Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 894

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cosmology with a primordial scaling field

Open access
Ferreira, Pedro G., Joyce, Michael·1998·Physical Review D
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.58.023503
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A weakly coupled scalar field \ensuremath{\Phi} with a simple exponential potential ${V=M}_{P}^{4}\mathrm{exp}(\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\Phi}{/M}_{P})$ where ${M}_{P}$ is the reduced Planck mass, and $\ensuremath{\lambda}>2,$ has an attractor solution in a radiation or matter dominated universe in which it mimics the scaling of the dominant component, contributing a fixed fraction ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{\ensuremath{\varphi}}$ (determined by \ensuremath{\lambda}) to the energy density. Such fields arise generically in particle physics theories involving compactified dimensions, with values of \ensuremath{\lambda} which give a cosmologically relevant ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{\ensuremath{\varphi}}.$ For natural initial conditions on the scalar field in the early universe the attractor solution is established long before the epoch of structure formation, and in contrast with the solutions used in other scalar field cosmologies, it is one which does not involve an energy scale for the scalar field characteristic of late times. We study in some detail the evolution of matter and radiation perturbations in a standard inflation-motivated $\ensuremath{\Omega}=1$ dark-matter dominated cosmology with this extra field. Using a full Einstein-Boltzmann calculation we compare observable quantities with current data. We find that, for ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{\ensuremath{\varphi}}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.08--0.12,$ these models are consistent with large angle cosmic microwave background anisotropies as detected by COBE, the linear mass variance as compiled from galaxy surveys, big bang nucleosynthesis, the abundance of rich clusters and constraints from the Lyman-\ensuremath{\alpha} systems at high redshift. Given the simplicity of the model, its theoretical motivation and its success in matching observations, we argue that it should be taken on a par with other currently viable models of structure formation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.58.023503

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ferreira, P. G., & Joyce, M.
Venue
Physical Review D
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
1998-06-09
Volume
58
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.58.023503
OpenAlex
W2067579792
Cited by
894
References
6
FWCI
25.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.