The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Demonstration of Fidelity Improvement Using Dynamical Decoupling with Superconducting Qubits
Open accessAbstract
Quantum computers must be able to function in the presence of decoherence. The simplest strategy for decoherence reduction is dynamical decoupling (DD), which requires no encoding overhead and works by converting quantum gates into decoupling pulses. Here, using the IBM and Rigetti platforms, we demonstrate that the DD method is suitable for implementation in today's relatively noisy and small-scale cloud-based quantum computers. Using DD, we achieve substantial fidelity gains relative to unprotected, free evolution of individual superconducting transmon qubits. To a lesser degree, DD is also capable of protecting entangled two-qubit states. We show that dephasing and spontaneous emission errors are dominant in these systems, and that different DD sequences are capable of mitigating both effects. Unlike previous work demonstrating the use of quantum error correcting codes on the same platforms, we make no use of postselection and hence report unconditional fidelity improvements against natural decoherence.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recently, DD experiments were performed on the 16-qubit IBMQX5, 5-qubit IBMQX4, and the 19-qubit Rigetti Acorn chips (Pokharel et al. , 2018), where the gain in substantial gate fidelity relative to unprotected, free evolution of individual transmon qubits was demonstrated.”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Pokharel et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
Quantum computation with quantum dots
Loss, D., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.120 · Cited by 6,840
Scully, M. O., & Zubairy, M. S. (1997) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813993 · Cited by 6,589
A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer
Kane, B. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30156 · Cited by 3,779
Quantum Computations with Cold Trapped Ions
Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4091 · Cited by 3,733
Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., & Tsai, J. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19718 · Cited by 2,386
Dynamical Decoupling of Open Quantum Systems
Viola, L., Knill, E., & Lloyd, S. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.2417 · Cited by 1,808
The ‘transition probability’ in the state space of a—algebra
Uhlmann, A. (1976) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0034-4877(76)90060-4 · Cited by 1,649
Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems
Viola, L., & Lloyd, S. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.58.2733 · Cited by 1,617
Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., & Tsai, J. S. (1999) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,509
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 207
Quantum Computing in The Cloud - A Systematic Literature Review
Zhahir, A. A., Mohd, S. M., Shuhud, M. I. M., Idrus, B., Zainuddin, H. B., Jan, N. M., & Wahiddin, M. R. (2024) · International journal of electrical and computer engineering systems · doi:10.32985/ijeces.15.2.7 · Cited by 8
Generalized product formulas and quantum control
Burgarth, D. K., Paolo Facchi, A., Gramegna, G., & Pascazio, S. (2019) · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab4403 · Cited by 8
Problem-tailored Simulation of Energy Transport on Noisy Quantum Computers
Chen, I.-C., Pollock, K., Yao, Y., Orth, P. P., & Iadecola, T. (2024) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2024-12-03-1545 · Cited by 8
Ji, Y., Koenig, K. F., & Polian, I. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.032421 · Cited by 10
Superconducting quantum computing optimization based on multi-objective deep reinforcement learning
Liu, Y. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-73456-y · Cited by 13
Investigating the Individual Performances of Coupled Superconducting Transmon Qubits
Ahmad, H. G., Jordan, C., van den Boogaart, R., Waardenburg, D., Zachariadis, C., Mastrovito, P., Georgiev, A. L., Montemurro, D., Pepe, G. P., Arthers, M., et al. (2023) · Condensed Matter · doi:10.3390/condmat8010029 · Cited by 8
Austin, S., Khan, M. Q., Mudassar, M., & Chaudhry, A. Z. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.100.022102 · Cited by 6
Experimental simulation of hybrid quantum systems and entanglement on a quantum computer
Mazhandu, F., Mathieson, K., Coleman, C., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2019) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.5126505 · Cited by 7
Quantum error mitigation by layerwise Richardson extrapolation
Russo, V., & Mari, A. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.062420 · Cited by 12
Impact of time-retarded noise on dynamical decoupling schemes for qubits
Nakamura, K., & Ankerhold, J. (2025) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.064503 · Cited by 8
Quantum dynamics simulation of the advection-diffusion equation
Alipanah, H., Zhang, F., Yao, Y.-X., Thompson, R., Nguyen, N., Liu, J., Givi, P., McDermott, B. J., & Mendoza-Arenas, J. J. (2025) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/ndc3-bdwt · Cited by 15
Robust gates with spin-locked superconducting qubits
Zuk, I., Cohen, D., Gorshkov, A. V., & Retzker, A. (2024) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.013217 · Cited by 7
Chlih, A. A., & Rahman, A. U. (2024) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2024.129986 · Cited by 6
Virtual- Z Gates and Symmetric Gate Compilation
Vezvaee, A., Tripathi, V., Kowsari, D., Levenson-Falk, E. M., & Lidar, D. A. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.6.020348 · Cited by 13
Self-citationImplementation of leakage elimination operators and subspace protection
Markaida, B. G., & Wu, L.-A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-75730-1 · Cited by 6
Probing Quantum Telecloning on Superconducting Quantum Processors
Pelofske, E., Bärtschi, A., Eidenbenz, S., Garcia, B., & Kiefer, B. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2024.3391654 · Cited by 8
Characterizing spin-bath parameters using conventional and time-asymmetric Hahn-echo sequences
Farfurnik, D., & Bar‐Gill, N. (2020) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.104306 · Cited by 6
Tracking control of two qubit entanglement using piecewise time-independent method
Delben, G. J., & Beims, M. W. (2020) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/abd0bc · Cited by 6
Noise-Aware Detectable Byzantine Agreement for Consensus-based Distributed Quantum Computing
Chen, K., Prest, M. T., Burt, F., Yu, S., & Leung, K. K. (2025) · International Conference on Quantum Communications, Networking, and Computing (QCNC) · doi:10.1109/qcnc64685.2025.00042 · Cited by 5
Syncopated dynamical decoupling to suppress crosstalk in quantum circuits
Evert, B., Izquierdo, Z. G., Sud, J., Hu, H.-Y., Grabbe, S. R., Rieffel, E. G., Reagor, M. J., & Wang, Z. (2025) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/8lxc-lvv1 · Cited by 5
Uvarov, A., Rabinovich, D., Lakhmanskaya, O., Lakhmanskiy, K., Biamonte, J., & Adhikary, S. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.012404 · Cited by 9
Tensor Network Enhanced Dynamic Multiproduct Formulas
Robertson, N., Pokharel, B., Fuller, B., Switzer, E. D., Shtanko, O., Amico, M., Byrne, A., D'Urbano, A., Hayes-Shuptar, S., Akhriev, A., et al. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/8bzc-dlgt · Cited by 6
Self-citationLearning quantum dissipation by the neural ordinary differential equation
Chen, L., & Wu, Y.-D. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.022201 · Cited by 9
Benchmarking quantum processors with a single qubit
Göktaş, O., Tham, W. K., Bonsma-Fisher, K., & Brodutch, A. (2020) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-020-02642-4 · Cited by 6
Nonperturbative leakage elimination for a logical qubit encoded in a mechanical oscillator
Zheng, S., He, Q., Byrd, M., & Wu, L.-A. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033378 · Cited by 5
Nonlocality and coherence in double quantum dot systems
Abdel‐Khalek, S., Berrada, K., & Alkaoud, A. (2021) · Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures · doi:10.1016/j.physe.2021.114679 · Cited by 5
Exact nonequilibrium quantum observable statistics: A large-deviation approach
Gherardini, S. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.062105 · Cited by 6
Efficient Chromatic-Number-Based Multiqubit Decoherence and Crosstalk Suppression
Brown, A. F., & Lidar, D. A. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/1d4l-73x6 · Cited by 7
Self-citationOperating a Multi-Ion Clock with Dynamical Decoupling
Akerman, N., & Ozeri, R. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.013201 · Cited by 4
QuFeX: quantum feature extraction module for hybrid quantum-classical deep neural networks
Jain, N., & Kalev, A. (2025) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ae24a8 · Cited by 4
Tong, Y., & Chen, Q. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2023.3311732 · Cited by 4
Roy, A. K., Srivastava, V., Mahanti, S., Giarmatzi, C., & Gilchrist, A. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.012608 · Cited by 4
Pursuing high-fidelity control of spin qubits in natural Si/SiGe quantum dot
Wang, N., Wang, S., Zhang, R.-Z., Kang, J., Lu, W.-L., Li, H.-O., Cao, G., Wang, B., & Guo, G. (2024) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0230605 · Cited by 8
Seifert, L. M., Dangwal, S., Chong, F. T., & Ravi, G. S. (2024) · International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS) · doi:10.1145/3622781.3674178 · Cited by 11
Readout Error Mitigation for Mid-Circuit Measurements and Feedforward
Koh, J. M., Koh, D. E., & Thompson, J. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/cj89-4h5t · Cited by 24
Sequence of penalties method to study excited states using VQE
Carobene, R., Barison, S., & Giachero, A. (2023) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/acd1a9 · Cited by 4
Enhancing Parameter Estimation Precision in a Dissipative Environment with Two‐Photon Driving
Xie, D., & Xu, C. (2020) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201900387 · Cited by 4
Effects of Dynamical Decoupling and Pulse-Level Optimizations on IBM Quantum Computers
Niu, S., & Todri‐Sanial, A. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2022.3203153 · Cited by 57
Quantum locking of intrinsic spin squeezed state in Earth-field-range magnetometry
Yang, P., Bao, G., Chen, J., Du, W., Guo, J., & Zhang, W. (2025) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-025-00971-9 · Cited by 3
Faster Randomized Dynamical Decoupling
Yi, C., Kim, L., & Marvian, M. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/fk7j-y1vl · Cited by 4
A noise-resisted scheme of dynamical decoupling pulses for quantum memories
Gong, B., Tu, T., Zhu, X., Guo, A.-L., Zhou, Z., Guo, G., & Li, C. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72071-x · Cited by 3
Towards a layered architecture for error mitigation in quantum computation
Guimarães, J. D., & Tavares, C. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Software (QSW) · doi:10.1109/qsw55613.2022.00022 · Cited by 4
Quantum error precompensation for quantum noisy channels
Zhang, C., Li, L., Lu, G., Yuan, H., & Duan, R. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.042440 · Cited by 3
Wang, C., Harraz, S., Zhang, J., & Cong, S. (2023) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/acbd2a · Cited by 3
Quancorde: Boosting fidelity with Quantum Canary Ordered Diverse Ensembles
Ravi, G. S., Baker, J. M., Smith, K. N., Earnest, N., Javadi-Abhari, A., & Chong, F. T. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Rebooting Computing (ICRC) · doi:10.1109/icrc57508.2022.00014 · Cited by 19
Kuo, Y.-H., & Chen, H. (2023) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.5.043139 · Cited by 3
Qonductor: A Cloud Orchestrator for Quantum Computing
Giortamis, E., Romão, F., Tornow, N., Lugovoy, D., & Bhatotia, P. (2025) · International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC) · doi:10.1145/3712285.3759785 · Cited by 22
Bogatskaya, A. V., Schegolev, A. E., Klenov, N. V., & Popov, A. M. (2019) · Photonics · doi:10.3390/photonics6030084 · Cited by 3
Simulation of the influence of imperfections on dynamical decoupling of a superconducting qubit*
Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Zhao, C.-H., He, Y., Xu, D., & Chen, W. (2019) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/28/6/060201 · Cited by 3
Generation of perfect W-state and demonstration of its application to quantum information splittingPreprint
Swain, M., Devrari, V., Rai, A., Behera, B. K., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.01742 · Cited by 3
Towards defending crosstalk-mediated attacks in multi-tenant quantum computing
Mehra, D., & Kalev, A. (2026) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ae4429 · Cited by 5
Sparse non-Markovian Noise Modeling of Transmon-Based Multi-Qubit Operations
Oda, Y., Schultz, K., Norris, L., Shehab, O., & Quiroz, G. (2026) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/lx8x-z29x · Cited by 8
Quantum speed limit time in two-qubit system by dynamical decoupling method
Aaliray, A., & Mohammadi, H. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-93348-z · Cited by 3
Extracting the spin excitation spectrum of a fermionic system using a quantum processor
Vilchez-Estevez, L., Santos, R. A., Wang, S. Y., & Gambetta, F. M. (2025) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/ydfw-k83n · Cited by 8
Gate-based initialization and fidelity in correlated open quantum systems
Chen, S. P., Chen, J., & Davidović, D. M. (2025) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/gbmy-tp3g · Cited by 2
Digital Quantum Simulation of Spin Transport
Lee, Y.-T., Pokharel, B., Cohn, J., Schleife, A., & Banerjee, A. (2025) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/mx9k-kdlj · Cited by 2
Self-citationTesting precision and accuracy of weak value measurements in an IBM quantum system
Paredes, D. R. A. R., Uria, M., Massoni, E., & Zela, F. D. (2024) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0184965 · Cited by 2
D’Arrigo, A., Piccitto, G., Falci, G., & Paladino, E. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-67503-x · Cited by 4
Kasi, S., Sud, J., Jamieson, K., & Ravi, G. S. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce60285.2024.00051 · Cited by 3
Mammola, A., Desjardins, M. M., & Schaeverbeke, Q. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.042621 · Cited by 2
Liao, H., Hartnett, G. S., Kakkar, A., Tan, A. T. K., Hush, M., Mundada, P., Biercuk, M. J., & Baum, Y. (2025) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.6.020331 · Cited by 3
Suppressing spectator-induced dephasing through optimized dynamical decoupling implementation
Jeong, H., Kim, Y., Choi, B., Cho, M.-H., Woo, S., Chong, Y., Lee, Y., & Yeo, H. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-02370-8 · Cited by 2
Open quantum system approaches to superconducting qubits
Naeij, H. R. (2025) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-025-04838-y · Cited by 7
Gautam, A., Arvind, & Dorai, K. (2023) · International Journal of Quantum Information · doi:10.1142/s0219749923500168 · Cited by 2
Enhanced measurement precision with continuous interrogation during dynamical decoupling
张, J. 军. Z., 杜, P. 鹏. D., 敬, L. 雷. J., 徐, P. 鹏. X., 尤, L. 力. Y., & 张, W. 文. Z. (2023) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ad1985 · Cited by 2
Tong, Y., & Chen, Q. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tcad.2024.3483670 · Cited by 1
Dong, W., Wang, Y., & Khan, M. Q. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.062605 · Cited by 4
Multilevel dynamical decoupling for a coupled superconducting two-qubit system
Xu, W., Zhou, T., Zhang, K., Li, Z., Guo, T., Zuo, Q., Yu, M., Jiang, J., Pan, J., Li, J., et al. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/6wd3-wc5s · Cited by 1
Kumaran, K., Sajjan, M., Pokharel, B., Wang, K., Gibbs, J., Cohn, J., Jones, B., Mostame, S., Kais, S., & Banerjee, A. (2026) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/j971-h796 · Cited by 1
Self-citationNon‐Markovianity Benefits Quantum Dynamics Simulation
Chen, Y., Zhang, S., & Zhang, S. (2025) · Advanced Quantum Technologies · doi:10.1002/qute.202500405 · Cited by 6
Digital Zero-Noise Extrapolation with Quantum Circuit Unoptimization
Pelofske, E., & Russo, V. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce65121.2025.00020 · Cited by 7
Single-Copy Certification of Two-Qubit Gates Without Entanglement
Choi, Y., Singal, T., Cho, Y., Han, S.-W., Oh, K., Moon, S., Kim, Y., & Bae, J. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.18.044046 · Cited by 1
Irfan, A., Hashmi, S. F. A., Zaidi, S. N., Baig, M. U., Ayub, W., & Chaudhry, A. Z. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.042622 · Cited by 2
Coherence Protection of Electron Spin in Earth-Field Range by All-Optical Dynamic Decoupling
Yang, P., Bao, G., Chen, L. Q., & Zhang, W. (2021) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.16.014045 · Cited by 1
Spectral-Transfer-Tensor Method for Characterizing Non-Markovian Noise
Chen, Y., Zheng, Y.-C., Zhang, S., & Hsieh, C. (2022) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.17.064007 · Cited by 2
Implementation of a noise-robust quantum algorithm for multivariate polynomial factorization
Delgado, I. P., & Wu, L.-A. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.012607 · Cited by 1
Floquet dynamical decoupling at zero bias
Xu, P., & Zhang, J. (2023) · Physical review. B./Physical review. B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.174310 · Cited by 1
Quantum Computation of Hydride Ion using Variational Quantum Algorithm
Kalam, A., Kumar, S., Kumar, A., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2024) · ChemistrySelect · doi:10.1002/slct.202402699 · Cited by 1
Effective Hamiltonian and parametric tuning for the cross-cross-resonance gate in the transmon model
Kang, Y., & Moon, K. (2025) · Physical Review Applied · doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.23.014062 · Cited by 1
QuL: Programming Library for Computational Cooling of Qubits
Difranco, G., & Oftelie, L. B. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing · doi:10.1145/3737887 · Cited by 1
Multiple Joint Weak Measurements as a Way to Suppress the Decoherence
Konovalenko, O. M., & Maizelis, Z. А. (2025) · Ukrainian Journal of Physics · doi:10.15407/ujpe70.8.516 · Cited by 1
Suppressing Decoherence in Quantum State Transfer with Unitary Operations
Gavreev, M. A., Kiktenko, E. O., Mastiukova, A. S., & Fedorov, A. K. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e25010067 · Cited by 2
Reverse engineering pairwise entanglement.Preprint
Thompson, N. L., Nguyen, N. H., Behrman, E., & Steck, J. E. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
Implementation of a quantum private query using single-photon transistors
Nagtegaal, M. A., & Blaauboer, M. (2019) · Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/aafbc0
Experimental implementation of leakage elimination operatorsPreprint
Markaida, B. G., & Wu, L.-A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.04694
Nonperturbative leakage elimination for a logical qubit encoded in a mechanical oscillatorPreprint
Zheng, S., He, Q., Byrd, M., & Wu, L.-A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.09953
Quantum and post-quantum cryptography and cybersecurity: A systematic mapping
Markaida, B. G., Larrucea, X., & Graña, M. (2021) · Colección Jornadas y congresos · doi:10.18239/jornadas_2021.34.53
Experimental pairwise entanglement estimation for an N-qubit systemPreprint
Behrman, E., Thompson, N., Nguyen, N., & Steck, J. E. (2019) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.11398401
Experimental pairwise entanglement estimation for an N-qubit systemPreprint
Behrman, E., Thompson, N., Nguyen, N., & Steck, J. E. (2019) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.11398401.v1
Search for classical subsystems in quantum worlds
Adil, A., Rudolph, M. S., Arrasmith, A., Holmes, Z., Albrecht, A., & Sornborger, A. T. (2026) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/vj4x-96fk · Cited by 13
Ji, Y., & Polian, I. (2024) · OPUS Publication Server of the University of Stuttgart (University of Stuttgart) · doi:10.18419/opus-14924
Protection of Atomic Coherence in the Geomagnetic Environment
Yang, P., Bao, G., Chen, L. Q., & Zhang, W. (2024) · Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium (PIERS) · doi:10.1109/piers62282.2024.10618417
Wang, P., Yang, X., Wu, C.-W., Li, C.-Y., Wu, W., & Chen, P.-X. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/79nd-mr7f · Cited by 1
Hybrid classical-quantum computation of heat diffusion in multilayer materialsPreprint
Moradi, S. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6887498/v1
High-Fidelity Operations on Silicon Donor Qubits Using Dynamical Decoupling Gates
Cheng, J., Zhang, S., Guo, B., Xie, H., & Huang, P. (2025) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e27080805
Ye, J., & Khoo, J. Y. (2026) · International Conference on High Performance Computing in Asia-Pacific Region (HPC Asia) · doi:10.1145/3773656.3773674
COMPASS: Compiler Pass Selection For Improving Fidelity Of NISQ Applications
Dangwal, S., Ravi, G. S., Seifert, L. M., Das, P., Sud, J., & Chong, F. T. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Rebooting Computing (ICRC) · doi:10.1109/icrc64395.2024.10937002 · Cited by 1
Scalable fluxonium-transmon architecture for error-corrected quantum processors
Heunisch, L., Huang, L., Eckstein, T., Tasler, S., Schirk, J., Wallner, F., Feulner, V., Sarma, B., Liegener, K., Schneider, C. M. F., et al. (2026) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/ts1j-nfg1 · Cited by 5
Circuit compilation and error mitigation for near-term quantum computing
Niu, S. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/4b9fc4d0z9683z4a8dz8643zc514443d2d75
Metadata
- Authors
- Pokharel, B., Anand, N., Fortman, B., & Lidar, D. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review Letters
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2018-11-29
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 220502-220502
- ISSN
- 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1079-7114
- OpenAlex
- W2884173913
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15
- FWCI
- 7.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Bulletin of the American Physical Society
- Funders
- Oracle
- Lockheed Martin
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Keywords
- dynamical decoupling, superconducting qubits, transmon qubits, decoherence suppression, gate fidelity, dephasing, spontaneous emission, entanglement protection, two-qubit gates, IBM Quantum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
