CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 697

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Creation and detection of optical modes with spatial light modulators

Forbes, Andrew, Dudley, Angela, McLaren, Melanie·2016·Advances in Optics and Photonics
DOI 10.1364/aop.8.000200
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Modal decomposition of light has been known for a long time, applied mostly to pattern recognition. With the commercialization of liquid-crystal devices, digital holography as an enabling tool has become accessible to all, and with it all-digital tools for the decomposition of light have finally come of age. We review recent advances in unravelling the properties of light, from the modal structure of laser beams to decoding the information stored in orbital angular momentum (OAM)-carrying fields. We show application of these tools to fiber lasers, solid-state lasers, and structured light created in the laboratory by holographic laser beam shaping. We show by experimental implementation how digital holograms may be used to infer the intensity, phase, wavefront, Poynting vector, polarization, and OAM density of some unknown optical field. In particular, we outline how virtually all the previous ISO-standard beam diagnostic techniques may be readily replaced with all-digital equivalents, thus paving the way for unravelling of light in real time. Such tools are highly relevant to the in situ analysis of laser systems, to mode division multiplexing as an emerging tool in optical communication, and for quantum information processing with entangled photons.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/aop.8.000200

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OAM has enabled optimal quantum cloning of OAM-encoded qubits and photonic quantum walks in OAM states, with theoretical analyses and experimental demonstrations.

    “At a fundamental level, OAM has enabled researches on optimal quantum cloning of OAM-encoded qubits [66,81] and photonic quantum walks in the orbital angular momentum states, with theoretical analyses [82,83] and experimental demonstrations [51,54,60].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [81]

  • Alignment-free OAM states have unlocked advancements in free-space quantum key distribution and quantum communication with high bit exchange rates.

    “These features have unlocked a number of advancements in free-space quantum key distribution and quantum communication [67,81,86,[96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103] with high bit exchange rates [104,105].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [81]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 164

  1. Siegman, 1990, Proc. SPIE, 1224, 2, 10.1117/12.18425 · DOI
  2. Siegman, 1991, IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 27, 1146, 10.1109/3.83370 · DOI
  3. Boruah, 2009, Am. J. Phys., 77, 331, 10.1119/1.3054349 · DOI
  4. Pavlin, 2013, Eur. J. Phys., 34, 745, 10.1088/0143-0807/34/3/745 · DOI
  5. Huang, 2012, Am. J. Phys., 80, 211, 10.1119/1.3666834 · DOI
  6. Padgett, 2011, Nat. Photonics, 5, 343, 10.1038/nphoton.2011.81 · DOI
  7. Jack, 2009, New J. Phys., 11, 103024, 10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/103024 · DOI
  8. Willner, 2015, Adv. Opt. Photon., 7, 66, 10.1364/AOP.7.000066 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Maurer, 2011, Laser Photon. Rev., 5, 81, 10.1002/lpor.200900047 · DOI
  10. Nehmetallah, 2012, Adv. Opt. Photon., 4, 472, 10.1364/AOP.4.000472 · DOI
  11. Osten, 2014, Appl. Opt., 53, G44, 10.1364/AO.53.000G44 · DOI
  12. Memmolo, 2015, Adv. Opt. Photon., 7, 713, 10.1364/AOP.7.000713 · DOI
  13. Burger, 2015, J. Opt., 17, 015604, 10.1088/2040-8978/17/1/015604 · DOI
  14. Ngcobo, 2013, Nat. Commun., 4, 2289, 10.1038/ncomms3289 · DOI
  15. Kirk, 1971, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 61, 1023, 10.1364/JOSA.61.001023 · DOI
  16. Izatt, 1972, Appl. Opt., 11, 1407, 10.1364/AO.11.001407 · DOI
  17. Lee, 1974, Appl. Opt., 13, 1677, 10.1364/AO.13.001677 · DOI
  18. Lee, 1979, Appl. Opt., 18, 3661, 10.1364/AO.18.003661 · DOI
  19. Davis, 2003, Appl. Opt., 42, 2003, 10.1364/AO.42.002003 · DOI
  20. Bolduc, 2013, Opt. Lett., 38, 3546, 10.1364/OL.38.003546 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Cohn, 1994, Appl. Opt., 33, 4406, 10.1364/AO.33.004406 · DOI
  22. Cohn, 1998, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 15, 868, 10.1364/JOSAA.15.000868 · DOI
  23. Davis, 1999, Appl. Opt., 38, 5004, 10.1364/AO.38.005004 · DOI
  24. Arrizón, 2003, Opt. Lett., 28, 2521, 10.1364/OL.28.002521 · DOI
  25. Arrizón, 2003, Opt. Lett., 28, 1359, 10.1364/OL.28.001359 · DOI
  26. Arrizón, 2005, Opt. Express, 13, 7913, 10.1364/OPEX.13.007913 · DOI
  27. Arrizón, 2007, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 24, 3500, 10.1364/JOSAA.24.003500 · DOI
  28. Wong, 2008, Appl. Opt., 47, 602, 10.1364/AO.47.000602 · DOI
  29. Van Putten, 2008, Appl. Opt., 47, 2076, 10.1364/AO.47.002076 · DOI
  30. Agour, 2010, J. Opt., 12, 055401, 10.1088/2040-8978/12/5/055401 · DOI
  31. Jesacher, 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 4479, 10.1364/OE.16.004479 · DOI
  32. Ando, 2009, Opt. Lett., 34, 34, 10.1364/OL.34.000034 · DOI
  33. Bentley, 2006, Opt. Lett., 31, 649, 10.1364/OL.31.000649 · DOI
  34. Ohtake, 2007, Opt. Lett., 32, 1411, 10.1364/OL.32.001411 · DOI
  35. Dudley, 2012, Opt. Commun., 285, 5, 10.1016/j.optcom.2011.09.004 · DOI
  36. López-Mariscal, 2010, Opt. Lett., 35, 1215, 10.1364/OL.35.001215 · DOI
  37. Vasilyeu, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 23389, 10.1364/OE.17.023389 · DOI
  38. Rop, 2012, J. Mod. Opt., 59, 259, 10.1080/09500340.2011.631714 · DOI
  39. Ostrovsky, 2013, Opt. Lett., 38, 534, 10.1364/OL.38.000534 · DOI
  40. Maurer, 2007, New J. Phys., 9, 78, 10.1088/1367-2630/9/3/078 · DOI
  41. Dudley, 2013, Opt. Lett., 38, 3429, 10.1364/OL.38.003429 · DOI
  42. Wang, 2007, Opt. Lett., 32, 3549, 10.1364/OL.32.003549 · DOI
  43. Woerdemann, 2013, Laser Photon. Rev., 7, 839, 10.1002/lpor.201200058 · DOI
  44. MacDonald, 2002, Science, 296, 1101, 10.1126/science.1069571 · DOI
  45. Bowman, 2011, Eur. Phys. J., 199, 149
  46. Gruneisen, 2008, Appl. Opt., 47, A32, 10.1364/AO.47.000A32 · DOI
  47. Lima, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 3542, 10.1364/OE.19.003542 · DOI
  48. Zhang, 2014, Phys. Rev. A, 89, 043820, 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.043820 · DOI
  49. Spangenberg, 2014, Opt. Express, 22, 13870, 10.1364/OE.22.013870 · DOI
  50. Siegman, 1991, IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 27, 1098, 10.1109/3.83346 · DOI
  51. Siegman, 2000, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 6, 1380, 10.1109/2944.902192 · DOI
  52. Siegman, 2000, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 6, 1389, 10.1109/2944.902193 · DOI
  53. Strohaber, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 14321, 10.1364/OE.19.014321 · DOI
  54. Litvin, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 16760, 10.1364/OE.19.016760 · DOI
  55. Litvin, 2012, Opt. Express, 20, 10996, 10.1364/OE.20.010996 · DOI
  56. Durnin, 1987, Phys. Rev. Lett., 58, 1499, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1499 · DOI
  57. Pérez-Vizcaíno, 2012, J. Display Technol., 8, 539, 10.1109/JDT.2012.2200453 · DOI
  58. Schulze, 2012, Opt. Lett., 37, 4687, 10.1364/OL.37.004687 · DOI
  59. Schulze, 2015, Phys. Rev. A, 91, 043821, 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.043821 · DOI
  60. Davis, 2015, Opt. Eng., 54, 103101, 10.1117/1.OE.54.10.103101 · DOI
  61. Love, 1997, Appl. Opt., 36, 1517, 10.1364/AO.36.001517 · DOI
  62. Dudley, 2014, Opt. Express, 22, 14031, 10.1364/OE.22.014031 · DOI
  63. Duparre, 1998, Proc. SPIE, 3291, 104, 10.1117/12.310573 · DOI
  64. Duparre, 2000, Proc. SPIE, 4095, 40, 10.1117/12.405266 · DOI
  65. Kaiser, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 9347, 10.1364/OE.17.009347 · DOI
  66. Gori, 1998, Opt. Lett., 23, 989, 10.1364/OL.23.000989 · DOI
  67. Shapira, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 143902, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.143902 · DOI
  68. Duparré, 2005, Proc. SPIE, 5962, 59622G, 10.1117/12.625222 · DOI
  69. Soh, 2004, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 21, 1241, 10.1364/JOSAA.21.001241 · DOI
  70. Naidoo, 2012, Appl. Phys. B, 106, 683, 10.1007/s00340-011-4775-x · DOI
  71. Flamm, 2012, Opt. Lett., 37, 2478, 10.1364/OL.37.002478 · DOI
  72. Boruah, 2006, Opt. Express, 14, 10377, 10.1364/OE.14.010377 · DOI
  73. Neil, 2000, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 17, 1098, 10.1364/JOSAA.17.001098 · DOI
  74. Boruah, 2010, Opt. Lett., 35, 202, 10.1364/OL.35.000202 · DOI
  75. Schulze, 2012, Opt. Express, 20, 19714, 10.1364/OE.20.019714 · DOI
  76. Schulze, 2013, Appl. Opt., 52, 5312, 10.1364/AO.52.005312 · DOI
  77. Liu, 2011, Appl. Opt., 50, 1631, 10.1364/AO.50.001631 · DOI
  78. Andersen, 2009, Opt. Eng., 48, 085801, 10.1117/1.3204232 · DOI
  79. Hickmann, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 053904, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.053904 · DOI
  80. Mourka, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 5760, 10.1364/OE.19.005760 · DOI
  81. Mazilu, 2012, Appl. Phys. Lett., 100, 231115, 10.1063/1.4728111 · DOI
  82. Leach, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 257901, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.257901 · DOI
  83. Lavery, 2011, New J. Phys., 13, 093014, 10.1088/1367-2630/13/9/093014 · DOI
  84. Berkhout, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 153601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.153601 · DOI
  85. Lavery, 2013, New J. Phys., 15, 013024, 10.1088/1367-2630/15/1/013024 · DOI
  86. Dudley, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 165, 10.1364/OE.21.000165 · DOI
  87. Schulze, 2013, New J. Phys., 15, 073025, 10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073025 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Dudley, 2012, Appl. Opt., 51, 823, 10.1364/AO.51.000823 · DOI
  89. Schulze, 2012, Opt. Express, 20, 27866, 10.1364/OE.20.027866 · DOI
  90. Bartelt, 1983, Electron. Lett., 19, 247, 10.1049/el:19830170 · DOI
  91. Garitchev, 1985, Opt. Commun., 55, 403, 10.1016/0030-4018(85)90140-3 · DOI
  92. Schulze, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 3170, 10.1364/OE.21.003170 · DOI
  93. Flamm, 2013, J. Lightwave Technol., 31, 1023, 10.1109/JLT.2013.2240258 · DOI
  94. Paurisse, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 13000, 10.1364/OE.17.013000 · DOI
  95. Paurisse, 2012, Opt. Express, 20, 4074, 10.1364/OE.20.004074 · DOI
  96. Flamm, 2013, Opt. Lett., 38, 2128, 10.1364/OL.38.002128 · DOI
  97. Flamm, 2012, Appl. Opt., 51, 987, 10.1364/AO.51.000987 · DOI
  98. Flamm, 2010, Opt. Lett., 35, 3429, 10.1364/OL.35.003429 · DOI
  99. Golowich, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 4931, 10.1364/OE.21.004931 · DOI
  100. Dubois, 1994, Opt. Lett., 19, 433, 10.1364/OL.19.000433 · DOI
  101. Daria, 2004, Opt. Commun., 232, 229, 10.1016/j.optcom.2003.12.075 · DOI
  102. Stepniak, 2011, J. Lightwave Technol., 29, 1980, 10.1109/JLT.2011.2155621 · DOI
  103. Carpenter, 2012, J. Lightwave Technol., 30, 3946, 10.1109/JLT.2012.2206562 · DOI
  104. Koebele, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 16593, 10.1364/OE.19.016593 · DOI
  105. Berdagué, 1982, Appl. Opt., 21, 1950, 10.1364/AO.21.001950 · DOI
  106. Richardson, 2013, Nat. Photonics, 7, 354, 10.1038/nphoton.2013.94 · DOI
  107. Gibson, 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 5448, 10.1364/OPEX.12.005448 · DOI
  108. Bozinovic, 2013, Science, 340, 1545, 10.1126/science.1237861 · DOI
  109. Huang, 2014, Opt. Lett., 39, 197, 10.1364/OL.39.000197 · DOI
  110. Wang, 2012, Nat. Photonics, 6, 488, 10.1038/nphoton.2012.138 · DOI · Paper page
  111. Poletti, 2013, Nat. Photonics, 7, 279, 10.1038/nphoton.2013.45 · DOI
  112. Carpenter, 2013, Opt. Express, 21, 28794, 10.1364/OE.21.028794 · DOI · Paper page
  113. Milione, 2015, Opt. Lett., 40, 1980, 10.1364/OL.40.001980 · DOI
  114. Milione, 2015, Opt. Lett., 40, 4887, 10.1364/OL.40.004887 · DOI
  115. Huang, 2015, Sci. Rep., 5, 14931, 10.1038/srep14931 · DOI · Paper page
  116. Xie, 2015, Optica, 2, 357, 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000357 · DOI
  117. Ren, 2015, Opt. Lett., 40, 2249, 10.1364/OL.40.002249 · DOI
  118. Bell, 1966, Rev. Mod. Phys., 38, 447, 10.1103/RevModPhys.38.447 · DOI · Paper page
  119. Aspect, 1982, Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 91, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91 · DOI · Paper page
  120. Shih, 1988, Phys. Rev. Lett., 61, 2921, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2921 · DOI · Paper page
  121. Mair, 2001, Nature, 412, 313, 10.1038/35085529 · DOI · Paper page
  122. Vaziri, 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 240401, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.240401 · DOI · Paper page
  123. Molina-Terriza, 2007, Nat. Phys., 3, 305, 10.1038/nphys607 · DOI
  124. Yao, 2006, Opt. Express, 14, 13089, 10.1364/OE.14.013089 · DOI
  125. Stütz, 2007, Appl. Phys. Lett., 90, 261114, 10.1063/1.2752728 · DOI
  126. Lima, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 10688, 10.1364/OE.17.010688 · DOI
  127. Fano, 1957, Rev. Mod. Phys., 29, 74, 10.1103/RevModPhys.29.74 · DOI · Paper page
  128. Thew, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 66, 012303, 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.012303 · DOI
  129. de Burgh, 2008, Phys. Rev. A, 78, 052122, 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.052122 · DOI
  130. Jack, 2010, Phys. Rev. A, 81, 043844, 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.043844 · DOI
  131. Padgett, 1999, Opt. Lett., 24, 430, 10.1364/OL.24.000430 · DOI
  132. Agnew, 2011, Phys. Rev. A, 84, 062101, 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.062101 · DOI · Paper page
  133. McLaren, 2013, Phys. Rev. A, 88, 033818, 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.033818 · DOI
  134. Karimi, 2014, Phys. Rev. A, 89, 013829, 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.013829 · DOI · Paper page
  135. Zhang, 2014, Opt. Express, 22, 17039, 10.1364/OE.22.017039 · DOI
  136. Salakhutdinov, 2012, Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 173604, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.173604 · DOI
  137. Adamson, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 030406, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.030406 · DOI
  138. Fernández-Pérez, 2011, Phys. Rev. A, 83, 052332, 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.052332 · DOI
  139. Giovannini, 2013, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 143601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.143601 · DOI · Paper page
  140. Spengler, 2012, Phys. Rev. A, 86, 022311, 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.022311 · DOI
  141. Yao, 2006, Opt. Express, 14, 9071, 10.1364/OE.14.009071 · DOI
  142. Leach, 2010, Science, 329, 662, 10.1126/science.1190523 · DOI
  143. Torres, 2003, Phys. Rev. A, 68, 050301, 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.050301 · DOI · Paper page
  144. Pires, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 104, 020505, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.020505 · DOI
  145. Pors, 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 120502, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.120502 · DOI
  146. Romero, 2012, Phys. Rev. A, 86, 012334, 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.012334 · DOI
  147. Dada, 2011, Nat. Phys., 7, 677, 10.1038/nphys1996 · DOI · Paper page
  148. Krenn, 2013, Phys. Rev. A, 87, 012326, 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.012326 · DOI
  149. Krenn, 2014, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 6243, 10.1073/pnas.1402365111 · DOI
  150. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 3313, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3313 · DOI
  151. Scarani, 2009, Rev. Mod. Phys., 81, 1301, 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1301 · DOI
  152. Vallone, 2014, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 060503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.060503 · DOI
  153. Mirhosseini, 2015, New J. Phys., 17, 033033, 10.1088/1367-2630/17/3/033033 · DOI
  154. Hiskett, 2006, New J. Phys., 8, 193, 10.1088/1367-2630/8/9/193 · DOI
  155. Ursin, 2007, Nat. Phys., 3, 481, 10.1038/nphys629 · DOI · Paper page
  156. Pors, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 6671, 10.1364/OE.19.006671 · DOI · Paper page
  157. Malik, 2012, Opt. Express, 20, 13195, 10.1364/OE.20.013195 · DOI
  158. Rodenburg, 2012, Opt. Lett., 37, 3735, 10.1364/OL.37.003735 · DOI · Paper page
  159. Krenn, 2014, New J. Phys., 16, 113028, 10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/113028 · DOI
  160. Paterson, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 153901, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.153901 · DOI · Paper page
  161. Gopaul, 2007, New J. Phys., 9, 94, 10.1088/1367-2630/9/4/094 · DOI · Paper page
  162. Tyler, 2009, Opt. Lett., 34, 142, 10.1364/OL.34.000142 · DOI
  163. Roux, 2011, Phys. Rev. A, 83, 053822, 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.053822 · DOI · Paper page
  164. Hamadou Ibrahim, 2013, Phys. Rev. A, 88, 012312, 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.012312 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Forbes, A., Dudley, A., & McLaren, M.
Venue
Advances in Optics and Photonics
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2016-04-26
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
200
ISSN
1943-8206
DOI
10.1364/aop.8.000200
Cited by
697
References
6
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review