Cited by 79

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measurement-induced nonlinearity in linear optics

Scheel, Stefan, Nemoto, Kae, Munro, William J., Knight, Peter L.·2003·Physical Review A

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.68.032310

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Operations that cause a change in the Fock layers (for instance the Hadamard operator) are generally difficult but not impossible.

    “For example, operations that cause a change in the Fock layers (for instance the Hadamard operator) are generally difficult but not impossible.”

    From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Scheel et al. (2003)

  • From fundamental gates, three CNOTs are required to build a quantum SWAP operation; from fundamental optical resources only two beam splitters and a phase shifter are necessary.

    “From fundamental gates, three CNOTs are required to build such an operation.However, from fundamental optical resources only two beam splitters and a phase shifter are necessary.”

    From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Scheel et al. (2003)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. D. Deutsch, 1989, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 425, 73, 10.1098/rspa.1989.0099 · DOI · Paper page
  2. P. Shor, 1995, Phys. Rev. A, 52, R2493, 10.1103/PhysRevA.52.R2493 · DOI · Paper page
  3. G.J. Milburn, 1988, Phys. Rev. Lett., 62, 2124, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2124 · DOI · Paper page
  4. A.P. Lund, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 66, 032307, 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.032307 · DOI
  5. T.C. Ralph, 2001, Phys. Rev. A, 65, 012314, 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.012314 · DOI · Paper page
  6. P. Kok, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 66, 063814, 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.063814 · DOI · Paper page
  7. T.B. Pittman, 2001, Phys. Rev. A, 64, 062311, 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062311 · DOI · Paper page
  8. A. Gilchrist, 2003, Phys. Rev. A, 040304, 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.040304 · DOI
  9. M. Koashi, 2001, Phys. Rev. A, 030301, 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.030301 · DOI · Paper page
  10. T.B. Pittman, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 257902, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.257902 · DOI
  11. T.B. Pittman, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 66, 052305, 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.052305 · DOI
  12. P. Kok, 2003, Phys. Rev. A, 68, 022301, 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.022301 · DOI · Paper page
  13. B. Yurke, 1986, Phys. Rev. A, 33, 4033, 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.4033 · DOI
  14. S. Prasad, 1987, Opt. Commun., 62, 139, 10.1016/0030-4018(87)90015-0 · DOI
  15. Z.Y. Ou, 1987, Opt. Commun., 118, 10.1016/0030-4018(87)90271-9 · DOI · Paper page
  16. H. Fearn, 1987, Opt. Commun., 485, 10.1016/0030-4018(87)90275-6 · DOI
  17. M.A. Campos, 1989, Phys. Rev. A, 40, 1371, 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.1371 · DOI
  18. U. Leonhardt, 1993, Phys. Rev. A, 3265, 10.1103/PhysRevA.48.3265 · DOI
  19. A.K. Ekert, 1990, Phys. Rev. A, 42, 487, 10.1103/PhysRevA.42.487 · DOI
  20. A.K. Ekert, 1991, Phys. Rev. A, 43, 3934, 10.1103/PhysRevA.43.3934 · DOI
  21. P. Törmä, 1996, Phys. Rev. A, 54, 4701, 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.4701 · DOI
  22. M. Reck, 1994, Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, 58, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58 · DOI · Paper page
  23. J. Clausen, 1999, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclassical Opt., 1, 332, 10.1088/1464-4266/1/3/306 · DOI
  24. A.I. Lvovsky, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 250401, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.250401 · DOI
  25. J. Clausen, 1999, Acta Phys. Slov., 49, 653
  26. C.H. Bennett, 1996, Phys. Rev. A, 53, 2046, 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2046 · DOI
  27. R.T. Thew, 2001, Phys. Rev. A, 63, 030302, 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.030302 · DOI
  28. R.T. Thew, 2001, Phys. Rev. A, 64, 022320, 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.022320 · DOI
  29. D. E. Browne, 2003, Phys. Rev. A, 67, 062320, 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.062320 · DOI · Paper page
  30. L. Knöll, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 59, 4716, 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4716 · DOI
  31. X. Ma, 1990, Phys. Rev. A, 41, 4625, 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.4625 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Scheel, S., Nemoto, K., Munro, W. J., & Knight, P. L.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2003-09-22
Volume
68
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
Cited by
79
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review