Cited by 204Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Experimental Realization of One-Way Quantum Computing with Two-Photon Four-Qubit Cluster States

Open access
Chen, Kai, Li, Che-Ming, Zhang, Qiang, Chen, Yu-Ao, Goebel, Alexander, Chen, Shuai, Mair, Alois, Pan, Jian-Wei·2007·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We report an experimental realization of one-way quantum computing on a two-photon four-qubit cluster state. This is accomplished by developing a two-photon cluster state source entangled both in polarization and spatial modes. With this special source, we implemented a highly efficient Grover's search algorithm and high-fidelity two-qubit quantum gates. Our experiment demonstrates that such cluster states could serve as an ideal source and a building block for rapid and precise optical quantum computation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.99.120503

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Demonstration experiments of key components of one-way quantum computation have been achieved using post-selection, demonstrating basic principles including simple algorithms and active feed forward.

    “However, demonstration experiments of the key components have been achieved, using post-selection 43-49 .”

    From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [48]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, K., Li, C.-M., Zhang, Q., Chen, Y.-A., Goebel, A., Chen, S., Mair, A., & Pan, J.-W.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2007-09-17
Volume
99
Issue
12
Pages
120503-120503
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1967698654
Cited by
204
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
24.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
one-way quantum computation, cluster states, four-qubit cluster state, polarization entanglement, spatial mode entanglement, Grover's algorithm, two-qubit gates, optical quantum computation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review