Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Importance of correlations and fluctuations on the initial source eccentricity in high-energy nucleus-nucleus collisions

Open access
Alver, B., Back, B. B., Baker, M. D., Ballintijn, M., Barton, D. S., Betts, R. R., Bindel, R., Busza, W., Chetluru, V., García, E., Gburek, T., Hamblen, J., Heinz, U., Hofman, D. J., Hollis, R. S., Iordanova, A., Li, W., Loizides, C., Manly, S., Mignerey, A. C., Nouicer, R., Olszewski, A., Reed, C., Roland, C., Roland, G., Sagerer, J., Steinberg, P., Stephans, G. S. F., Tonjes, M. B., Trzupek, A., Nieuwenhuizen, G. J. van, Vaurynovich, S. S., Verdier, R., Veres, G. I., Walters, P., Wenger, E., Wosiek, B., Woźniak, K., Wyslouch, B.·2008·Physical Review C

Abstract

In relativistic heavy-ion collisions, anisotropic collective flow is driven, event by event, by the initial eccentricity of the matter created in the nuclear overlap zone. Interpretation of the anisotropic flow data thus requires a detailed understanding of the effective initial source eccentricity of the event sample. In this paper, we investigate various ways of defining this effective eccentricity using the Monte Carlo Glauber (MCG) approach. In particular, we examine the participant eccentricity, which quantifies the eccentricity of the initial source shape by the major axes of the ellipse formed by the interaction points of the participating nucleons. We show that reasonable variation of the density parameters in the Glauber calculation, as well as variations in how matter production is modeled, do not significantly modify the already established behavior of the participant eccentricity as a function of collision centrality. Focusing on event-by-event fluctuations and correlations of the distributions of participating nucleons, we demonstrate that, depending on the achieved event-plane resolution, fluctuations in the elliptic flow magnitude ${v}_{2}$ lead to most measurements being sensitive to the root-mean-square rather than the mean of the ${v}_{2}$ distribution. Neglecting correlations among participants, we derive analytical expressions for the participant eccentricity cumulants as a function of the number of participating nucleons, ${N}_{\mathrm{part}}$, keeping nonnegligible contributions up to $\mathcal{O}(1/{N}_{\mathrm{part}}^{3})$. We find that the derived expressions yield the same results as obtained from mixed-event MCG calculations which remove the correlations stemming from the nuclear collision process. Most importantly, we conclude from the comparison with MCG calculations that the fourth-order participant eccentricity cumulant does not approach the spatial anisotropy obtained assuming a smooth nuclear matter distribution. In particular, for the Cu+Cu system, these quantities deviate from each other by almost a factor of 2 over a wide range in centrality. This deviation reflects the essential role of participant spatial correlations in the interaction of two nuclei.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevc.77.014906

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Alver, B., Back, B. B., Baker, M. D., Ballintijn, M., Barton, D. S., Betts, R. R., Bindel, R., Busza, W., Chetluru, V., García, E., Gburek, T., Hamblen, J., Heinz, U., Hofman, D. J., Hollis, R. S., Iordanova, A., Li, W., Loizides, C., Manly, S., Mignerey, A. C., Nouicer, R., Olszewski, A., Reed, C., Roland, C., Roland, G., Sagerer, J., Steinberg, P., Stephans, G. S. F., Tonjes, M. B., Trzupek, A., Nieuwenhuizen, G. J. V., Vaurynovich, S. S., Verdier, R., Veres, G. I., Walters, P., Wenger, E., Wosiek, B., Woźniak, K., & Wyslouch, B.
Venue
Physical Review C
Published
2008-01-31
Volume
77
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-490X
OpenAlex
W2048031850
Cited by
275
References
31
FWCI
11.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.