The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Two Independent Sr Optical Clocks with1×10−17Stability at103 s
Open accessAbstract
Many-particle optical lattice clocks have the potential for unprecedented measurement precision and stability due to their low quantum projection noise. However, this potential has so far never been realized because clock stability has been limited by frequency noise of optical local oscillators. By synchronously probing two $^{87}\mathrm{Sr}$ lattice systems using a laser with a thermal noise floor of $1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}15}$, we remove classically correlated laser noise from the intercomparison, but this does not demonstrate independent clock performance. With an improved optical oscillator that has a $1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}16}$ thermal noise floor, we demonstrate an order of magnitude improvement over the best reported stability of any independent clock, achieving a fractional instability of $1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}17}$ in 1000 s of averaging time for synchronous or asynchronous comparisons. This result is within a factor of 2 of the combined quantum projection noise limit for a 160 ms probe time with $\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{3}$ atoms in each clock. We further demonstrate that even at this high precision, the overall systematic uncertainty of our clock is not limited by atomic interactions. For the second Sr clock, which has a cavity-enhanced lattice, the atomic-density-dependent frequency shift is evaluated to be $\ensuremath{-}3.11\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}17}$ with an uncertainty of $8.2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}19}$.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum projection noise: Population fluctuations in two-level systems
Itano, W. M., Bergquist, J. C., Bollinger, J. J., Gilligan, J. M., Heinzen, D. J., Moore, F. L., Raizen, M. G., & Wineland, D. J. (1993) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.47.3554 · Cited by 613
Making optical atomic clocks more stable with 10−16-level laser stabilization
Jiang, Y. Y., Ludlow, A. D., Lemke, N. D., Fox, R. W., Sherman, J. A., Ma, L.-S., & Oates, C. W. (2011) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.313 · Cited by 462
Santarelli, G., Audoin, C., Makdissi, A., Laurent, P., Dick, G. J., & Clairon, A. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · doi:10.1109/58.710548 · Cited by 314
Porsev, S. G., & Derevianko, A. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.74.020502 · Cited by 279
Interrogation oscillator noise rejection in the comparison of atomic fountains
Bize, S., Sortais, Y., Lemonde, P., Zhang, S., Laurent, P., Santarelli, G., Salomon, C., & Clairon, A. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · doi:10.1109/58.869073 · Cited by 34
Cited by
Ludlow, A. D., Boyd, M. M., Ye, J., Peik, E., & Schmidt, P. O. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.637 · Cited by 2,385
Self-citationAn optical lattice clock with accuracy and stability at the 10−18 level
Bloom, B. J., Nicholson, T. L., Williams, J. R., Campbell, S. L., Bishof, M., Zhang, X., Zhang, W., Bromley, S. L., & Ye, J. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12941 · Cited by 1,073
Self-citationCold atoms in cavity-generated dynamical optical potentials
Ritsch, H., Domokos, P., Brennecke, F., & Esslinger, T. (2013) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.553 · Cited by 933
An Atomic Clock with 10 –18 Instability
Hinkley, N., Sherman, J. A., Phillips, N. B., Schioppo, M., Lemke, N. D., Beloy, K., Pizzocaro, M., Oates, C. W., & Ludlow, A. D. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1240420 · Cited by 817
Systematic evaluation of an atomic clock at 2 × 10−18 total uncertainty
Nicholson, T. L., Campbell, S. L., Hutson, R. B., Marti, G. E., Bloom, B. J., McNally, R. L., Zhang, W., Barrett, M. D., Safronova, M. S., Strouse, G. F., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7896 · Cited by 780
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicholson, T. L., Martin, M. J., Williams, J. R., Bloom, B. J., Bishof, M., Swallows, M. D., Campbell, S. L., & Ye, J.
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2012-12-05
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 230801-230801
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2001026400
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Two Independent Sr Optical Clocks with1×10−17Stability at103 s. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevlett.109.230801
- The paper
- Nicholson, T. L., Martin, M. J., Williams, J. R., Bloom, B. J., Bishof, M., Swallows, M. D., Campbell, S. L., & Ye, J. (2012). Comparison of Two Independent Sr Optical Clocks with1×10−17Stability at103 s. Physical Review Letters. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.109.230801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.