Cited by 634Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

A Neural Circuit for Memory Specificity and Generalization

Open access
Xu, Wei, Südhof, Thomas C.·2013·Science

Abstract

The Thalamus in Fear and Memory: The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) mediates the cognitive control of many high-level brain functions. However, it is unclear which synaptic projections from the mPFC to subcortical regions are critical for maintaining the proper balance between retention and generalization of fear memory details. Using an array of behavioral, physiological, and anatomical techniques, Xu and Südhof (p. 1290 ) describe a neural circuit that controls memory generalization and specificity. This circuit involves the nucleus reuniens (NR), a thalamic nucleus of largely unknown function. Optogenetic activation of NR neurons in awake behaving mice revealed the role of the NR in fear memory generalization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1229534

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reuniens nucleus of the thalamus coordinates oscillatory synchrony between the mPFC and the vHPC, which is necessary for proper contextual representation of threat memories.

    “The reuniens nucleus of the thalamus coordinates oscillatory synchrony between the mPFC and the vHPC, which is necessary for proper contextual representation of threat memories [46, 53].”

    From Prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and threat processing: implications for PTSD (2022) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Summary and ‘Activity patterns of N. reuniens neurons control memory specificity’ sections report that the mPFC–reuniens–hippocampus circuit regulates the specificity of contextual fear memories during acquisition. They do not establish that reuniens coordinates oscillatory synchrony between the mPFC and specifically the ventral hippocampus, or that such synchrony is necessary for contextual representation (searched: oscillatory synchrony, synchrony, ventral hippocampus). No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. [1]Mahan AL Ressler KJ Trends Neurosci 2012 1 35 24 21798604 PMC3206195
  2. [2]Gotlib IH Joormann J Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2010 6 285 20192795 PMC2845726
  3. [3]Watson JB Rayner R Am Psychol 2000 3 55 313 10743250
  4. [4]Frankland PW Cestari V Filipkowski RK McDonald RJ Silva AJ Behav Neurosci 1998 8 112 863 9733192
  5. [5]Freeman FG Kramarcy NR Lee J Physiol Behav 1973 8 11 273 4729167
  6. [6]Xu W Neuron 2012 3 8 73 990 22405208 PMC3319466
  7. [7]Dalley JW Cardinal RN Robbins TW Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2004 11 28 771 15555683
  8. [8]Wise SP Trends Neurosci 2008 12 31 599 18835649 PMC2587508
  9. [10]Braz JM Rico B Basbaum AI Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002 11 12 99 15148 12391304 PMC137558
  10. [12]Osakada F Neuron 2011 8 25 71 617 21867879 PMC3189471
  11. [13]Vertes RP Neuroscience 2006 9 29 142 1 16887277
  12. [14]Vertes RP Hoover WB Szigeti-Buck K Leranth C Brain Res Bull 2007 3 30 71 601 17292803 PMC4997812
  13. [15]Dolleman-van der Weel MJ Morris RG Witter MP Brain Struct Funct 2009 2 213 329 19132385
  14. [16]Loureiro M J Neurosci 2012 7 18 32 9947 22815509 PMC6621274
  15. [17]Lentiviruses were chosen for these experiments because they infect a small area of less than 0.8 mm diameter (Fig. 3A). TetTox inactivates all synaptic outputs from the N. reuniens. Neuroligin-2 is a synaptic adhesion molecule which is exclusively expressed in inhibitory synapses (Varoqueaux F Jamain S Brose N Eur J Cell Biol 2004 9 83 449 15540461), and inactivation of neuroligin-2 depresses the function of a subset of inhibitory synapses (Gibson JR Huber KM Sudhof TC J Neurosci 2009 11 4 29 13883 19889999 PMC2814361 Poulopoulos A Neuron 2009 9 10 63 628 19755106
  16. [18]Swanson LW Brain Res 1981 7 27 217 150 7260612
  17. [19]Wiltgen BJ Curr Biol 2010 8 10 20 1336 20637623 PMC2928141
  18. [20]Goshen I Cell 2011 10 28 147 678 22019004
  19. [21]Milanovic S Brain Res 1998 2 16 784 37 9518543
  20. [22]Lin JY Lin MZ Steinbach P Tsien RY Biophys J 2009 3 4 96 1803 19254539 PMC2717302
  21. [23]Because only limited information about the natural firing partterns of N. reuniens neurons is available (Morales GJ Ramcharan EJ Sundararaman N Morgera SD Vertes RP Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007 2007 2480 18002497 25), we first explored stimulation patterns to identify an optimal regimen. We found that tonic 4 Hz stimulus trains and phasic 15-pulse stimulus bursts (delivered at 30 Hz with 5 s intervals) produced significant but distinct behavioral effects, leading us to use these two stimulation paradigms for our experiments.
  22. [24]Dolleman-Van der Weel MJ Lopes da Silva FH Witter MP J Neurosci 1997 7 15 17 5640 9204945 PMC6793818
  23. [25]Zhang Y Yoshida T Katz DB Lisman JE J Neurophysiol 2012 6 107 3181 22423006 PMC3378362
  24. [26]Kumaran D McClelland JL Psychol Rev 2012 7 119 573 22775499 PMC3444305
  25. [27]McClelland JL McNaughton BL O'Reilly RC Psychol Rev 1995 7 102 419 7624455
  26. [30]Perkins CC Weyant RG Jr J Comp Physiol Psychol 1958 10 51 596 13587692
  27. [31]Wiltgen BJ Silva AJ Learn Mem 2007 4 14 313 17522020
  28. [32]Zhou Y Riccio DC Learn Motiv 1996 11 27 400 8979939
  29. [33]Eichenbaum H Neuron 2004 9 30 44 109 15450164
  30. [34]Eichenbaum H Dudchenko P Wood E Shapiro M Tanila H Neuron 1999 6 23 209 10399928
  31. [35]Howard MW Fotedar MS Datey AV Hasselmo ME Psychol Rev 2005 1 112 75 15631589 PMC1421376
  32. [36]McTighe SM Cowell RA Winters BD Bussey TJ Saksida LM Science 2010 12 3 330 1408 21127256
  33. [37]Groenewegen HJ Berendse HW Trends Neurosci 1994 2 17 52 7512768
  34. [38]Colgin LL Moser EI Moser MB Trends Neurosci 2008 9 31 469 18687478
  35. [39]Moita MA Rosis S Zhou Y LeDoux JE Blair HT J Neurosci 2004 8 4 24 7015 15295037 PMC6729593

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, W., & Südhof, T. C.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Xu, Wei
  • Südhof, Thomas C.
Venue
Science
Published
2013-03-15
Volume
339
Issue
6125
Pages
1290-1295
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1967531155
Cited by
634
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 13
FWCI
26.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K99MH099153, P50MH086403)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS077906, NS077906)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
memory specificity, nucleus reuniens, medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, neural circuits, post-traumatic stress disorder, optogenetic manipulation, neuronal firing patterns
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Animals, Brain Mapping, Fear, Generalization, Psychological, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neural Pathways, Synapses, Prefrontal Cortex, Midline Thalamic Nuclei, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Vesicle-Associated Membrane Protein 2, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review