Cited by 132Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Realization and Characterization of a Two-Photon Four-Qubit Linear Cluster State

Open access
Vallone, Giuseppe, Pomarico, Enrico, Mataloni, Paolo, De Martini, Francesco, Berardi, Vincenzo·2007·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We report on the experimental realization of a four-qubit linear cluster state via two photons entangled both in polarization and linear momentum. This state was investigated by performing tomographic measurements and by evaluating an entanglement witness. By use of this state we carried out a novel nonlocality proof, the so-called "stronger two observer all-versus-nothing" test of quantum nonlocality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.98.180502

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Demonstration experiments of key components of one-way quantum computation have been achieved using post-selection, demonstrating basic principles including simple algorithms and active feed forward.

    “However, demonstration experiments of the key components have been achieved, using post-selection 43-49 .”

    From Measurement-based quantum computation (2009) · cites this paper as [47]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vallone, G., Pomarico, E., Mataloni, P., De Martini, F., & Berardi, V.
Affiliations
National Interuniversity Consortium for the Physical Sciences of Matter (IT)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2007-05-04
Volume
98
Issue
18
Pages
180502-180502
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2963024295
Cited by
132
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
26.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
four-qubit cluster state, linear cluster states, two-photon entanglement, polarization entanglement, entanglement witnesses, quantum nonlocality, quantum state tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review