The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-term performance of the SwissQuantum quantum key distribution network in a field environment
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“A solution to this issue consists in exploiting hyperentangled photons [44], leading to complete BM demonstrations in orbital angular momentum/polarization [324], momentum/polarization [325] and time/polarization [326,327].”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [324]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515
Self-citationQuantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing
Bennett, C. H., & Brassard, G. (2014) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025 · Cited by 8,299
New hash functions and their use in authentication and set equality
Wegman, M. N., & Carter, J. L. (1981) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(81)90033-7 · Cited by 1,402
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Bennett C H, 1984, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, 175
- 10.1145/1008908.1008920 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1301 · DOI
- 10.1038/385047a0 · DOI
- Elliott C, 2005, Quantum Information and Computation III, 138, 10.1117/12.606489 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/LPT.2009.2015058 · DOI
- Peev M, 2009, New J. Phys., 11, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/7/075001 · DOI · Paper page
- Chapuran T E, 2009, New J. Phys., 11, 105001, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/105001 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11434-009-0526-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1364/OE.18.027217 · DOI
- 10.1364/OL.35.002454 · DOI
- 10.1364/OE.19.010387 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1049/el:19970147 · DOI
- Peters N A, 2009, New J. Phys., 11
- Eraerds P, 2010, New J. Phys., 12, 10.1088/1367-2630/12/6/063027 · DOI
- Lancho D, 2010, QKD in standard optical telecommunications networks
- Choi I, 2011, New J. Phys., 13
- 10.1049/el:19981473 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.057901 · DOI
- 10.1007/3-540-48285-7_35 · DOI
- Krawczyk H Desmedt Y, 1994, Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO'94: 14th Annu. Int. Cryptology Conf., 129, 10.1007/3-540-48658-5_15 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-0000(79)90044-8 · DOI
- 10.1080/09500340108240905 · DOI
- Vakhitov A, 2001, J. Mod. Opt., 48, 2023, 10.1080/09500340108240904 · DOI
- Xu F, 2010, New J. Phys., 12
- 10.1038/nphoton.2010.214 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.032306 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3597221 · DOI
- Henzen L Carbognani F Felber N Fichtner W, 2008, Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on System-on-Chip, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum internet: a vision for the road ahead
Wehner, S., Elkouss, D., & Hanson, R. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam9288 · Cited by 2,467
Photonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 770
Kiktenko, E. O., Pozhar, N. O., Anufriev, M. N., Trushechkin, A. S., Yunusov, R. R., Kurochkin, Y. V., Lvovsky, A. I., & Fedorov, A. K. (2018) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aabc6b · Cited by 264
Quantum Key Distribution Networks - Key Management: A Survey
Dervisevic, E., Tankovic, A., Fazel, E., Kompella, R., Fazio, P., Voznak, M., & Mehic, M. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3730575 · Cited by 74
Garapo, K., Mafu, M., & Petruccione, F. (2016) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/25/7/070303 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Stucki, D., Legré, M., Buntschu, F., Clausen, B., Felber, N., Gisin, N., Henzen, L., Junod, P., Litzistorf, G., Monbaron, P., Monat, L., Page, J.-B., Perroud, D., Ribordy, G., Rochas, A., Robyr, S., Tavares, J., Thew, R., Trinkler, P., Ventura, S., Voirol, R., Walenta, N., & Zbinden, H.
- Venue
- New Journal of Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2011-12-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 123001
- ISSN
- 1367-2630
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
