The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Memory for context becomes less specific with time
Open accessAbstract
Context memories initially require the hippocampus, but over time become independent of this structure. This shift reflects a consolidation process whereby memories are gradually stored in distributed regions of the cortex. The function of this process is thought to be the extraction of statistical regularities and general knowledge from specific experiences. The current study examined this idea in mice by measuring the specificity of context memories during consolidation. In the first experiment, separate groups of animals were trained with a single shock and tested in the training context or a novel environment 1, 14, 28, or 36 d later. We found a systematic increase in generalization over this period. Initially, mice froze more in the training context, but fear of the novel environment grew over time until animals eventually froze an equivalent amount in both contexts. The second experiment demonstrated that the increase in generalization was due to a loss of detailed information about the context and not fear incubation. In this experiment, mice were exposed to the context and then trained with an immediate shock 1 or 36 d later. Animals trained 1 d after exposure acquired robust context fear that did not generalize across environments. In contrast, mice trained 36 d after exposure froze an equivalent amount in the training context and the novel environment. The same profile was observed in H-ras mutants that exhibit enhanced hippocampal plasticity and learning. These results suggest that context memories are specific early after training when they require the hippocampus, and become more general as they are permanently stored in the cortex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.419 · Cited by 5,256
Tulving, E. (1985) · Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/h0080017 · Cited by 4,638
Squire, L. R., Stark, C. E. L., & Clark, R. E. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144130 · Cited by 2,680
Modality-Specific Retrograde Amnesia of Fear
Kim, J. J., & Fanselow, M. S. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1585183 · Cited by 2,483
The organization of recent and remote memories
Frankland, P. W., & Bontempi, B. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1607 · Cited by 2,138
Retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation: a neurobiological perspective
Squire, L. R., & Alvarez, P. (1995) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0959-4388(95)80023-9 · Cited by 1,416
The Involvement of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Remote Contextual Fear Memory
Frankland, P. W., Bontempi, B., Talton, L. E., Kaczmarek, L., & Silva, A. J. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1094804 · Cited by 945
Self-citationRemembering episodes: a selective role for the hippocampus during retrieval
Eldridge, L. L., Knowlton, B. J., Furmanski, C. S., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Engel, S. A. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/80671 · Cited by 909
Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: Principles of cortical and hippocampal function.
O'Reilly, R. C., & Rudy, J. W. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.108.2.311 · Cited by 865
Neurotoxic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus and Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats
Maren, S., Aharonov, G., & Fanselow, M. S. (1997) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(97)00088-0 · Cited by 771
Cited by
Memory engrams: Recalling the past and imagining the future
Josselyn, S. A., & Tonegawa, S. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw4325 · Cited by 1,087
Squire, L. R., Genzel, L., Wixted, J. T., & Morris, R. G. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a021766 · Cited by 700
Observational fear learning involves affective pain system and Cav1.2 Ca2+ channels in ACC
Jeon, D., Kim, S., Chetana, M., Jo, D., Ruley, H. E., Lin, S.-Y., Rabah, D., Kinet, J.-P., & Shin, H.-S. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2504 · Cited by 651
A Neural Circuit for Memory Specificity and Generalization
Xu, W., & Südhof, T. C. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1229534 · Cited by 634
Memory Transformation and Systems Consolidation
Winocur, G., & Moscovitch, M. (2011) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617711000683 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiltgen, B. J., & Silva, A. J.
- Venue
- Learning & Memory
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 313-317
- ISSN
- 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5485
- OpenAlex
- W2109257210
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 38
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Memory for context becomes less specific with time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/lm.430907
- The paper
- Wiltgen, B. J., & Silva, A. J. (2007). Memory for context becomes less specific with time. Learning & Memory. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.430907
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.