Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 410

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fully integrated transport approach to heavy ion reactions with an intermediate hydrodynamic stage

Open access
Petersen, Hannah, Steinheimer, Jan, Burau, Gerhard, Bleicher, Marcus, Stöcker, Horst·2008·Physical Review C

Abstract

We present a coupled Boltzmann and hydrodynamics approach to relativistic heavy ion reactions. This hybrid approach is based on the Ultra-relativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics (UrQMD) transport approach with an intermediate hydrodynamical evolution for the hot and dense stage of the collision. Event-by-event fluctuations are directly taken into account via the nonequilibrium initial conditions generated by the initial collisions and string fragmentations in the microscopic UrQMD model. After a ($3+1$)-dimensional ideal hydrodynamic evolution, the hydrodynamical fields are mapped to hadrons via the Cooper-Frye equation and the subsequent hadronic cascade calculation within UrQMD proceeds to incorporate the important final state effects for a realistic freeze-out. This implementation allows us to compare pure microscopic transport calculations with hydrodynamic calculations using exactly the same initial conditions and freeze-out procedure. The effects of the change in the underlying dynamics---ideal fluid dynamics versus nonequilibrium transport theory---is explored. The freeze-out and initial state parameter dependencies are investigated for different observables. The time evolution of the baryon density and particle yields are also discussed. We find that the final pion and proton multiplicities are lower in the hybrid model calculation owing to the isentropic hydrodynamic expansion whereas the yields for strange particles are enhanced owing to the local equilibrium in the hydrodynamic evolution. The results of the different calculations for the mean transverse mass excitation function, rapidity, and transverse mass spectra for different particle species at three different beam energies are discussed in the context of the available data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevc.78.044901

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 410

Metadata

Authors
Petersen, H., Steinheimer, J., Burau, G., Bleicher, M., & Stöcker, H.
Venue
Physical Review C
Published
2008-10-07
Volume
78
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-490X
OpenAlex
W2040316568
Cited by
410
References
4
FWCI
11.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.