The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Construction of a quantum repeater with linear optics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
QEC with qubit-repetition codes and Calderbank-Shor-Steane codes were shown to be effective against imperfect quantum memories operation, photon losses and gate errors.
“Indeed, QEC with qubit-repetition codes and Calderbank-Shor-Steane codes [316] were shown to be effective against imperfect quantum memories operation, photon losses and gate errors [421].”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [421]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., & Wootters, W. K. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895 · Cited by 13,703
Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication
Briegel, H.-J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5932 · Cited by 3,481
Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device
Santori, C., Fattal, D., Vučković, J., Solomon, G. S., & Yamamoto, Y. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01086 · Cited by 1,559
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- W. Dür, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 59, 169, 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.169 · DOI · Paper page
- C.H. Bennett, 1996, Phys. Rev. Lett., 76, 722, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.722 · DOI · Paper page
- S. Bose, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 60, 194, 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.194 · DOI
- P.G. Kwiat, 2001, Nature (London), 409, 1014, 10.1038/35059017 · DOI · Paper page
- J.-W. Pan, 2001, Nature (London), 410, 1067, 10.1038/35074041 · DOI
- P. Kok, 2000, Phys. Rev. A, 61, 042304, 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.042304 · DOI · Paper page
- S.L. Braunstein, 1998, Nature (London), 394, 840, 10.1038/29674 · DOI
- O. Benson, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 2513, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2513 · DOI
- E. Moreau, 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 183601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.183601 · DOI
- M. Pelton, 2002, Eur. Phys. J. B, 18, 179
- M. Pelton, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 233602, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.233602 · DOI
- C. Santori, 2002, Phys. Rev. B, 66, 045308, 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.045308 · DOI
- P. Kok, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 66, 063814, 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.063814 · DOI · Paper page
- N. Lütkenhaus, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 59, 3295, 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.3295 · DOI · Paper page
- L. Vaidman, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 116, 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.116 · DOI · Paper page
- S.L. Braunstein, 1995, Phys. Rev. A, 51, R1727, 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.R1727 · DOI · Paper page
- T.B. Pittman, 2001, Phys. Rev. A, 64, 062311, 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062311 · DOI · Paper page
- T. Yamamoto, 2003, Nature (London), 421, 343, 10.1038/nature01358 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 770
All-photonic quantum repeaters
Azuma, K., Tamaki, K., & Lo, H.-K. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7787 · Cited by 583
Metadata
- Authors
- Kok, P., Williams, C. P., & Dowling, J. P.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review