The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes
Open accessAbstract
Several contrasting scenarios have been proposed for the origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns, a hallmark of eukaryotic genes. A comprehensive probabilistic model to obtain a definitive reconstruction of intron evolution was developed and applied to 391 sets of conserved genes from 19 eukaryotic species. It is inferred that a relatively high intron density was reached early, i.e., the last common ancestor of eukaryotes contained >2.15 introns/kilobase, and the last common ancestor of multicellular life forms harbored ∼3.4 introns/kilobase, a greater intron density than in most of the extant fungi and in some animals. The rates of intron gain and intron loss appear to have been dropping during the last ∼1.3 billion years, with the decline in the gain rate being much steeper. Eukaryotic lineages exhibit three distinct modes of evolution of the intron–exon structure. The primary, balanced mode, apparently, operates in all lineages. In this mode, intron gain and loss are strongly and positively correlated, in contrast to previous reports on inverse correlation between these processes. The second mode involves an elevated rate of intron loss and is prevalent in several lineages, such as fungi and insects. The third mode, characterized by elevated rate of intron gain, is seen only in deep branches of the tree, indicating that bursts of intron invasion occurred at key points in eukaryotic evolution, such as the origin of animals. Intron dynamics could depend on multiple mechanisms, and in the balanced mode, gain and loss of introns might share common mechanistic features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yang, Z. (1994) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00160154 · Cited by 2,960
Gilbert, W. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/271501a0 · Cited by 2,300
The origins of genome complexity
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089370 · Cited by 1,698
Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals
Aguinaldo, A. M. A., Turbeville, J. M., Linford, L. S., Rivera, M. C., Garey, J. R., Raff, R. A., & Lake, J. A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387489a0 · Cited by 1,609
The origin and evolution of model organisms
Hedges, S. B. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg929 · Cited by 806
Rogozin, I. B., Wolf, Y. I., Sorokin, A. V., Mirkin, B. G., & Koonin, E. V. (2003) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00558-x · Cited by 445
Self-citationIntron—exon structures of eukaryotic model organisms
Long, M., & Deutsch, M. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.15.3219 · Cited by 417
Vertebrate-Type Intron-Rich Genes in the Marine Annelid Platynereis dumerilii
Raible, F., Tessmar-Raible, K., Osoegawa, K., Wincker, P., Jubin, C., Balavoine, G., Ferrier, D., Benes, V., de Jong, P., Weissenbach, J., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1119089 · Cited by 257
Complex Spliceosomal Organization Ancestral to Extant Eukaryotes
Collins, L., & Penny, D. (2005) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msi091 · Cited by 240
Cited by
Alternative splicing and evolution: diversification, exon definition and function
Keren, H., Lev-Maor, G., & Ast, G. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2776 · Cited by 1,082
The origin and early evolution of eukaryotes in the light of phylogenomics
Koonin, E. V. (2010) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-209 · Cited by 345
Self-citationGenome reduction as the dominant mode of evolution
Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2013) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201300037 · Cited by 314
Self-citationLoh, Y.-H., Brenner, S., & Venkatesh, B. (2008) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm278 · Cited by 53
Near intron pairs and the metazoan tree
Lehmann, J., Stadler, P. F., & Krauss, V. (2013) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.11.012 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Carmel, L., Wolf, Y. I., Rogozin, I. B., & Koonin, E. V.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2007-05-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1034-1044
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129147686
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 9
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.6438607
- The paper
- Carmel, L., Wolf, Y. I., Rogozin, I. B., & Koonin, E. V. (2007). Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.6438607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.