Cited by 37Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Serotonin transporter knockout rats show improved strategy set-shifting and reduced latent inhibition

Open access
Nonkes, Lourens J.P., van de Vondervoort, Ilse I.G.M., de Leeuw, Mark J.C., Wijlaars, Linda P., Maes, Joseph H.R., Homberg, Judith R.·2012·Learning & Memory

Abstract

Behavioral flexibility is a cognitive process depending on prefrontal areas allowing adaptive responses to environmental changes. Serotonin transporter knockout (5-HTT−/−) rodents show improved reversal learning in addition to orbitofrontal cortex changes. Another form of behavioral flexibility, extradimensional strategy set-shifting (EDSS), heavily depends on the medial prefrontal cortex. This region shows functional changes in 5-HTT−/− rodents as well. Here we subjected 5-HTT−/− rats and their wild-type counterparts to an EDSS paradigm and a supplementary latent inhibition task. Results indicate that 5-HTT−/− rats also show improved EDSS, and indicate that reduced latent inhibition may contribute as an underlying mechanism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.025908.112

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nonkes, L. J. P., van de Vondervoort, I. I. G. M., de Leeuw, M. J. C., Wijlaars, L. P., Maes, J. H. R., & Homberg, J. R.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2012-04-13
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
190-193
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2135825073
Cited by
37
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (86410003)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
serotonin transporter knockout, latent inhibition, behavioral flexibility, medial prefrontal cortex, reversal learning, orbitofrontal cortex, cognitive flexibility
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Inhibition, Psychological, Rats, Wistar, Prefrontal Cortex, Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins, Rats, Gene Knockout Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review