The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum Zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition
Open accessAbstract
We introduce and explore a one-dimensional ``hybrid'' quantum circuit model consisting of both unitary gates and projective measurements. While the unitary gates are drawn from a random distribution and act uniformly in the circuit, the measurements are made at random positions and times throughout the system. By varying the measurement rate we can tune between the volume law entangled phase for the random unitary circuit model (no measurements) and a ``quantum Zeno phase'' where strong measurements suppress the entanglement growth to saturate in an area law. Extensive numerical simulations of the quantum trajectories of the many-particle wave functions (exploiting Clifford circuitry to access systems up to 512 qubits) provide evidence for a stable ``weak measurement phase'' that exhibits volume-law entanglement entropy, with a coefficient decreasing with increasing measurement rate. We also present evidence for a continuous quantum dynamical phase transition between the ``weak measurement phase'' and the ``quantum Zeno phase,'' driven by a competition between the entangling tendencies of unitary evolution and the disentangling tendencies of projective measurements. Detailed steady-state and dynamic critical properties of this quantum entanglement transition are accessed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition
Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 · Cited by 8,436
Ryu, S., & Takayanagi, T. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.181602 · Cited by 4,302
Entanglement Entropy and Quantum Field Theory
Calabrese, P., & Cardy, J. (2004) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/0405152 · Cited by 3,275
Chaos and quantum thermalization
Srednicki, M. (1994) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.50.888 · Cited by 3,175
Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system
Deutsch, J. M. (1991) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.43.2046 · Cited by 2,860
Quantum cognition: The possibility of processing with nuclear spins in the brain
Fisher, M. P. A. (2015) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2015.08.020 · Cited by 259
Cited by
Measurement-driven entanglement transition in hybrid quantum circuits
Li, Y., Chen, X., & Fisher, M. P. A. (2019) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.134306 · Cited by 593
Self-citationUnitary-projective entanglement dynamics
Chan, A., Nandkishore, R. M., Pretko, M., & Smith, G. (2019) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.224307 · Cited by 474
Quantum Error Correction in Scrambling Dynamics and Measurement-Induced Phase Transition
Choi, S., Bao, Y., Qi, X.-L., & Altman, E. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.030505 · Cited by 435
Dynamical Purification Phase Transition Induced by Quantum Measurements
Gullans, M. J., & Huse, D. A. (2020) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.041020 · Cited by 391
Scalable Probes of Measurement-Induced Criticality
Gullans, M. J., & Huse, D. A. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.070606 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y., Chen, X., & Fisher, M. P. A.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2018-11-19
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 20
- ISSN
- 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9969
- OpenAlex
- W2886712022
- Cited by
- 707
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 16.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.