The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coupling-deformed pointer observables and weak values
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The proposed methods are feasible based on previous experimental works.
“The similarity and feasibility of those two methods are discussed by considering the previous experimental works.”
From Direct measurement methods of density matrix of an entangled quantum state (2020) · cites this paper as [26]
The direct measurement of a photon polarization state in two-dimensional system and direct measurement of density matrix of a single photon polarization state in pure and mixed state cases showed the power of weak measurement technique in state determination processes.
“In particular, the direct measurement of a photon polarization state in two dimensional system [14] and direct measurement of density matrix of a single photon polarization state in pure and mixed state cases [26] showed the power of weak measurement technique in state determination processes.”
From Direct measurement methods of density matrix of an entangled quantum state (2020) · cites this paper as [26]
In recent work of Lundeen and co-workers, they experimentally reconstruct the density matrix elements of pure and mixed states of 2-dimensional system [26].
“In the recent work of Lundeen and his co-workers, they investigated their proposal which introduced in Ref. [11], and experimentally reconstruct the density matrix elements of pure and mixed states of 2-dimensional system [26].”
From Direct measurement methods of density matrix of an entangled quantum state (2020) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1351 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.11 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3518209 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.86.307 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10120 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms4115 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.053816 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.090402 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2013.24 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.070405 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.070402 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/srep01193 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.010404 · DOI
- M. A. Nielsen, 2000, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.052106 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.032106 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.022112 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.052111 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.052107 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.022122 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1152697 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.133603 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.010405 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.044103 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.240401 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.022123 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physrep.2012.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.230402 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.052109 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.040502 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1202218 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Direct measurement methods of density matrix of an entangled quantum state
Turek, Y. (2020) · Journal of Physics Communications · doi:10.1088/2399-6528/ab9938 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y.-X., Wu, S., & Chen, Z.-B.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2016-03-21
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2469-9926
- 2469-9934
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (11475084, 61125502)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
