Cited by 669Advanced Condensed Matter PhysicsCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum many-body systems

Quantum Simulation of Frustrated Classical Magnetism in Triangular Optical Lattices

Open access
Struck, J., Ölschläger, C., Le Targat, R., Soltan-Panahi, P., Eckardt, A., Lewenstein, M., Windpassinger, P., Sengstock, K.·2011·Science

Abstract

An optical lattice of trapped atoms provides a tractable and tunable setup to study complex magnetic interactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1207239

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Control over the sign can be acquired by dynamical modulation of the lattice, Raman-assisted tunneling or embedding defects in infinite arrays.

    “Control over this sign can be acquired by dynamical modulation of the lattice [16-21], Raman-assisted tunneling [22, 23] or embedding defects in infinite arrays [24].”

    From Universal Sign Control of Coupling in Tight-Binding Lattices (2016) · cites this paper as [20]

  • The most advanced experiments with AQSs have been with ultracold atoms in optical lattices.

    “The most advanced experiments with AQSs have been with ultracold atoms in optical lattices [3, 5-15, 19, 71].”

    From Can one trust quantum simulators? (2012) · cites this paper as [12]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 13 Trotzky, S. et al. Science 319 (5861), 295-299 (2008)
  2. 18 Simon, J. et al. arXiv:1103.1372v1 (2011) · arXiv
  3. 23 Diep, H. T. and Giacomini, H. in Frustrated Spin Systems, (eds Diep, H.T.) 1-57 (World Scientific Publishing, 2004)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Struck, J., Ölschläger, C., Le Targat, R., Soltan-Panahi, P., Eckardt, A., Lewenstein, M., Windpassinger, P., & Sengstock, K.
Affiliations
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • Institut für Laserphysik, Universität Hamburg, D-22761 Hamburg, Germany.
  • Institute of Photonic Sciences (ES)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Sengstock, K.
Venue
Science
Published
2011-08-19
Volume
333
Issue
6045
Pages
996-999
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2065857896
Cited by
669
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 37
FWCI
43.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
quantum simulation, frustrated magnetism, triangular lattice, optical lattices, ultracold atoms, spin liquid, quantum phase transitions, ferromagnetism, antiferromagnetism, magnetic phase diagram, phase transitions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review