The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA: Supermassive black hole binaries
Open accessAbstract
We compare the science capabilities of different eLISA mission designs, including four-link (two-arm) and six-link (three-arm) configurations with different arm lengths, low-frequency noise sensitivities and mission durations. For each of these configurations we consider a few representative massive black hole formation scenarios. These scenarios are chosen to explore two physical mechanisms that greatly affect eLISA rates, namely (i) black hole seeding, and (ii) the delays between the merger of two galaxies and the merger of the black holes hosted by those galaxies. We assess the eLISA parameter estimation accuracy using a Fisher matrix analysis with spin-precessing, inspiral-only waveforms. We quantify the information present in the merger and ringdown by rescaling the inspiral-only Fisher matrix estimates using the signal-to-noise ratio from nonprecessing inspiral-merger-ringdown phenomenological waveforms, and from a reduced set of precessing numerical relativity/post-Newtonian hybrid waveforms. We find that all of the eLISA configurations considered in our study should detect some massive black hole binaries. However, configurations with six links and better low-frequency noise will provide much more information on the origin of black holes at high redshifts and on their accretion history, and they may allow the identification of electromagnetic counterparts to massive black hole mergers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Fundamental Relation between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host Galaxies
Ferrarese, L., & Merritt, D. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312838 · Cited by 4,417
Inward Bound—The Search for Supermassive Black Holes in Galactic Nuclei
Kormendy, J., & Richstone, D. (1995) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.33.090195.003053 · Cited by 2,544
Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries
Blanchet, L. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-2 · Cited by 2,224
Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes
Berti, E., Cardoso, V., & Starinets, A. O. (2009) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/16/163001 · Cited by 2,095
Self-citationMassive black hole binaries in active galactic nuclei
Begelman, M. C., Blandford, R. D., & Rees, M. J. (1980) · Nature · doi:10.1038/287307a0 · Cited by 1,943
Discovery of a pulsar in a binary system
Hulse, R. A., & Taylor, J. H. (1975) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/181708 · Cited by 1,924
The Nucleosynthetic Signature of Population III
Heger, A., & Woosley, S. E. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/338487 · Cited by 1,669
A luminous quasar at a redshift of z = 7.085
Mortlock, D. J., Warren, S. J., Venemans, B. P., Patel, M., Hewett, P. C., McMahon, R. G., Simpson, C., Theuns, T., Gonzáles-Solares, E. A., Adamson, A., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10159 · Cited by 1,494
Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations
Berti, E., Barausse, E., Cardoso, V., Gualtieri, L., Pani, P., Sperhake, U., Stein, L. C., Wex, N., Yagi, K., Baker, T., et al. (2015) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/24/243001 · Cited by 1,477
Self-citationDetermining the Hubble constant from gravitational wave observations
Schutz, B. F. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323310a0 · Cited by 1,395
Cited by
Caprini, C., Hindmarsh, M., Huber, S., Konstandin, T., Kozaczuk, J., Nardini, G., No, J. M., Petiteau, A., Schwaller, P., Servant, G., et al. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/001 · Cited by 927
Self-citationGreene, J. E., Strader, J., & Ho, L. C. (2020) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021835 · Cited by 716
The Assembly of the First Massive Black Holes
Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E., & Haiman, Z. (2020) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455 · Cited by 665
Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna
Amaro-Seoane, P., Andrews, J., Arca Sedda, M., Askar, A., Baghi, Q., Balasov, R., Bartos, I., Bavera, S. S., Bellovary, J., Berry, C. P. L., et al. (2023) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y · Cited by 609
Self-citationShape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition
Hindmarsh, M., Huber, S. J., Rummukainen, K., & Weir, D. J. (2017) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.103520 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, A., Barausse, E., Sesana, A., Petiteau, A., Berti, E., Babak, S., Gair, J., Aoudia, S., Hinder, I., Ohme, F., & Wardell, B.
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2016-01-06
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2470-0010 (ISSN-L)
- 2470-0029
- OpenAlex
- W2179996778
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 103
- FWCI
- 24.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA: Supermassive black hole binaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevd.93.024003
- The paper
- Klein, A., Barausse, E., Sesana, A., Petiteau, A., Berti, E., Babak, S., Gair, J., Aoudia, S., Hinder, I., Ohme, F., & Wardell, B. (2016). Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA: Supermassive black hole binaries. Physical Review D. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.93.024003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
