The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hyperentanglement of two photons in three degrees of freedom
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A q-plate allows manipulation of OAM depending on the input polarization state.
“Lastly, interesting possibilities are offered by the qplate (QP), a device built on liquid crystals, polymers or sub-wavelength gratings that allows to manipulate OAM depending on the input polarization state [46,51,54,[59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66].”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [46]
The conclusion (page unavailable) mentions orbital angular momentum only as a possible degree of freedom for future work. The experimental-setup passage describes a quarter-wave plate, not a q-plate. Searches for q-plates and polarization-dependent OAM manipulation found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSingle photons carry quantized values of orbital angular momentum given by L = q.
“Correspondingly, single photons will carry quantized values of OAM given by L = q [46].”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- P. G. Kwiat, 1997, J. Mod. Opt., 44, 2173, 10.1080/09500349708231877 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.052110 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphys919 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.190501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.042317 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.180502 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.910 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.120503 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.160502 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.040404 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.140407 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.140406 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.157902 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.260501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.062305 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1155441 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2205 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012345 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gühne, O., & Tóth, G. (2009) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004 · Cited by 2,401
Photonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 770
Experimental realization of the Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm with a six-qubit cluster state
Vallone, G., Donati, G., Bruno, N., Chiuri, A., & Mataloni, P. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.050302 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vallone, G., Ceccarelli, R., De Martini, F., & Mataloni, P.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2009-03-09
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
