance to ChIP-PCR and to ChIP-chip for four chromosomes. By ChIP-seq, using 15.1 and 12.9 million uniquely mapped sequence reads, and an estimated false discovery rate of less than 0.001, we identified 41,582 and 11,004 putative STAT1-binding regions in stimulated and unstimulated cells, respectively. Of the 34 loci known to contain STAT1 interferon-responsive binding sites, ChIP-seq found 24 (71%). ChIP-seq targets were enriched in sequences similar to known STAT1 binding motifs. Comparisons with two ChIP-PCR data sets suggested that ChIP-seq sensitivity was between 70% and 92% and specificity was at least 95%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth1068

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robertson, G., Hirst, M., Bainbridge, M., Bilenky, M., Zhao, Y., Zeng, T., Euskirchen, G., Bernier, B., Varhol, R., Delaney, A., Thiessen, N., Griffith, O. L., He, A., Marra, M., Snyder, M., & Jones, S.
Affiliations
  • BC Cancer Agency (CA)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Jones, Steven
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2007-06-11
Volume
4
Issue
8
Pages
651-657
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2059699217
Cited by
1,454
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 124
FWCI
52.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre
  • Genome British Columbia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Keywords
ChIP-seq, STAT1, transcription factor binding sites, interferon-gamma signaling, HeLa S3 cells, genome-wide binding site mapping, false discovery rate, method sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
DNA, Protein Binding, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Genome, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, STAT1 Transcription Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review