Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hawking spectrum and high frequency dispersion

Open access
Corley, Steven, Jacobson, Ted·1996·Physical Review D

Abstract

We study the spectrum of created particles in two-dimensional black hole geometries for a linear, Hermitian scalar field satisfying a Lorentz noninvariant field equation with higher spatial derivative terms that are suppressed by powers of a fundamental momentum scale ${k}_{0}$. The preferred frame is the "free-fall frame" of the black hole. This model is a variation of Unruh's sonic black hole analogy. We find that there are two qualitatively different types of particle production in this model: a thermal Hawking flux generated by "mode conversion" at the black hole horizon, and a nonthermal spectrum generated via scattering off the background into negative free-fall frequency modes. This second process has nothing to do with black holes and does not occur for the ordinary wave equation because such modes do not propagate outside the horizon with positive Killing frequency. The horizon component of the radiation is astonishingly close to a perfect thermal spectrum: for the smoothest metric studied, with Hawking temperature ${T}_{H}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.0008{k}_{0}$, agreement is of order ${(\frac{{T}_{H}}{{k}_{0}})}^{3}$ at frequency $\ensuremath{\omega}={T}_{H}$, and agreement to order $\frac{{T}_{H}}{{k}_{0}}$ persists out to $\frac{\ensuremath{\omega}}{{T}_{H}}\ensuremath{\simeq}45$ where the thermal number flux is \ensuremath{\sim}${10}^{\ensuremath{-}20}$. The flux from scattering dominates at large $\ensuremath{\omega}$ and becomes many orders of magnitude larger than the horizon component for metrics with a "kink," i.e., a region of high curvature localized on a static world line outside the horizon. This nonthermal flux amounts to roughly 10% of the total luminosity for the kinkier metrics considered. The flux exhibits oscillations as a function of frequency which can be explained by interference between the various contributions to the flux.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.54.1568

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 398

Metadata

Authors
Corley, S., & Jacobson, T.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1996-07-15
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
1568-1586
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W2113544715
Cited by
398
References
24
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hawking spectrum and high frequency dispersion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.54.1568
The paper
Corley, S., & Jacobson, T. (1996). Hawking spectrum and high frequency dispersion. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.54.1568

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.