CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 87

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Real no-boundary wave function in Lorentzian quantum cosmology

Dorronsoro, J. Diaz, Halliwell, J. J., Hartle, J. B., Hertog, T., Janssen, O.·2017·Physical Review D
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.96.043505
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.96.043505

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For a spin-1/2 field with antiperiodic boundary conditions, C_{1/2} = 0.3914, so there is no cancellation.

    “On the other hand, for a spin-1/2 field with antiperiodic boundary conditions, as studied in Ref. [39], ZS state that C 1/2 = 0.3914, so there is no cancellation.”

    From On Quantum Creation of a Toroidal Universe (2026) · cites this paper as [39]

    Section III (Scalar Matter; page unavailable) studies a scalar field, not a spin-1/2 field with antiperiodic boundary conditions. Searches for that field and boundary condition, cancellation, and 0.3914 found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevD.41.1815 · DOI
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevD.42.1931 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3997 · DOI
  4. 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/013 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.084049 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/JHEP05(2012)095 · DOI
  7. 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/01/015 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.021301 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevD.43.1170 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevD.25.3159 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.705 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevD.28.310 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevD.38.2468 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0550-3213(84)90093-2 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.123537 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevD.31.1777 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.103508 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevD.39.2206 · DOI
  19. E. Witten, 2011, AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics
  20. 10.1016/j.aop.2014.09.003 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/JHEP05(2017)056 · DOI
  22. R. B. Dingle, 1973, Asymptotic Expansions: Their Derivation and Interpretation
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevD.43.2572 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.063509 · DOI
  25. 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/07/007 · DOI
  26. F. Embacher, 1998, Hadronic J., 21, 337
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.124032 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.063510 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevD.47.5342 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.103524 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/JHEP12(2015)025 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dorronsoro, J. D., Halliwell, J. J., Hartle, J. B., Hertog, T., & Janssen, O.
Venue
Physical Review D
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2017-08-07
Volume
96
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 2470-0010
  • 2470-0029
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.96.043505
Cited by
87
References
2
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G092617N, G.0.E52.14N)
  • KU Leuven (C16/16/005)
  • H2020 European Research Council (ERC-2013-CoG 616732)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review