The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thermal boundary resistance and thermal conductivity of multiwalled carbon nanotubes
Abstract
Thermal boundary resistance (Kapitza resistance) and thermal conductivity of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) are calculated assuming the properties of graphite in the temperature range of $10--100\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$. By including the thermal boundary resistance between the MWCNT and the measuring device, calculated thermal conductivity of MWCNT is in very good agreement with the experimental data of Kim et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 215502 (2001)], showing that the thermal behavior of MWCNTs is similar to graphite. Thermal conductivity of MWCNT as measured by Kim et al. is smaller than the thermal conductivity of graphite fibers and pyrolytic graphite at low temperatures due to thermal boundary resistance. The intrinsic mean free path of phonons in MWCNTs in the temperature range of $10--100\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$ is found to be similar to the mean free path in graphite fibers. Finally, it is shown that the thermal boundary resistance could be one of the main reasons that the thermal conductivity of MWCNT bundles as measured by Kim et al. is lower than the thermal conductivity of a single MWCNT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thermal Transport Measurements of Individual Multiwalled Nanotubes
Kim, P., Shi, L., Majumdar, A., & McEuen, P. L. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.215502 · Cited by 3,378
Thermal Interface Materials: Historical Perspective, Status, and Future Directions
Prasher, R. (2006) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.879796 · Cited by 927
Self-citationShi, L., Li, D., Yu, C., Jang, W., Kim, D., Yao, Z., Kim, P., & Majumdar, A. (2003) · Journal of Heat Transfer · doi:10.1115/1.1597619 · Cited by 733
Cited by
Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes and their polymer nanocomposites: A review
Han, Z., & Fina, A. (2011) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.004 · Cited by 2,603
Nanostructured thermoelectrics
Pichanusakorn, P., & Bandaru, P. (2010) · Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.mser.2009.10.001 · Cited by 554
Lin, Z., Liu, Y., Raghavan, S., Moon, K.-S., Sitaraman, S. K., & Wong, C.-P. (2013) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am401939z · Cited by 469
Lian, G., Tuan, C.-C., Li, L., Jiao, S., Wang, Q., Moon, K.-S., Cui, D., & Wong, C.-P. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01595 · Cited by 382
Thermal contact resistance between graphene and silicon dioxide
Chen, Z., Jang, W., Bao, W., Lau, C. N., & Dames, C. (2009) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3245315 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Prasher, R.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-02-25
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 1098-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-235X
- OpenAlex
- W2002178326
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
