CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Erasing the orbital angular momentum information of a photon

Nape, Isaac, Ndagano, Bienvenu, Forbes, Andrew·2017·Physical Review A
DOI 10.1103/physreva.95.053859
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.95.053859

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number of OAM modes is potentially unbounded and therefore challenging to characterize.

    “While, in fact, polarization encoding requires to resolve only two components, which can be done easily by means of waveplates and polarizing beam splitters, the number of OAM modes is potentially unbounded and as such challenging to characterize [68].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Results section says OAM offers an infinitely large Hilbert space, supporting the claim that the number of modes is potentially unbounded. The paper does not say that this makes OAM modes challenging to characterize; its detection scheme addresses a selected two-mode subspace. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1016/0375-9601(74)90132-7 · DOI
  2. 10.1209/0295-5075/1/4/004 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/RevModPhys.60.1067 · DOI
  4. G. I. Taylor, 1909, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.
  5. 10.1038/ncomms1263 · DOI
  6. N. Bohr, 1928, The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevD.19.473 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0375-9601(88)90114-4 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.54 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevA.25.2208 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/351111a0 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.033818 · DOI
  13. 10.1088/1367-2630/11/7/073035 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.042322 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.7729 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3034 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.1213201110 · DOI
  19. 10.1364/OL.39.005897 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015005 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.220402 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.8185 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/S0079-6638(08)70391-3 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/lpor.200810007 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/nphys607 · DOI
  26. 10.1088/2040-8978/19/1/013001 · DOI
  27. 10.1364/OE.18.018243 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.022115 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.163905 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1088/2040-8978/13/6/064001 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1364/AOP.8.000200 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1364/OE.17.008287 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1038/nphys1996 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1126/science.1227193 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nape, I., Ndagano, B., & Forbes, A.
Venue
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2017-05-24
Volume
95
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 2469-9926
  • 2469-9934
DOI
10.1103/physreva.95.053859
Cited by
24
References
2
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • Department of Science and Technology, Republic of South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review