CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum computer networks with the orbital angular momentum of light

Garcia-Escartin, Juan Carlos, Chamorro-Posada, Pedro·2012·Physical Review A
DOI 10.1103/physreva.86.032334
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.86.032334

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Path-encoded qubits and qudits are perfectly fit for photonic integrated circuits because waveguide arrays inherently implement spatial separation and coupling between modes is easily accomplished with directional couplers.

    “Path-encoded qubits, as well as qudits [119], are perfectly fit for photonic integrated circuits, since waveguide arrays inherently implement a spatial separation and coupling between modes is easily accomplished with directional couplers.”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [119]

    Section IV (Information Encoding; page unavailable) distinguishes path from the polarization degree of freedom used to encode the paper’s qubits. Searches for qudits, photonic integrated circuits, waveguide arrays, and directional couplers found no passage addressing the cited claim. Section VIII discusses limitations of OAM-based networks, not the suitability of path-encoded states for integrated circuits. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1109/JSTQE.2003.820918 · DOI
  2. 10.1088/1367-2630/13/12/123001 · DOI · Paper page
  3. W. Stallings, 2000, Data and Computer Communications
  4. 10.1088/1367-2630/13/6/063039 · DOI
  5. 10.1117/12.543338 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.024305 · DOI
  7. 10.1364/OL.37.002031 · DOI
  8. J. C. Garcia-Escartin, 2009, Quantum Inf. Comput., 9, 573
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.062320 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.110502 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.042324 · DOI
  12. L. Allen, 2003, Optical Angular Momentum, 10.1887/0750309016 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1364/OE.14.009093 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/09500349808230913 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0030-4018(96)00070-3 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2594 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1109/TC.1981.1675791 · DOI
  19. 10.1063/1.2752728 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.257901 · DOI
  21. 10.1364/OE.17.008287 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1364/OPEX.12.005448 · DOI
  23. 10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/382 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.032320 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2921 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5932 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Garcia-Escartin, J. C., & Chamorro-Posada, P.
Venue
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2012-09-25
Volume
86
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
DOI
10.1103/physreva.86.032334
Cited by
24
References
1
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review