Cited by 42Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quasiopen inflation

Open access

Abstract

We show that a large class of two-field models of single-bubble open inflation does not lead to infinite open universes, as was previously thought, but to an ensemble of very large but finite inflating ``islands.'' The reason is that the quantum tunneling responsible for the nucleation of the bubble does not occur simultaneously along both field directions and equal-time hypersurfaces in the open universe are not synchronized with equal-density or fixed-field hypersurfaces. The most probable tunneling trajectory corresponds to a zero value of the inflaton field; large values, necessary for the second period of inflation inside the bubble, only arise as localized fluctuations. The interior of each nucleated bubble will contain an infinite number of such inflating regions of comoving size of order ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}^{\ensuremath{-}1},$ where \ensuremath{\gamma} is the supercurvature eigenvalue, which depends on the parameters of the model. Each one of these islands will be a quasi-open universe. Since the volume of the hyperboloid is infinite, inflating islands with all possible values of the field at their center will be realized inside of a single bubble. We may happen to live in one of those patches of comoving size $d\ensuremath{\lesssim}{\ensuremath{\gamma}}^{\ensuremath{-}1},$ where the universe appears to be open. In particular, we consider the ``supernatural'' model proposed by Linde and Mezhlumian. There, an approximate $U(1)$ symmetry is broken by a tunneling field in a first order phase transition, and slow-roll inflation inside the nucleated bubble is driven by the pseudo Goldstone field. We find that the excitations of the pseudo Goldstone field produced by the nucleation and subsequent expansion of the bubble place severe constraints on this model. We also discuss the coupled and uncoupled two-field models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.57.4669

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inflating domain walls can excite the inflaton field, causing it to jump back to the inflationary plateau, or they may cause transitions to any of the accessible neighboring vacua.

    “In particular, they can excite the inflaton field, causing it to jump back to the inflationary plateau [29,30], or they may cause transitions to any of the accessible neighboring vacua [31].”

    From Black holes and the multiverse (2016) · cites this paper as [30]

    The paper’s opening summary (p. 1) says bubble nucleation and expansion produce excitations of the slow-roll field. Section IV (p. 7) describes topologically inflating domain walls, but neither passage says those walls drive the inflaton back onto an inflationary plateau. The neighboring-vacua clause is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. S. Coleman, 1977, Phys. Rev. D, 15, 2929, 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2929 · DOI · Paper page
  2. J.R. Gott, 1982, Nature (London), 295, 304, 10.1038/295304a0 · DOI
  3. J.R. Gott, 1984, Phys. Lett., 136B, 157, 10.1016/0370-2693(84)91171-7 · DOI
  4. M. Sasaki, 1993, Phys. Lett. B, 317, 510, 10.1016/0370-2693(93)91364-S · DOI
  5. K. Yamamoto, 1995, Astrophys. J., 455, 412, 10.1086/176588 · DOI · Paper page
  6. M. Bucher, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 3314, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.3314 · DOI · Paper page
  7. M. Bucher, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 5538, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.5538 · DOI
  8. A. Linde, 1995, Phys. Lett. B, 351, 99, 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00370-Z · DOI
  9. A. Linde, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 6789, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.6789 · DOI
  10. A.M. Green, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 609, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.609 · DOI
  11. J. García-Bellido, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 4603, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.4603 · DOI
  12. J. García-Bellido, 1997, Phys. Lett. B, 398, 18, 10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00211-6 · DOI
  13. J. García-Bellido, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 7480, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.7480 · DOI
  14. M. Sasaki, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 4705, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.R4705 · DOI
  15. M. Sasaki, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 51, 2979, 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.2979 · DOI · Paper page
  16. D.H. Lyth, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 3338, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.3338 · DOI
  17. J. García-Bellido, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 6750, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.6750 · DOI
  18. J. García-Bellido, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 4596, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.4596 · DOI
  19. T. Tanaka, 1997, Prog. Theor. Phys., 97, 243, 10.1143/PTP.97.243 · DOI
  20. M. Bucher, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 7461, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.7461 · DOI
  21. M. Sasaki, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 56, 616, 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.616 · DOI
  22. J. García-Bellido, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 3225, 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.3225 · DOI
  23. J. Garriga, 1998, Nucl. Phys., B513, 343, 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00780-3 · DOI · Paper page
  24. J. García-Bellido, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 2473, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.2473 · DOI
  25. J. Garriga, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 4764, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.4764 · DOI
  26. K. Yamamoto, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 5031, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.5031 · DOI · Paper page
  27. J.D. Cohn, 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 7215, 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.7215 · DOI
  28. S.W. Hawking, 1983, Nucl. Phys., B224, 180, 10.1016/0550-3213(83)90319-X · DOI
  29. R. Basu, 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 46, 2345, 10.1103/PhysRevD.46.2345 · DOI · Paper page
  30. R. Basu, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 50, 7150, 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.7150 · DOI
  31. A. Vilenkin, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 548, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.548 · DOI
  32. J. Garriga, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 56, 2439, 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.2439 · DOI
  33. A.D. Linde, 1994, Phys. Lett. B, 327, 208, 10.1016/0370-2693(94)90719-6 · DOI
  34. A. Vilenkin, 1994, Phys. Rev. Lett., 72, 3137, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3137 · DOI
  35. A.D. Linde, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 50, 2456, 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.2456 · DOI
  36. J. Garriga, 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 45, 3469, 10.1103/PhysRevD.45.3469 · DOI
  37. N.D. Birrell, 1982, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, 10.1017/CBO9780511622632 · DOI · Paper page
  38. T. Vachaspati, 1991, Phys. Rev. D, 43, 3846, 10.1103/PhysRevD.43.3846 · DOI
  39. T. Tanaka, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 1039, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.1039 · DOI
  40. T. Tanaka, 1994, Phys. Rev. D, 6444, 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.6444 · DOI
  41. A. Kusenko, 1997, Phys. Rev. D, 55, 4903, 10.1103/PhysRevD.55.4903 · DOI
  42. S. Parke, 1983, Phys. Lett., 121B, 313, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)91376-X · DOI
  43. K. Kirsten, 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 48, 567, 10.1103/PhysRevD.48.567 · DOI
  44. T. S. Bunch, 1978, Proc. R. Soc. London, A360, 117, 10.1098/rspa.1978.0060 · DOI
  45. C.L. Bennett, 1996, Astrophys. J., 464, L1, 10.1086/310075 · DOI
  46. P. Candelas, 1975, Phys. Rev. D, 12, 965, 10.1103/PhysRevD.12.965 · DOI
  47. B. Ratra, 1985, Phys. Rev. D, 1931, 10.1103/PhysRevD.31.1931 · DOI
  48. I.S. Gradshteyn, 1980, Tables of Integrals, Series and Products
  49. 1970, Handbook of Mathematical Functions

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
García-Bellido, J., Garriga, J., & Montes, X.
Affiliations
European Organization for Nuclear Research (CH)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1998-04-15
Volume
57
Issue
8
Pages
4669-4685
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
OpenAlex
W1496372443
Cited by
42
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (publishedVersion)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
open inflation, two-field inflation, bubble nucleation, quantum tunneling, hyperboloid, slow-roll inflation, first-order phase transition, U(1) symmetry breaking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review