The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In-medium similarity renormalization group with chiral two- plus three-nucleon interactions
Open accessAbstract
We use the recently proposed in-medium similarity renormalization group (IM-SRG) to carry out a systematic study of closed-shell nuclei up to ${}^{56}\mathrm{Ni}$, based on chiral two- plus three-nucleon interactions. We analyze the capabilities of the IM-SRG by comparing our results for the ground-state energy to coupled cluster calculations, as well as to quasiexact results from the importance-truncated no-core shell model. Using chiral two- plus three-nucleon Hamiltonians whose resolution scales are lowered by free-space SRG evolution, we obtain good agreement with experimental binding energies in ${}^{4}\mathrm{He}$ and the closed-shell oxygen isotopes, while the calcium and nickel isotopes are somewhat overbound.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modern theory of nuclear forces
Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W., & Meißner, U.-G. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1773 · Cited by 1,883
Cited by
Coupled-cluster computations of atomic nuclei
Hagen, G., Papenbrock, T., Hjorth-Jensen, M., & Dean, D. J. (2014) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/096302 · Cited by 531
High-quality two-nucleon potentials up to fifth order of the chiral expansion
Entem, D. R., Machleidt, R., & Nosyk, Y. (2017) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.024004 · Cited by 355
Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles
Gysbers, P., Hagen, G., Holt, J. D., Jansen, G. R., Morris, T. D., Navrátil, P., Papenbrock, T., Quaglioni, S., Schwenk, A., Stroberg, S. R., et al. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0450-7 · Cited by 348
Self-citationQuantum Monte Carlo Calculations with Chiral Effective Field Theory Interactions
Gezerlis, A., Tews, I., Epelbaum, E., Gandolfi, S., Hebeler, K., Nogga, A., & Schwenk, A. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.032501 · Cited by 317
Self-citationA Guided Tour of ab initio Nuclear Many-Body Theory
Hergert, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00379 · Cited by 269
Self-citationNonempirical Interactions for the Nuclear Shell Model: An Update
Stroberg, S. R., Hergert, H., Bogner, S. K., & Holt, J. D. (2019) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021120 · Cited by 253
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hergert, H., Bogner, S. K., Binder, S., Calci, A., Langhammer, J., Roth, R., & Schwenk, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review C
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-03-06
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0556-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-490X
- OpenAlex
- W2022871871
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
