The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes
Open accessAbstract
Numerous eukaryotic proteins contain multiple domains. Certain domains show a tendency to occur in diverse domain architectures and can be considered “promiscuous.” These promiscuous domains are, typically, involved in protein–protein interactions and play crucial roles in interaction networks, particularly those that contribute to signal transduction. A systematic comparative-genomic analysis of promiscuous domains in eukaryotes is described. Two quantitative measures of domain promiscuity are introduced and applied to the analysis of 28 genomes of diverse eukaryotes. Altogether, 215 domains are identified as strongly promiscuous. The fraction of promiscuous domains in animals is shown to be significantly greater than that in fungi or plants. Evolutionary reconstructions indicate that domain promiscuity is a volatile, relatively fast-changing feature of eukaryotic proteins, with few domains remaining promiscuous throughout the evolution of eukaryotes. Some domains appear to have attained promiscuity independently in different lineages, for example, animals and plants. It is proposed that promiscuous domains persist within a relatively small pool of evolutionarily stable domain combinations from which numerous rare architectures emerge during evolution. Domain promiscuity positively correlates with the number of experimentally detected domain interactions and with the strength of purifying selection affecting a domain. Thus, evolution of promiscuous domains seems to be constrained by the diversity of their interaction partners. The set of promiscuous domains is enriched for domains mediating protein–protein interactions that are involved in various forms of signal transduction, especially in the ubiquitin system and in chromatin. Thus, a limited repertoire of promiscuous domains makes a major contribution to the diversity and evolvability of eukaryotic proteomes and signaling networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Detecting Protein Function and Protein-Protein Interactions from Genome Sequences
Marcotte, E. M., Pellegrini, M., Ng, H.-L., Rice, D. W., Yeates, T. O., & Eisenberg, D. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5428.751 · Cited by 1,670
The genome of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum
Eichinger, L., Pachebat, J. A., Glöckner, G., Rajandream, M.-A., Sucgang, R., Berriman, M., Song, J., Olsen, R., Szafranski, K., Xu, Q., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03481 · Cited by 1,351
CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for protein classification
Marchler-Bauer, A. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki069 · Cited by 1,156
The origin and evolution of model organisms
Hedges, S. B. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg929 · Cited by 806
Distribution of Protein Folds in the Three Superkingdoms of Life
Wolf, Y. I., Brenner, S. E., Bash, P. A., & Koonin, E. V. (1999) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.9.1.17 · Cited by 183
Self-citationModular Assembly of Genes and the Evolution of New Functions
Patthy, L. (2003) · Genetica · doi:10.1023/a:1024182432483 · Cited by 166
Cited by
Quantifying the mechanisms of domain gain in animal proteins
Buljan, M., Frankish, A., & Bateman, A. (2010) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-7-r74 · Cited by 112
Nagy, A., Szláma, G., Szarka, E., Trexler, M., Bányai, L., & Patthy, L. (2011) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes2030449 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Basu, M. K., Carmel, L., Rogozin, I. B., & Koonin, E. V.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2008-01-29
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 449-461
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161211166
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 6
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.6943508
- The paper
- Basu, M. K., Carmel, L., Rogozin, I. B., & Koonin, E. V. (2008). Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.6943508
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.