Cited by 56Particle physics theoretical and experimental studiesAtomic and Molecular PhysicsAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research

Direct Measurement of the Proton Magnetic Moment

Open access
DiSciacca, J., Gabrielse, G.·2012·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The proton magnetic moment in nuclear magnetons is measured to be ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{p}/{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{N}\ensuremath{\equiv}g/2=2.792\text{ }846\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.000\text{ }007$, a 2.5 parts per million uncertainty. The direct determination, using a single proton in a Penning trap, demonstrates the first method that should work as well with an antiproton ($\overline{p}$) as with a proton ($p$). This opens the way to measuring the $\overline{p}$ magnetic moment (whose uncertainty has essentially not been reduced for 20 years) at least ${10}^{3}$ times more precisely.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.108.153001

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Penning traps are a well-established tool for precision spectroscopy with small numbers of ions.

    “Penning traps are a well-established tool for precision spectroscopy with small numbers of ions25–28”

    From Penning micro-trap for quantum computing (2024) · cites this paper as [28]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DiSciacca, J., & Gabrielse, G.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2012-04-10
Volume
108
Issue
15
Pages
153001-153001
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2085605890
Cited by
56
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Keywords
proton magnetic moment, nuclear magneton, Penning trap, antiproton magnetic moment, antiprotons, magnetic moment measurement, precision measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review