Cited by 266Orbital Angular Momentum in OpticsMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optical Nanoprobing via Spin-Orbit Interaction of Light

Open access

Abstract

We show, both theoretically and experimentally, that high-numerical-aperture (NA) optical microscopy is accompanied by strong spin-orbit interaction of light, which translates fine information about the specimen to the polarization degrees of freedom of light. An 80 nm gold nanoparticle scattering the light in the focus of a high-NA objective generates angular momentum conversion, which is seen as a nonuniform polarization distribution at the exit pupil. We demonstrate remarkable sensitivity of the effect to the position of the nanoparticle: Its subwavelength displacement produces the giant spin-Hall effect, i.e., macroseparation of spins in the outgoing light. This brings forth a far-field optical nanoprobing technique based on the spin-orbit interaction of light.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.104.253601

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. N. B. Baranova, 1994, JETP Lett., 59, 232
  2. B. Y. Zel’dovich, 1994, JETP Lett., 59, 766
  3. C. Brosseau, 1998, Polarized Light

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Rodríguez-Herrera, O. G., Lara, D., Bliokh, K. Y., Ostrovskaya, E. A., & Dainty, C.
Affiliations
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2010-06-22
Volume
104
Issue
25
Pages
253601-253601
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2007667860
Cited by
266
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Keywords
spin-orbit interaction of light, high numerical aperture microscopy, gold nanoparticles, spin Hall effect, polarization distribution, exit pupil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review