The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experience-Expectant Plasticity in the Mushroom Bodies of the Honeybee
Abstract
Worker honeybees (Apis mellifera) were reared in social isolation in complete darkness to assess the effects of experience on growth of the neuropil of the mushroom bodies (MBs) during adult life. Comparison of the volume of the MBs of 1-day-old and 7-day-old bees showed that a significant increase in volume in the MB neuropil occurred during the first week of life in bees reared under these highly deprived conditions. All regions of the MB neuropil experienced a significant increase in volume with the exception of the basal ring. Measurement of titers of juvenile hormone (JH) in a subset of bees indicated that, as in previous studies, these rearing conditions induced in some bees the endocrine state of high JH associated with foraging, but there was no correlation between JH titer and volume of MB neuropil. Treatment of another subset of dark-reared bees with the JH analog, methoprene, also had no effect of the growth of the MB neuropil. These results demonstrate that there is a phase of MB neuropil growth early in the adult life of bees that occurs independent of light or any form of social interaction. Together with previous findings showing that an increase in MB neuropil volume begins around the time that orientation flights occur and then continues throughout the phase of life devoted to foraging, these results suggest that growth of the MB neuropil in adult bees may have both experience-expectant and experience-dependent components.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Developmental processes thus triggered by bGRNs may result in NN rewiring and growth (69) or changes of cell type proportions in the brain (70), serving as a major mechanism for feedback from bGRN to NN, and thus to future behavior.”
From Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain (2020) · cites this paper as [70]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology
(1985) · Journal of Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/0022-1910(85)90117-9 · Cited by 4,810
The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction*
Gundersen, H. J. G., & Jensen, E. B. V. (1987) · Journal of Microscopy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.1987.tb02837.x · Cited by 3,519
Gundersen, H. J. G., Bagger, P. V., Bendtsen, T. F., Evans, S. M., Korbo, L., Marcussen, N., Møller, A., Nielsen, K. N., Nyengaard, J. R., Pakkenberg, B., et al. (1988) · Apmis · doi:10.1111/j.1699-0463.1988.tb00954.x · Cited by 2,480
Winston, M. L. (1987) · Cited by 2,071
A Method for the Combined Staining of Cells and Fibers in the Nervous System
Klüver, H., & Barrera, E. (1953) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/00005072-195312040-00008 · Cited by 1,724
Black, J. E., Isaacs, K. R., Anderson, B. J., Alcantara, A. A., & Greenough, W. T. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.14.5568 · Cited by 1,161
Regulation of Division of Labor in Insect Societies
Robinson, G. E. (1992) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.003225 · Cited by 1,106
Self-citationNew stereological methods for counting neurons
West, M. J. (1993) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/0197-4580(93)90112-o · Cited by 940
Regulation Of Division Of Labor In Insect Societies
Robinson, G. E. (1992) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.37.1.637 · Cited by 886
Self-citationAssociative Odor Learning in Drosophila Abolished by Chemical Ablation of Mushroom Bodies
de Belle, J. S., & Heisenberg, M. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8303280 · Cited by 788
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Hunnicutt, 1989, A chiral specific antiserum for juvenile hormone., Am. Zool., 29, 48A
- Laidlaw H.H. (1977) Instrumental insemination of honey bee queens. (Dadant and Sons Press, Hamilton, IL).
Cited by
Farris, S. M., Robinson, G. E., & Fahrbach, S. E. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-16-06395.2001 · Cited by 272
Self-citationAn exploration of the social brain hypothesis in insects.
Lihoreau, M., Latty, T., & Chittka, L. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00442 · Cited by 118
On Being Small: Brain Allometry in Ants
Wehner, R., Fukushi, T., & Isler, K. (2007) · Brain, Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000097057 · Cited by 89
Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain
Sinha, S., Jones, B. M., Traniello, I. M., Bukhari, S. A., Halfon, M. S., Hofmann, H. A., Huang, S., Katz, P. S., Keagy, J., Lynch, V. J., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1921625117 · Cited by 85
Self-citationSocial complexity influences brain investment and neural operation costs in ants
Kamhi, J. F., Gronenberg, W., Robson, S. K. A., & Traniello, J. F. A. (2016) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.1949 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Fahrbach, S. E., Moore, D., Capaldi, E. A., Farris, S. M., & Robinson, G. E.
- Venue
- Learning & Memory
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 1998-05-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-123
- ISSN
- 1072-0502
- 1549-5485
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 48
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experience-Expectant Plasticity in the Mushroom Bodies of the Honeybee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/lm.5.1.115
- The paper
- Fahrbach, S. E., Moore, D., Capaldi, E. A., Farris, S. M., & Robinson, G. E. (1998). Experience-Expectant Plasticity in the Mushroom Bodies of the Honeybee. Learning & Memory. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.5.1.115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
