CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 926Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quasinormal modes of AdS black holes and the approach to thermal equilibrium

Open access
Horowitz, Gary T., Hubeny, Veronika E.·2000·Physical Review D
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.62.024027
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We investigate the decay of a scalar field outside a Schwarzschild anti--de Sitter black hole. This is determined by computing the complex frequencies associated with quasinormal modes. There are qualitative differences from the asymptotically flat case, even in the limit of small black holes. In particular, for a given angular dependence, the decay is always exponential---there are no power law tails at late times. In terms of the AdS-CFT correspondence, a large black hole corresponds to an approximately thermal state in the field theory, and the decay of the scalar field corresponds to the decay of a perturbation of this state. Thus one obtains the time scale for the approach to thermal equilibrium. We compute these time scales for the strongly coupled field theories in three, four, and six dimensions, which are dual to string theory in asymptotically AdS spacetimes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.62.024027

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Horowitz, G. T., & Hubeny, V. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
ORCID
Venue
Physical Review D
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2000-06-27
Volume
62
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-4918
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.62.024027
OpenAlex
W2102478229
Cited by
926
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 40
FWCI
14.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Keywords
quasinormal modes, AdS black holes, Schwarzschild-AdS black hole, scalar field decay, AdS/CFT correspondence, power-law tails, strongly coupled field theory, string theory duals, asymptotically AdS spacetimes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review