Cited by 443Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Optimal quantum circuits for general two-qubit gates

Open access
Vatan, Farrokh, Williams, Colin·2004·Physical Review A

Abstract

In order to demonstrate nontrivial quantum computations experimentally, such as the synthesis of arbitrary entangled states, it will be useful to understand how to decompose a desired quantum computation into the shortest possible sequence of one-qubit and two-qubit gates. We contribute to this effort by providing a method to construct an optimal quantum circuit for a general two-qubit gate that requires at most 3 controlled-NOT (CNOT) gates and 15 elementary one-qubit gates. Moreover, if the desired two-qubit gate corresponds to a purely real unitary transformation, we provide a construction that requries at most 2 CNOT and 12 one-qubit gates. We then prove that these constructions are optimal with respect to the family of CNOT, $y$-rotation, $z$-rotation, and phase gates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.69.032315

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A general process on a closed system can be described in terms of reversible channels on larger open systems for both quantum and classical theory.

    “It is possible to describe a general process on a closed system in terms of reversible channels on (larger) open systems for both quantum and classical theory [52,53].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vatan, F., & Williams, C.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2004-03-22
Volume
69
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2003656163
Cited by
443
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
quantum circuit optimization, CNOT gate, one-qubit gates, phase gate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review