Cited by 59Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Proposal for solving the ‘‘problem of time’’ in canonical quantum gravity

Open access
Wald, Robert M.·1993·Physical Review D

Abstract

The ``problem of time'' in canonical quantum gravity refers to the difficulties involved in defining a Hilbert space structure on states, and local observables on this Hilbert space, for a theory in which the spacetime metric is treated as a quantum field, so no classical metrical or causal structure is present on spacetime. We describe an approach, much in the spirit of ideas proposed by Misner, Kucha\ifmmode \check{r}\else \v{r}\fi{}, and others, to defining states and local observables in quantum gravity which exploits the analogy between the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity and that of a relativistic particle. In the case of minisuperspace models, a concrete theory is obtained which appears to be mathematically and physically viable, although it contains some radical features with regard to the presence of an ``arrow of time.'' The viability of this approach in the case of infinitely many degrees of freedom rests on a number of fairly well-defined issues, which, however, remain unresolved. As a by-product of our analysis, the theory of a relativistic particle in curved spacetime is developed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.48.r2377

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Procedures based on a Klein-Gordon type inner product instead describe the universe as expanding forever.

    “procedures based on a Klein-Gordon type inner product instead describe the universe as expanding 'forever' [4].”

    From Quantum observables and recollapsing dynamics (1995) · cites this paper as [4]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3][3] K. Kuchar, in Proceedings of the 4th Canadian Conference on Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics ed. by G. Kunstatter, D. Vincent, and J. Williams, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992). -
  2. [8][8] A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A346 , 375 (1975). B.S. Kay, Commun. Math. Phys. 62 , 55 (1978). -
  3. [18][18] The main issues involved in (1) and (5) are closely related to the issue of isolating the 'true dynamical degrees of freedom' of the classical gravitational field. If a suitable 'gauge fixing' and 'deparametrization' of classical general relativity could be accomplished, then it should be possible to resolve these issues in the manner described in A.O. Barvinsky, Phys. Rep. (in press). -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wald, R. M.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Wald, Robert M.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1993-09-15
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
R2377-R2381
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081097082
Cited by
59
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
problem of time, canonical quantum gravity, Hilbert space structure, local observables, minisuperspace model, arrow of time, Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity, quantum spacetime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review