Cited by 298Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Genomic regions exhibiting positive selection identified from dense genotype data

Open access
Carlson, Christopher S., Thomas, Daryl J., Eberle, Michael A., Swanson, Johanna E., Livingston, Robert J., Rieder, Mark J., Nickerson, Deborah A.·2005·Genome Research

Abstract

The allele frequency spectrum of polymorphisms in DNA sequences can be used to test for signatures of natural selection that depart from the expected frequency spectrum under the neutral theory. We observed a significant ( P = 0.001) correlation between the Tajima's D test statistic in full resequencing data and Tajima's D in a dense, genome-wide data set of genotyped polymorphisms for a set of 179 genes. Based on this, we used a sliding window analysis of Tajima's D across the human genome to identify regions putatively subject to strong, recent, selective sweeps. This survey identified seven Contiguous Regions of Tajima's D Reduction (CRTRs) in an African-descent population (AD), 23 in a European-descent population (ED), and 29 in a Chinese-descent population (XD). Only four CRTRs overlapped between populations: three between ED and XD and one between AD and ED. Full resequencing of eight genes within six CRTRs demonstrated frequency spectra inconsistent with neutral expectations for at least one gene within each CRTR. Identification of the functional polymorphism (and/or haplotype) responsible for the selective sweeps within each CRTR may provide interesting insights into the strongest selective pressures experienced by the human genome over recent evolutionary history.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.4326505

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SLC30A9 encodes ZnT9, a ubiquitously expressed zinc transporter, and has been repeatedly reported as a top candidate region for positive selection in humans, mostly in East Asian populations.

    “The SLC30A9 gene (chr4: 41,990,502–42,090,461; GRCh38) has been repeatedly reported as a top candidate region for positive selection in several genome-wide scans of selection, mostly in East Asian populations [14,16–20].”

    From Human genetic adaptation related to cellular zinc homeostasis (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results and Screening for positive selection sections describe candidate regions in several populations, including a Chinese-descent population, but the retrieved passages do not identify SLC30A9 as one of them. Searches for SLC30A9, ZnT9, and the stated chromosome 4 location found no passage linking this gene to positive selection; this copy therefore does not establish the claim for this citation. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies detected strong signatures of positive selection in the SLC30A9 region.

    “The motivation for this study was the previous detection of strong signatures of positive selection in the SLC30A9 region [13,14,16,17,20,25].”

    From Human genetic adaptation related to cellular zinc homeostasis (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results and Screening for positive selection sections report candidate regions with signatures of selection, but the passages found do not identify SLC30A9 or link its region to one of those signals. Searches for SLC30A9 and zinc-transporter terminology found no passage addressing the specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlson, C. S., Thomas, D. J., Eberle, M. A., Swanson, J. E., Livingston, R. J., Rieder, M. J., & Nickerson, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2005-10-26
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
1553-1565
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037710951
Cited by
298
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 66682, HL66642, U01HL066682, U01HL066642)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (IP41HG02371, HG 02238, P41HG002371, R01HG002238)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
positive selection, selective sweeps, Tajima's D, allele frequency spectrum, human genome, genetic differentiation, African descent populations, resequencing, functional polymorphisms
MeSH terms
Asian, Base Sequence, Black or African American, Gene Frequency, Genes, Genotype, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Polymorphism, Genetic, Selection, Genetic, Genome, Human, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Primers, Evolution, Molecular, Genomics, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review